Effect of Cellular Mobile Phone Use and Cetrizine on Hand-Eye Coordination and Visual Acuity
Introduction: Cellular mobile phones are a major cause of distraction especially while driving. The aggressive and inappropriate use of cellular mobile phones has increased the risk of accidents. Similar alerts are available in literature for certain substances and drugs (e.g. second generation...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited
2017-09-01
|
Series: | Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/10653/24370_CE[Ra]_F(Sh)_PF1(PB_GG)_PFA(VJ_SS).pdf |
Summary: | Introduction: Cellular mobile phones are a major cause
of distraction especially while driving. The aggressive and
inappropriate use of cellular mobile phones has increased the
risk of accidents. Similar alerts are available in literature for
certain substances and drugs (e.g. second generation anti H1
drug –Cetirizine) which also derange psychomotor performance
and parameters of alertness.
Aim: This study measured variations in hand-eye coordination
and visual acuity due to use of cellular mobile phone in
comparison to that of commonly used antihistaminic drug viz.,
single dose Cetirizine 10 mg.
Materials and Methods: It was a single blind, single dose,
interventional study, 100 healthy human volunteers divided into
two groups. Baseline readings of all volunteers were noted.
Group-I (n=50) was Cetirizine group (10mg orally stat), Group
–II (n=50) Cellular mobile phone user group. Alertness was
tested on hand– steadiness tester (Reaction Time Index = RTI)
and on Flicker–fusion apparatus (visual acuity - Critical Flicker
Fusion Frequency per second= CFFF/sec). Baseline readings
of all volunteers were noted before intervention. Baseline was
compared with readings at three hour post-intervention and was
analysed by paired t-test. Inter-group comparison of parameters
was also done and was analysed by unpaired t-test.
Results: The baseline RTI (95.46±41.74, 85.11±39.05) and CFF
low and high (40.07±9.970, 40.76±9.309 and 40.42±9.035,
40.48±9.863) respectively, in Cetirizine group and Mobile
user group were comparable. The RTI increased significantly
(116.4±51.46, 102.8±49.26) in both the groups after intervention.
However, there is no significant change in CFF intensity from
baseline in either group post-intervention.
Conclusion: Concurrent use of mobile phone while performing
tasks, showed significant impairment of hand–steadiness which
was comparable to that produced by single dose Cetirizine 10
mg and this may be one of the factors contributing to their close
association with road traffic accidents. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2249-782X 0973-709X |