Changing paradigm in intravenous fluid resuscitation in sepsis and critical illnesses

Intravenous (IV) fluid resuscitation, pioneered in 1832, is now one of the most common medical interventions in hospitalized patients. Up until the end of the 20th century, IV fluid prescriptions have been considered ancillary, benign interventions and rarely tested in good-quality randomized clinic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Prabhakar Gupta, Kuldeep Kumar Ashta
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2018-01-01
Series:Journal of Marine Medical Society
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.marinemedicalsociety.in/article.asp?issn=0975-3605;year=2018;volume=20;issue=2;spage=148;epage=152;aulast=Gupta
id doaj-2dede62b57914f09badb78210a8ac7d2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2dede62b57914f09badb78210a8ac7d22020-11-24T21:58:41ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Marine Medical Society0975-36052018-01-0120214815210.4103/jmms.jmms_9_18Changing paradigm in intravenous fluid resuscitation in sepsis and critical illnessesPrabhakar GuptaKuldeep Kumar AshtaIntravenous (IV) fluid resuscitation, pioneered in 1832, is now one of the most common medical interventions in hospitalized patients. Up until the end of the 20th century, IV fluid prescriptions have been considered ancillary, benign interventions and rarely tested in good-quality randomized clinical trials (RCTs). Robust clinical research evidence emerging in the past decade and a half, however, has revealed counterintuitive findings. The emerging research has consistently demonstrated harm, including higher mortality, and questionable clinical benefits associated with protocolized aggressive fluid resuscitation, as espoused in the early goal-directed therapy. Conservative fluid management has been shown to be associated with better outcomes in most clinical settings. Recent RCTs have also revealed clinically relevant pharmacological differences between types of IV fluids, especially pertaining to predictable harms associated with some commonly used IV fluids. Concerns have emerged over risks of metabolic acidosis and renal failure associated with the use of normal saline. Balanced solutions have been found to be safe across a wide spectrum of conditions. Better understanding of the complex pathophysiology of sepsis and critical illnesses and recognition of newer concepts such as profound disruption of the endothelial glycocalyx layer leading to profound leakiness of vessels question the basic premise of injection of large quantities of IV fluids during resuscitation.http://www.marinemedicalsociety.in/article.asp?issn=0975-3605;year=2018;volume=20;issue=2;spage=148;epage=152;aulast=GuptaConservative late fluid managementearly goal-directed therapyendothelial glycocalyxmean circulatory filling pressuremyocardial depressionstressed volumeunstressed volumevascular leakinessvasoplegia
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Prabhakar Gupta
Kuldeep Kumar Ashta
spellingShingle Prabhakar Gupta
Kuldeep Kumar Ashta
Changing paradigm in intravenous fluid resuscitation in sepsis and critical illnesses
Journal of Marine Medical Society
Conservative late fluid management
early goal-directed therapy
endothelial glycocalyx
mean circulatory filling pressure
myocardial depression
stressed volume
unstressed volume
vascular leakiness
vasoplegia
author_facet Prabhakar Gupta
Kuldeep Kumar Ashta
author_sort Prabhakar Gupta
title Changing paradigm in intravenous fluid resuscitation in sepsis and critical illnesses
title_short Changing paradigm in intravenous fluid resuscitation in sepsis and critical illnesses
title_full Changing paradigm in intravenous fluid resuscitation in sepsis and critical illnesses
title_fullStr Changing paradigm in intravenous fluid resuscitation in sepsis and critical illnesses
title_full_unstemmed Changing paradigm in intravenous fluid resuscitation in sepsis and critical illnesses
title_sort changing paradigm in intravenous fluid resuscitation in sepsis and critical illnesses
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Journal of Marine Medical Society
issn 0975-3605
publishDate 2018-01-01
description Intravenous (IV) fluid resuscitation, pioneered in 1832, is now one of the most common medical interventions in hospitalized patients. Up until the end of the 20th century, IV fluid prescriptions have been considered ancillary, benign interventions and rarely tested in good-quality randomized clinical trials (RCTs). Robust clinical research evidence emerging in the past decade and a half, however, has revealed counterintuitive findings. The emerging research has consistently demonstrated harm, including higher mortality, and questionable clinical benefits associated with protocolized aggressive fluid resuscitation, as espoused in the early goal-directed therapy. Conservative fluid management has been shown to be associated with better outcomes in most clinical settings. Recent RCTs have also revealed clinically relevant pharmacological differences between types of IV fluids, especially pertaining to predictable harms associated with some commonly used IV fluids. Concerns have emerged over risks of metabolic acidosis and renal failure associated with the use of normal saline. Balanced solutions have been found to be safe across a wide spectrum of conditions. Better understanding of the complex pathophysiology of sepsis and critical illnesses and recognition of newer concepts such as profound disruption of the endothelial glycocalyx layer leading to profound leakiness of vessels question the basic premise of injection of large quantities of IV fluids during resuscitation.
topic Conservative late fluid management
early goal-directed therapy
endothelial glycocalyx
mean circulatory filling pressure
myocardial depression
stressed volume
unstressed volume
vascular leakiness
vasoplegia
url http://www.marinemedicalsociety.in/article.asp?issn=0975-3605;year=2018;volume=20;issue=2;spage=148;epage=152;aulast=Gupta
work_keys_str_mv AT prabhakargupta changingparadigminintravenousfluidresuscitationinsepsisandcriticalillnesses
AT kuldeepkumarashta changingparadigminintravenousfluidresuscitationinsepsisandcriticalillnesses
_version_ 1725850675403816960