Variance in multiplex suspension array assays: microsphere size variation impact

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Luminex suspension microarray assays are in widespread use. There are issues of variability of assay readings using this technology.</p> <p>Methods and results</p> <p>Size variation is demonstrated by transmis...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cheng R Holland, Xing Li, Hanley Brian P
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2007-08-01
Series:Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling
Online Access:http://www.tbiomed.com/content/4/1/31
id doaj-2dbe49796a824aa4aec64b51d01be072
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2dbe49796a824aa4aec64b51d01be0722020-11-25T00:06:32ZengBMCTheoretical Biology and Medical Modelling1742-46822007-08-01413110.1186/1742-4682-4-31Variance in multiplex suspension array assays: microsphere size variation impactCheng R HollandXing LiHanley Brian P<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Luminex suspension microarray assays are in widespread use. There are issues of variability of assay readings using this technology.</p> <p>Methods and results</p> <p>Size variation is demonstrated by transmission electron microscopy. Size variations of microspheres are shown to occur in stepwise increments. A strong correspondence between microsphere size distribution and distribution of fluorescent events from assays is shown. An estimate is made of contribution of microsphere size variation to assay variance.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>A probable significant cause of variance in suspended microsphere assay results is variation in microsphere diameter. This can potentially be addressed by changes in the manufacturing process. Provision to users of mean size, median size, skew, the number of standard deviations that half the size range represents (sigma multiple), and standard deviation is recommended. Establishing a higher sigma multiple for microsphere production is likely to deliver a significant improvement in precision of raw instrument readings. Further research is recommended on the molecular architecture of microsphere coatings.</p> http://www.tbiomed.com/content/4/1/31
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Cheng R Holland
Xing Li
Hanley Brian P
spellingShingle Cheng R Holland
Xing Li
Hanley Brian P
Variance in multiplex suspension array assays: microsphere size variation impact
Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling
author_facet Cheng R Holland
Xing Li
Hanley Brian P
author_sort Cheng R Holland
title Variance in multiplex suspension array assays: microsphere size variation impact
title_short Variance in multiplex suspension array assays: microsphere size variation impact
title_full Variance in multiplex suspension array assays: microsphere size variation impact
title_fullStr Variance in multiplex suspension array assays: microsphere size variation impact
title_full_unstemmed Variance in multiplex suspension array assays: microsphere size variation impact
title_sort variance in multiplex suspension array assays: microsphere size variation impact
publisher BMC
series Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling
issn 1742-4682
publishDate 2007-08-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Luminex suspension microarray assays are in widespread use. There are issues of variability of assay readings using this technology.</p> <p>Methods and results</p> <p>Size variation is demonstrated by transmission electron microscopy. Size variations of microspheres are shown to occur in stepwise increments. A strong correspondence between microsphere size distribution and distribution of fluorescent events from assays is shown. An estimate is made of contribution of microsphere size variation to assay variance.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>A probable significant cause of variance in suspended microsphere assay results is variation in microsphere diameter. This can potentially be addressed by changes in the manufacturing process. Provision to users of mean size, median size, skew, the number of standard deviations that half the size range represents (sigma multiple), and standard deviation is recommended. Establishing a higher sigma multiple for microsphere production is likely to deliver a significant improvement in precision of raw instrument readings. Further research is recommended on the molecular architecture of microsphere coatings.</p>
url http://www.tbiomed.com/content/4/1/31
work_keys_str_mv AT chengrholland varianceinmultiplexsuspensionarrayassaysmicrospheresizevariationimpact
AT xingli varianceinmultiplexsuspensionarrayassaysmicrospheresizevariationimpact
AT hanleybrianp varianceinmultiplexsuspensionarrayassaysmicrospheresizevariationimpact
_version_ 1725421617229594624