La modernité politique de la Révolution française

This article addresses the way in which the dialectic of continuity and rupture may prove to be heuristic, particularly in the case of so radical an event as the French Revolution. To that end we propose an investigation into the history of concepts at the beginning of modern times, of civic humanis...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jacques Guilhaumou
Format: Article
Language:Spanish
Published: Casa de Velázquez 2006-04-01
Series:Mélanges de la Casa de Velázquez
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/mcv/2262
id doaj-2d8765acbcee4313aa791b79b64b7b91
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2d8765acbcee4313aa791b79b64b7b912020-11-25T00:25:02ZspaCasa de VelázquezMélanges de la Casa de Velázquez0076-230X2173-13062006-04-01361173410.4000/mcv.2262La modernité politique de la Révolution françaiseJacques GuilhaumouThis article addresses the way in which the dialectic of continuity and rupture may prove to be heuristic, particularly in the case of so radical an event as the French Revolution. To that end we propose an investigation into the history of concepts at the beginning of modern times, of civic humanism from the Renaissance to the French Revolution. The idea is to take into consideration a whole series of new figures which developed at the time of the emergence of the modern individual: the citizen in the City versus the Prince, of course, but also the legislator/prophet versus the virtuous individual, the engineer versus the practical philosopher, the orator versus the legislator/philosopher, etc. In this succession of figures the French Revolution occupies a central place thanks to the ultimate invention of the political metaphysics of the individual/nation. This invention then passed through the interpretation of the German philosophers of the time of the Revolution, essentially Humboldt, Kant and Fichte. In short, what we seek to achieve is to place the forward vision of the French Revolution within a metaphysics of the subject, along with that part of it that recognised the dignity of the self.http://journals.openedition.org/mcv/2262DiscourseFrench RevolutionIndividualKantModernity/Anti-modernitySieyès
collection DOAJ
language Spanish
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jacques Guilhaumou
spellingShingle Jacques Guilhaumou
La modernité politique de la Révolution française
Mélanges de la Casa de Velázquez
Discourse
French Revolution
Individual
Kant
Modernity/Anti-modernity
Sieyès
author_facet Jacques Guilhaumou
author_sort Jacques Guilhaumou
title La modernité politique de la Révolution française
title_short La modernité politique de la Révolution française
title_full La modernité politique de la Révolution française
title_fullStr La modernité politique de la Révolution française
title_full_unstemmed La modernité politique de la Révolution française
title_sort la modernité politique de la révolution française
publisher Casa de Velázquez
series Mélanges de la Casa de Velázquez
issn 0076-230X
2173-1306
publishDate 2006-04-01
description This article addresses the way in which the dialectic of continuity and rupture may prove to be heuristic, particularly in the case of so radical an event as the French Revolution. To that end we propose an investigation into the history of concepts at the beginning of modern times, of civic humanism from the Renaissance to the French Revolution. The idea is to take into consideration a whole series of new figures which developed at the time of the emergence of the modern individual: the citizen in the City versus the Prince, of course, but also the legislator/prophet versus the virtuous individual, the engineer versus the practical philosopher, the orator versus the legislator/philosopher, etc. In this succession of figures the French Revolution occupies a central place thanks to the ultimate invention of the political metaphysics of the individual/nation. This invention then passed through the interpretation of the German philosophers of the time of the Revolution, essentially Humboldt, Kant and Fichte. In short, what we seek to achieve is to place the forward vision of the French Revolution within a metaphysics of the subject, along with that part of it that recognised the dignity of the self.
topic Discourse
French Revolution
Individual
Kant
Modernity/Anti-modernity
Sieyès
url http://journals.openedition.org/mcv/2262
work_keys_str_mv AT jacquesguilhaumou lamodernitepolitiquedelarevolutionfrancaise
_version_ 1725350172342353920