Theories of reproduction and resistance: a review of the educational debate from the materialist perspective
<p>The question of whether school is a place for social transformation or not is a central issue to modern educational thought, particularly in the last decades of the twentieth century. «Theories of resistance» of the 80’s and 90’s aimed to show the transformative potential of schooling throu...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | deu |
Published: |
FahrenHouse
2015-02-01
|
Series: | Foro de Educación |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://forodeeducacion.com/ojs/index.php/fde/article/view/320 |
id |
doaj-2e07c62e5f564c5e83eae5e16cdbe228 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-2e07c62e5f564c5e83eae5e16cdbe2282020-11-25T01:07:32ZdeuFahrenHouseForo de Educación1698-77991698-78022015-02-011318699110.14516/fde.2015.013.018.004329Theories of reproduction and resistance: a review of the educational debate from the materialist perspectiveDana Hirsch0Victoria Rio1Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET) / Universidad Nacional de LujánUniversidad de Buenos Aires<p>The question of whether school is a place for social transformation or not is a central issue to modern educational thought, particularly in the last decades of the twentieth century. «Theories of resistance» of the 80’s and 90’s aimed to show the transformative potential of schooling through the development of a critical pedagogy, in clear response to the so called «theories of reproduction», which in the 70›had denounced the role played by school in capitalism. This article aims to make a review of this discussion and, particularly, the antagonistic form in which it has been developed, from a materialist perspective. To that end, main classics of both group of theories will be analyzed identifying that, although they seem antagonist, they coincide on one central point: the belief that capitalist social relations are imposed externally to the subject, to a supposal free subjectivity. While «theories of reproduction» argue that such domination can only be faced through class struggle, which can only be given outside school, «theories of resistance» argue that struggle may be developedin the ideological sphere within schooling. The premise of this article is that such external imposition is an appearance product of the alienated character of our consciousness, and does not allow to analyze that social relations, far from being imposed to our free will, are developed by us to organize social work. To transcend these appearances, a process of recognition of the general determinations of education in capitalism will be developed, in order to enable us to overcome a binary logic between reproduction and transformation, and think social transformation as part of the process of social organization itself.</p><div><p><strong>How to reference this article</strong></p><p><a href="/ojs/index.php/fde/editor/viewMetadata/Hirsch,%20D.,%20Rio,%20V.%20(2015).%20Teorías%20de%20la%20reproducción%20y%20teorías%20de%20la%20resistencia:%20una%20revisión%20del%20debate%20pedagógico%20desde%20la%20perspectiva%20materialista.%20Foro%20de%20Educación,%2013(18),%20pp.%2069-91.%20doi:%20http:/dx.doi.org/10.14516/fde.2015.013.018.004" target="_blank">Hirsch, D., Rio, V. (2015). Teorías de la reproducción y teorías de la resistencia: una revisión del debate pedagógico desde la perspectiva materialista. <em>Foro de Educación</em>, 13(18), pp. 69-91. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14516/fde.2015.013.018.004</a></p></div>http://forodeeducacion.com/ojs/index.php/fde/article/view/320escolarizaciónsociedad capitalistacambio socialpedagogía críticamaterialismo |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
deu |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Dana Hirsch Victoria Rio |
spellingShingle |
Dana Hirsch Victoria Rio Theories of reproduction and resistance: a review of the educational debate from the materialist perspective Foro de Educación escolarización sociedad capitalista cambio social pedagogía crítica materialismo |
author_facet |
Dana Hirsch Victoria Rio |
author_sort |
Dana Hirsch |
title |
Theories of reproduction and resistance: a review of the educational debate from the materialist perspective |
title_short |
Theories of reproduction and resistance: a review of the educational debate from the materialist perspective |
title_full |
Theories of reproduction and resistance: a review of the educational debate from the materialist perspective |
title_fullStr |
Theories of reproduction and resistance: a review of the educational debate from the materialist perspective |
title_full_unstemmed |
Theories of reproduction and resistance: a review of the educational debate from the materialist perspective |
title_sort |
theories of reproduction and resistance: a review of the educational debate from the materialist perspective |
publisher |
FahrenHouse |
series |
Foro de Educación |
issn |
1698-7799 1698-7802 |
publishDate |
2015-02-01 |
description |
<p>The question of whether school is a place for social transformation or not is a central issue to modern educational thought, particularly in the last decades of the twentieth century. «Theories of resistance» of the 80’s and 90’s aimed to show the transformative potential of schooling through the development of a critical pedagogy, in clear response to the so called «theories of reproduction», which in the 70›had denounced the role played by school in capitalism. This article aims to make a review of this discussion and, particularly, the antagonistic form in which it has been developed, from a materialist perspective. To that end, main classics of both group of theories will be analyzed identifying that, although they seem antagonist, they coincide on one central point: the belief that capitalist social relations are imposed externally to the subject, to a supposal free subjectivity. While «theories of reproduction» argue that such domination can only be faced through class struggle, which can only be given outside school, «theories of resistance» argue that struggle may be developedin the ideological sphere within schooling. The premise of this article is that such external imposition is an appearance product of the alienated character of our consciousness, and does not allow to analyze that social relations, far from being imposed to our free will, are developed by us to organize social work. To transcend these appearances, a process of recognition of the general determinations of education in capitalism will be developed, in order to enable us to overcome a binary logic between reproduction and transformation, and think social transformation as part of the process of social organization itself.</p><div><p><strong>How to reference this article</strong></p><p><a href="/ojs/index.php/fde/editor/viewMetadata/Hirsch,%20D.,%20Rio,%20V.%20(2015).%20Teorías%20de%20la%20reproducción%20y%20teorías%20de%20la%20resistencia:%20una%20revisión%20del%20debate%20pedagógico%20desde%20la%20perspectiva%20materialista.%20Foro%20de%20Educación,%2013(18),%20pp.%2069-91.%20doi:%20http:/dx.doi.org/10.14516/fde.2015.013.018.004" target="_blank">Hirsch, D., Rio, V. (2015). Teorías de la reproducción y teorías de la resistencia: una revisión del debate pedagógico desde la perspectiva materialista. <em>Foro de Educación</em>, 13(18), pp. 69-91. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14516/fde.2015.013.018.004</a></p></div> |
topic |
escolarización sociedad capitalista cambio social pedagogía crítica materialismo |
url |
http://forodeeducacion.com/ojs/index.php/fde/article/view/320 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT danahirsch theoriesofreproductionandresistanceareviewoftheeducationaldebatefromthematerialistperspective AT victoriario theoriesofreproductionandresistanceareviewoftheeducationaldebatefromthematerialistperspective |
_version_ |
1725186779431043072 |