Academic integrity and contract cheating policy analysis of colleges in Ontario, Canada

Abstract In this study, we analyzed the academic integrity policies of colleges in Ontario, Canada, casting a specific lens on contract cheating. We extracted data from 28 individual documents from 22-publicly-funded colleges including policies and procedures (n = 27) and code of conduct (n = 1). We...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Brenda M. Stoesz, Sarah Elaine Eaton, Jennifer Miron, Emma J. Thacker
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-08-01
Series:International Journal for Educational Integrity
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40979-019-0042-4
id doaj-2de4fd5bb1a147f8bc2af40730b76212
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2de4fd5bb1a147f8bc2af40730b762122020-11-25T03:01:30ZengBMCInternational Journal for Educational Integrity1833-25952019-08-0115111810.1007/s40979-019-0042-4Academic integrity and contract cheating policy analysis of colleges in Ontario, CanadaBrenda M. Stoesz0Sarah Elaine Eaton1Jennifer Miron2Emma J. Thacker3Centre for the Advancement of Teaching and Learning, University of ManitobaWerklund School of Education, University of CalgaryHumber College Institute of Technology and Advanced LearningDurham CollegeAbstract In this study, we analyzed the academic integrity policies of colleges in Ontario, Canada, casting a specific lens on contract cheating. We extracted data from 28 individual documents from 22-publicly-funded colleges including policies and procedures (n = 27) and code of conduct (n = 1). We analyzed the characteristics of the documents from three perspectives: (a) document type and titles; (b) policy language; and (c) policy principles. Then we examined five core elements of the documentation including (a) access; (b) approach; (c) responsibility; (d) detail; and (e) support. Key findings revealed that specific and direct language pertaining to contract cheating was largely absent from the policy documents, that underlying policy principles lacked clear definition, and that exemplary policy has yet to be developed in this context. We conclude with recommendations for increased policy research in the area of academic integrity and a call for policy revision in Canadian higher education institutions to more explicitly address the issue of contract cheating, as well as provide more support to students and other campus stakeholders to better understand how contract cheating impacts and impedes teaching and learning.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40979-019-0042-4Academic integrityCanadaCollegeContract cheatingHigher educationPolicy
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Brenda M. Stoesz
Sarah Elaine Eaton
Jennifer Miron
Emma J. Thacker
spellingShingle Brenda M. Stoesz
Sarah Elaine Eaton
Jennifer Miron
Emma J. Thacker
Academic integrity and contract cheating policy analysis of colleges in Ontario, Canada
International Journal for Educational Integrity
Academic integrity
Canada
College
Contract cheating
Higher education
Policy
author_facet Brenda M. Stoesz
Sarah Elaine Eaton
Jennifer Miron
Emma J. Thacker
author_sort Brenda M. Stoesz
title Academic integrity and contract cheating policy analysis of colleges in Ontario, Canada
title_short Academic integrity and contract cheating policy analysis of colleges in Ontario, Canada
title_full Academic integrity and contract cheating policy analysis of colleges in Ontario, Canada
title_fullStr Academic integrity and contract cheating policy analysis of colleges in Ontario, Canada
title_full_unstemmed Academic integrity and contract cheating policy analysis of colleges in Ontario, Canada
title_sort academic integrity and contract cheating policy analysis of colleges in ontario, canada
publisher BMC
series International Journal for Educational Integrity
issn 1833-2595
publishDate 2019-08-01
description Abstract In this study, we analyzed the academic integrity policies of colleges in Ontario, Canada, casting a specific lens on contract cheating. We extracted data from 28 individual documents from 22-publicly-funded colleges including policies and procedures (n = 27) and code of conduct (n = 1). We analyzed the characteristics of the documents from three perspectives: (a) document type and titles; (b) policy language; and (c) policy principles. Then we examined five core elements of the documentation including (a) access; (b) approach; (c) responsibility; (d) detail; and (e) support. Key findings revealed that specific and direct language pertaining to contract cheating was largely absent from the policy documents, that underlying policy principles lacked clear definition, and that exemplary policy has yet to be developed in this context. We conclude with recommendations for increased policy research in the area of academic integrity and a call for policy revision in Canadian higher education institutions to more explicitly address the issue of contract cheating, as well as provide more support to students and other campus stakeholders to better understand how contract cheating impacts and impedes teaching and learning.
topic Academic integrity
Canada
College
Contract cheating
Higher education
Policy
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40979-019-0042-4
work_keys_str_mv AT brendamstoesz academicintegrityandcontractcheatingpolicyanalysisofcollegesinontariocanada
AT sarahelaineeaton academicintegrityandcontractcheatingpolicyanalysisofcollegesinontariocanada
AT jennifermiron academicintegrityandcontractcheatingpolicyanalysisofcollegesinontariocanada
AT emmajthacker academicintegrityandcontractcheatingpolicyanalysisofcollegesinontariocanada
_version_ 1724693447184482304