Policy Autonomy, Coordination or Harmonization in the Persistently Heterogeneous European Union?

Within the context of the continuing integration process in Europe, this paper addresses the question of whether policies in the EU should head towards autonomy, coordination or harmonization. Taking the path dependence effect into account, it is the authors’ opinion that Europe has gone too far in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kouba Luděk, Mádr Michal, Nerudová Danuše, Rozmahel Petr
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sciendo 2016-03-01
Series:Danube
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1515/danb-2016-0004
id doaj-2dcc491a94f84da0833ce8e45bc72033
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2dcc491a94f84da0833ce8e45bc720332021-09-05T20:42:41ZengSciendoDanube1804-82852016-03-0171537110.1515/danb-2016-0004danb-2016-0004Policy Autonomy, Coordination or Harmonization in the Persistently Heterogeneous European Union?Kouba Luděk0Mádr Michal1Nerudová Danuše2Rozmahel Petr3 Department of Economics, Faculty of Business and Economics, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic. Department of Economics, Faculty of Business and Economics, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic. Department of Accounting and Taxes, Faculty of Business and Economics, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic. Department of Economics, Faculty of Business and Economics, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic.Within the context of the continuing integration process in Europe, this paper addresses the question of whether policies in the EU should head towards autonomy, coordination or harmonization. Taking the path dependence effect into account, it is the authors’ opinion that Europe has gone too far in its integration process to be able to continue with policies being fully under the competences of individual member countries. However, the habitual question still arises: does fiscal policy need to be harmonized to a level comparable to monetary policy as these two policies, necessarily, complement each other? This paper argues that it does not. There are three main arguments discussed. Firstly, the authors build on the theory of fiscal federalism. Secondly, there are significantly different regimes of welfare states and extents of social policies among European countries, which strongly determine the character of public finance. And thirdly, the tax systems across Europe are also highly divergent, with many features of continuing tax competition.https://doi.org/10.1515/danb-2016-0004european unionfiscal policyheterogeneitypolicy coordinationpolicy harmonization
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kouba Luděk
Mádr Michal
Nerudová Danuše
Rozmahel Petr
spellingShingle Kouba Luděk
Mádr Michal
Nerudová Danuše
Rozmahel Petr
Policy Autonomy, Coordination or Harmonization in the Persistently Heterogeneous European Union?
Danube
european union
fiscal policy
heterogeneity
policy coordination
policy harmonization
author_facet Kouba Luděk
Mádr Michal
Nerudová Danuše
Rozmahel Petr
author_sort Kouba Luděk
title Policy Autonomy, Coordination or Harmonization in the Persistently Heterogeneous European Union?
title_short Policy Autonomy, Coordination or Harmonization in the Persistently Heterogeneous European Union?
title_full Policy Autonomy, Coordination or Harmonization in the Persistently Heterogeneous European Union?
title_fullStr Policy Autonomy, Coordination or Harmonization in the Persistently Heterogeneous European Union?
title_full_unstemmed Policy Autonomy, Coordination or Harmonization in the Persistently Heterogeneous European Union?
title_sort policy autonomy, coordination or harmonization in the persistently heterogeneous european union?
publisher Sciendo
series Danube
issn 1804-8285
publishDate 2016-03-01
description Within the context of the continuing integration process in Europe, this paper addresses the question of whether policies in the EU should head towards autonomy, coordination or harmonization. Taking the path dependence effect into account, it is the authors’ opinion that Europe has gone too far in its integration process to be able to continue with policies being fully under the competences of individual member countries. However, the habitual question still arises: does fiscal policy need to be harmonized to a level comparable to monetary policy as these two policies, necessarily, complement each other? This paper argues that it does not. There are three main arguments discussed. Firstly, the authors build on the theory of fiscal federalism. Secondly, there are significantly different regimes of welfare states and extents of social policies among European countries, which strongly determine the character of public finance. And thirdly, the tax systems across Europe are also highly divergent, with many features of continuing tax competition.
topic european union
fiscal policy
heterogeneity
policy coordination
policy harmonization
url https://doi.org/10.1515/danb-2016-0004
work_keys_str_mv AT koubaludek policyautonomycoordinationorharmonizationinthepersistentlyheterogeneouseuropeanunion
AT madrmichal policyautonomycoordinationorharmonizationinthepersistentlyheterogeneouseuropeanunion
AT nerudovadanuse policyautonomycoordinationorharmonizationinthepersistentlyheterogeneouseuropeanunion
AT rozmahelpetr policyautonomycoordinationorharmonizationinthepersistentlyheterogeneouseuropeanunion
_version_ 1717785275620392960