Prevalence and incidence of diabetic peripheral neuropathy in Latin America and the Caribbean: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

<h4>Aims</h4>The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to estimate the prevalence and incidence of diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) in Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC).<h4>Materials and methods</h4>We searched MEDLINE, SCOPUS, Web of Science, EMBAS...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marlon Yovera-Aldana, Victor Velásquez-Rimachi, Andrely Huerta-Rosario, M D More-Yupanqui, Mariela Osores-Flores, Ricardo Espinoza, Fradis Gil-Olivares, César Quispe-Nolazco, Flor Quea-Vélez, Christian Morán-Mariños, Isabel Pinedo-Torres, Carlos Alva-Diaz, Kevin Pacheco-Barrios
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251642
Description
Summary:<h4>Aims</h4>The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to estimate the prevalence and incidence of diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) in Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC).<h4>Materials and methods</h4>We searched MEDLINE, SCOPUS, Web of Science, EMBASE and LILACS databases of published observational studies in LAC up to December 2020. Meta-analyses of proportions were performed using random-effects models using Stata Program 15.1. Heterogeneity was evaluated through sensitivity, subgroup, and meta-regression analyses. Evidence certainty was performed with the GRADE approach.<h4>Results</h4>Twenty-nine studies from eight countries were included. The estimated prevalence of DPN was 46.5% (95%CI: 38.0-55.0) with a significant heterogeneity (I2 = 98.2%; p<0.01). Only two studies reported incidence, and the pooled effect size was 13.7% (95%CI: 10.6-17.2). We found an increasing trend of cumulative DPN prevalence over time. The main sources of heterogeneity associated with higher prevalence were diagnosis criteria, higher A1c (%), and inadequate sample size. We judge the included evidence as very low certainty.<h4>Conclusion</h4>The overall prevalence of DPN is high in LAC with significant heterogeneity between and within countries that could be explained by population type and methodological aspects. Significant gaps (e.g., under-representation of most countries, lack of incidence studies, and heterogenous case definition) were identified. Standardized and population-based studies of DPN in LAC are needed.
ISSN:1932-6203