Academic integrity and contract cheating policy analysis of colleges in Ontario, Canada
Abstract In this study, we analyzed the academic integrity policies of colleges in Ontario, Canada, casting a specific lens on contract cheating. We extracted data from 28 individual documents from 22-publicly-funded colleges including policies and procedures (n = 27) and code of conduct (n = 1). We...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2019-08-01
|
Series: | International Journal for Educational Integrity |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40979-019-0042-4 |
id |
doaj-2de4fd5bb1a147f8bc2af40730b76212 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-2de4fd5bb1a147f8bc2af40730b762122020-11-25T03:01:30ZengBMCInternational Journal for Educational Integrity1833-25952019-08-0115111810.1007/s40979-019-0042-4Academic integrity and contract cheating policy analysis of colleges in Ontario, CanadaBrenda M. Stoesz0Sarah Elaine Eaton1Jennifer Miron2Emma J. Thacker3Centre for the Advancement of Teaching and Learning, University of ManitobaWerklund School of Education, University of CalgaryHumber College Institute of Technology and Advanced LearningDurham CollegeAbstract In this study, we analyzed the academic integrity policies of colleges in Ontario, Canada, casting a specific lens on contract cheating. We extracted data from 28 individual documents from 22-publicly-funded colleges including policies and procedures (n = 27) and code of conduct (n = 1). We analyzed the characteristics of the documents from three perspectives: (a) document type and titles; (b) policy language; and (c) policy principles. Then we examined five core elements of the documentation including (a) access; (b) approach; (c) responsibility; (d) detail; and (e) support. Key findings revealed that specific and direct language pertaining to contract cheating was largely absent from the policy documents, that underlying policy principles lacked clear definition, and that exemplary policy has yet to be developed in this context. We conclude with recommendations for increased policy research in the area of academic integrity and a call for policy revision in Canadian higher education institutions to more explicitly address the issue of contract cheating, as well as provide more support to students and other campus stakeholders to better understand how contract cheating impacts and impedes teaching and learning.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40979-019-0042-4Academic integrityCanadaCollegeContract cheatingHigher educationPolicy |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Brenda M. Stoesz Sarah Elaine Eaton Jennifer Miron Emma J. Thacker |
spellingShingle |
Brenda M. Stoesz Sarah Elaine Eaton Jennifer Miron Emma J. Thacker Academic integrity and contract cheating policy analysis of colleges in Ontario, Canada International Journal for Educational Integrity Academic integrity Canada College Contract cheating Higher education Policy |
author_facet |
Brenda M. Stoesz Sarah Elaine Eaton Jennifer Miron Emma J. Thacker |
author_sort |
Brenda M. Stoesz |
title |
Academic integrity and contract cheating policy analysis of colleges in Ontario, Canada |
title_short |
Academic integrity and contract cheating policy analysis of colleges in Ontario, Canada |
title_full |
Academic integrity and contract cheating policy analysis of colleges in Ontario, Canada |
title_fullStr |
Academic integrity and contract cheating policy analysis of colleges in Ontario, Canada |
title_full_unstemmed |
Academic integrity and contract cheating policy analysis of colleges in Ontario, Canada |
title_sort |
academic integrity and contract cheating policy analysis of colleges in ontario, canada |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
International Journal for Educational Integrity |
issn |
1833-2595 |
publishDate |
2019-08-01 |
description |
Abstract In this study, we analyzed the academic integrity policies of colleges in Ontario, Canada, casting a specific lens on contract cheating. We extracted data from 28 individual documents from 22-publicly-funded colleges including policies and procedures (n = 27) and code of conduct (n = 1). We analyzed the characteristics of the documents from three perspectives: (a) document type and titles; (b) policy language; and (c) policy principles. Then we examined five core elements of the documentation including (a) access; (b) approach; (c) responsibility; (d) detail; and (e) support. Key findings revealed that specific and direct language pertaining to contract cheating was largely absent from the policy documents, that underlying policy principles lacked clear definition, and that exemplary policy has yet to be developed in this context. We conclude with recommendations for increased policy research in the area of academic integrity and a call for policy revision in Canadian higher education institutions to more explicitly address the issue of contract cheating, as well as provide more support to students and other campus stakeholders to better understand how contract cheating impacts and impedes teaching and learning. |
topic |
Academic integrity Canada College Contract cheating Higher education Policy |
url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40979-019-0042-4 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT brendamstoesz academicintegrityandcontractcheatingpolicyanalysisofcollegesinontariocanada AT sarahelaineeaton academicintegrityandcontractcheatingpolicyanalysisofcollegesinontariocanada AT jennifermiron academicintegrityandcontractcheatingpolicyanalysisofcollegesinontariocanada AT emmajthacker academicintegrityandcontractcheatingpolicyanalysisofcollegesinontariocanada |
_version_ |
1724693447184482304 |