La modernité politique de la Révolution française
This article addresses the way in which the dialectic of continuity and rupture may prove to be heuristic, particularly in the case of so radical an event as the French Revolution. To that end we propose an investigation into the history of concepts at the beginning of modern times, of civic humanis...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Spanish |
Published: |
Casa de Velázquez
2006-04-01
|
Series: | Mélanges de la Casa de Velázquez |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journals.openedition.org/mcv/2262 |
id |
doaj-2d8765acbcee4313aa791b79b64b7b91 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-2d8765acbcee4313aa791b79b64b7b912020-11-25T00:25:02ZspaCasa de VelázquezMélanges de la Casa de Velázquez0076-230X2173-13062006-04-01361173410.4000/mcv.2262La modernité politique de la Révolution françaiseJacques GuilhaumouThis article addresses the way in which the dialectic of continuity and rupture may prove to be heuristic, particularly in the case of so radical an event as the French Revolution. To that end we propose an investigation into the history of concepts at the beginning of modern times, of civic humanism from the Renaissance to the French Revolution. The idea is to take into consideration a whole series of new figures which developed at the time of the emergence of the modern individual: the citizen in the City versus the Prince, of course, but also the legislator/prophet versus the virtuous individual, the engineer versus the practical philosopher, the orator versus the legislator/philosopher, etc. In this succession of figures the French Revolution occupies a central place thanks to the ultimate invention of the political metaphysics of the individual/nation. This invention then passed through the interpretation of the German philosophers of the time of the Revolution, essentially Humboldt, Kant and Fichte. In short, what we seek to achieve is to place the forward vision of the French Revolution within a metaphysics of the subject, along with that part of it that recognised the dignity of the self.http://journals.openedition.org/mcv/2262DiscourseFrench RevolutionIndividualKantModernity/Anti-modernitySieyès |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
Spanish |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Jacques Guilhaumou |
spellingShingle |
Jacques Guilhaumou La modernité politique de la Révolution française Mélanges de la Casa de Velázquez Discourse French Revolution Individual Kant Modernity/Anti-modernity Sieyès |
author_facet |
Jacques Guilhaumou |
author_sort |
Jacques Guilhaumou |
title |
La modernité politique de la Révolution française |
title_short |
La modernité politique de la Révolution française |
title_full |
La modernité politique de la Révolution française |
title_fullStr |
La modernité politique de la Révolution française |
title_full_unstemmed |
La modernité politique de la Révolution française |
title_sort |
la modernité politique de la révolution française |
publisher |
Casa de Velázquez |
series |
Mélanges de la Casa de Velázquez |
issn |
0076-230X 2173-1306 |
publishDate |
2006-04-01 |
description |
This article addresses the way in which the dialectic of continuity and rupture may prove to be heuristic, particularly in the case of so radical an event as the French Revolution. To that end we propose an investigation into the history of concepts at the beginning of modern times, of civic humanism from the Renaissance to the French Revolution. The idea is to take into consideration a whole series of new figures which developed at the time of the emergence of the modern individual: the citizen in the City versus the Prince, of course, but also the legislator/prophet versus the virtuous individual, the engineer versus the practical philosopher, the orator versus the legislator/philosopher, etc. In this succession of figures the French Revolution occupies a central place thanks to the ultimate invention of the political metaphysics of the individual/nation. This invention then passed through the interpretation of the German philosophers of the time of the Revolution, essentially Humboldt, Kant and Fichte. In short, what we seek to achieve is to place the forward vision of the French Revolution within a metaphysics of the subject, along with that part of it that recognised the dignity of the self. |
topic |
Discourse French Revolution Individual Kant Modernity/Anti-modernity Sieyès |
url |
http://journals.openedition.org/mcv/2262 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT jacquesguilhaumou lamodernitepolitiquedelarevolutionfrancaise |
_version_ |
1725350172342353920 |