The Strategy of Drone Warfare
There is a budding controversy with the combat use of Remotely Piloted Aircraft (RPA). Also known as Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV), there is a growing literature critiquing the use of RPAs, often using the pejorative term “drone.” RPAs seem to get the blame for a variety of complaints about policy...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Henley-Putnam University
2014-12-01
|
Series: | Journal of Strategic Security |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/jss/vol7/iss4/9/ |
id |
doaj-2d84507ddf344e79ad135cc33e6d4882 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-2d84507ddf344e79ad135cc33e6d48822020-11-25T00:09:27ZengHenley-Putnam UniversityJournal of Strategic Security1944-04641944-04722014-12-0174108119http://dx.doi.org/10.5038/1944-0472.7.4.8The Strategy of Drone WarfareMike Fowler0United States Air Force AcademyThere is a budding controversy with the combat use of Remotely Piloted Aircraft (RPA). Also known as Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV), there is a growing literature critiquing the use of RPAs, often using the pejorative term “drone.” RPAs seem to get the blame for a variety of complaints about policy and employment that have little to do with the airframe or its processes. While all of the military functions of an RPA can and are done by manned aircraft, the RPAs must endure additional scrutiny. The decision to employ RPAs requires additional considerations at both the strategic and operational levels of war. This article explores the strategic issues that govern the decisions to employ RPAs in combat. The decision to employ RPAs involves a variety of strategic and operational concerns involving legal issues, technological constraints, operational efficiency, and an interdependency upon information operations. http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/jss/vol7/iss4/9/CounterterrorismForeign policyIntelligence collectionMilitary affairsSecurity studiesSmall wars and insurgencies |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Mike Fowler |
spellingShingle |
Mike Fowler The Strategy of Drone Warfare Journal of Strategic Security Counterterrorism Foreign policy Intelligence collection Military affairs Security studies Small wars and insurgencies |
author_facet |
Mike Fowler |
author_sort |
Mike Fowler |
title |
The Strategy of Drone Warfare |
title_short |
The Strategy of Drone Warfare |
title_full |
The Strategy of Drone Warfare |
title_fullStr |
The Strategy of Drone Warfare |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Strategy of Drone Warfare |
title_sort |
strategy of drone warfare |
publisher |
Henley-Putnam University |
series |
Journal of Strategic Security |
issn |
1944-0464 1944-0472 |
publishDate |
2014-12-01 |
description |
There is a budding controversy with the combat use of Remotely Piloted Aircraft (RPA). Also known as Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV), there is a growing literature critiquing the use of RPAs, often using the pejorative term “drone.” RPAs seem to get the blame for a variety of complaints about policy and employment that have little to do with the airframe or its processes. While all of the military functions of an RPA can and are done by manned aircraft, the RPAs must endure additional scrutiny. The decision to employ RPAs requires additional considerations at both the strategic and operational levels of war. This article explores the strategic issues that govern the decisions to employ RPAs in combat. The decision to employ RPAs involves a variety of strategic and operational concerns involving legal issues, technological constraints, operational efficiency, and an interdependency upon information operations.
|
topic |
Counterterrorism Foreign policy Intelligence collection Military affairs Security studies Small wars and insurgencies |
url |
http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/jss/vol7/iss4/9/ |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT mikefowler thestrategyofdronewarfare AT mikefowler strategyofdronewarfare |
_version_ |
1725411816499052544 |