Diagnostic Value of 200-Minute Postprandial Esophageal Multichannel Intraluminal Impedance-pH-Monitoring in Comparison with 24-Hour Variant
24-hour esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance (MII)-pH-monitoring is the most accurate method for detecting abnormal gastroesophageal reflux in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease and other conditions. However, some investigators have found that short-duration conventional pH-moni...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Publishing House Zaslavsky
2015-04-01
|
Series: | Gastroenterologìa |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://gastro.zaslavsky.com.ua/article/view/81485 |
id |
doaj-2dbc9c6956734568966668d18eb9dc30 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-2dbc9c6956734568966668d18eb9dc302020-11-24T23:14:22ZengPublishing House ZaslavskyGastroenterologìa 2308-20972518-78802015-04-01492.5651110.22141/2308-2097.2.56.2015.8148581485Diagnostic Value of 200-Minute Postprandial Esophageal Multichannel Intraluminal Impedance-pH-Monitoring in Comparison with 24-Hour VariantS.H. Melashchenko0V.M. Chernobrovyi1O.O Ksenchyn2Vinnytsia National Medical University named after M.I. Pyrohov, VinnytsiaVinnytsia National Medical University named after M.I. Pyrohov, VinnytsiaVinnytsia National Medical University named after M.I. Pyrohov, Vinnytsia24-hour esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance (MII)-pH-monitoring is the most accurate method for detecting abnormal gastroesophageal reflux in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease and other conditions. However, some investigators have found that short-duration conventional pH-monitoring in the postprandial phase is also useful, but it has not been proven for MII-pH-monitoring. Objective: to assess diagnostic capability of 200-minute postprandial MII-pH-monitoring compared to 24-hour study. Materials and Methods. Patients were divided into 2 groups: the 1st(gastroesophageal reflux disease) — 6 women and 9 men, mean age (M ± m) was 44.8 ± 4.2 years; the 2nd (functional dyspepsia) — 6 women and 7 men, mean age was 49.2 ± 3.9 years. We have separately analyzed the data of 200 minutes of the study and the data from the entire 24-hour period. The test period included 45 min before provocative standardized breakfast (507 kcal) and 140 min after. Results. The correlation between the results of both studies was strong: for the number of acid refluxes — r = 0.88 (95% confident interval (CI) 0.76–0.95; p < 0.0001); for the total number of refluxes — r = 0.82 (95% CI 0.64–0.92; p < 0.0001). For the time when pH < 4, the correlation was slightly worse — r = 0.69 (95% CI 0.41–0.85; p < 0.0001). The normal reflux number was calculated by means of ROC-curve. The reflux was considered as abnormal when the number of acid refluxes > 6 episodes for 200 minutes and > 40 for 24-hour period, the total number of refluxes > 17 episodes for 200 minutes and > 74 for 24-hour period. Conclusion. In general, our results indicate that the 200-minute study can be fully utilized to quantify gastroesophageal reflux.http://gastro.zaslavsky.com.ua/article/view/81485multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH-monitoringgastroesophageal reflux diseasefunctional dyspepsia |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
S.H. Melashchenko V.M. Chernobrovyi O.O Ksenchyn |
spellingShingle |
S.H. Melashchenko V.M. Chernobrovyi O.O Ksenchyn Diagnostic Value of 200-Minute Postprandial Esophageal Multichannel Intraluminal Impedance-pH-Monitoring in Comparison with 24-Hour Variant Gastroenterologìa multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH-monitoring gastroesophageal reflux disease functional dyspepsia |
author_facet |
S.H. Melashchenko V.M. Chernobrovyi O.O Ksenchyn |
author_sort |
S.H. Melashchenko |
title |
Diagnostic Value of 200-Minute Postprandial Esophageal Multichannel Intraluminal Impedance-pH-Monitoring in Comparison with 24-Hour Variant |
title_short |
Diagnostic Value of 200-Minute Postprandial Esophageal Multichannel Intraluminal Impedance-pH-Monitoring in Comparison with 24-Hour Variant |
title_full |
Diagnostic Value of 200-Minute Postprandial Esophageal Multichannel Intraluminal Impedance-pH-Monitoring in Comparison with 24-Hour Variant |
title_fullStr |
Diagnostic Value of 200-Minute Postprandial Esophageal Multichannel Intraluminal Impedance-pH-Monitoring in Comparison with 24-Hour Variant |
title_full_unstemmed |
Diagnostic Value of 200-Minute Postprandial Esophageal Multichannel Intraluminal Impedance-pH-Monitoring in Comparison with 24-Hour Variant |
title_sort |
diagnostic value of 200-minute postprandial esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance-ph-monitoring in comparison with 24-hour variant |
publisher |
Publishing House Zaslavsky |
series |
Gastroenterologìa |
issn |
2308-2097 2518-7880 |
publishDate |
2015-04-01 |
description |
24-hour esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance (MII)-pH-monitoring is the most accurate method for detecting abnormal gastroesophageal reflux in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease and other conditions. However, some investigators have found that short-duration conventional pH-monitoring in the postprandial phase is also useful, but it has not been proven for MII-pH-monitoring.
Objective: to assess diagnostic capability of 200-minute postprandial MII-pH-monitoring compared to 24-hour study.
Materials and Methods. Patients were divided into 2 groups: the 1st(gastroesophageal reflux disease) — 6 women and 9 men, mean age (M ± m) was 44.8 ± 4.2 years; the 2nd (functional dyspepsia) — 6 women and 7 men, mean age was 49.2 ± 3.9 years. We have separately analyzed the data of 200 minutes of the study and the data from the entire 24-hour period. The test period included 45 min before provocative standardized breakfast (507 kcal) and 140 min after.
Results. The correlation between the results of both studies was strong: for the number of acid refluxes — r = 0.88 (95% confident interval (CI) 0.76–0.95; p < 0.0001); for the total number of refluxes — r = 0.82 (95% CI 0.64–0.92; p < 0.0001). For the time when pH < 4, the correlation was slightly worse — r = 0.69 (95% CI 0.41–0.85; p < 0.0001). The normal reflux number was calculated by means of ROC-curve. The reflux was considered as abnormal when the number of acid refluxes > 6 episodes for 200 minutes and > 40 for 24-hour period, the total number of refluxes > 17 episodes for 200 minutes and > 74 for 24-hour period.
Conclusion. In general, our results indicate that the 200-minute study can be fully utilized to quantify gastroesophageal reflux. |
topic |
multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH-monitoring gastroesophageal reflux disease functional dyspepsia |
url |
http://gastro.zaslavsky.com.ua/article/view/81485 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT shmelashchenko diagnosticvalueof200minutepostprandialesophagealmultichannelintraluminalimpedancephmonitoringincomparisonwith24hourvariant AT vmchernobrovyi diagnosticvalueof200minutepostprandialesophagealmultichannelintraluminalimpedancephmonitoringincomparisonwith24hourvariant AT ooksenchyn diagnosticvalueof200minutepostprandialesophagealmultichannelintraluminalimpedancephmonitoringincomparisonwith24hourvariant |
_version_ |
1725594771974520832 |