The effect of mechanical and chemical polishing techniques on the surface roughness of heat-polymerized and visible light-polymerized acrylic denture base resins

Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of mechanical polishing (MP) and chemical polishing (CP) on the average surface roughness (Ra) of heat-cured (HC) and light-cured (LC) denture base acrylic resins. Methods: A total of 120 specimens (30 × 15 × 3 mm) were prepared from on...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Abdul Aziz Abdullah Al-Kheraif
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2014-04-01
Series:Saudi Dental Journal
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1013905214000029
id doaj-2d7dd2dad75a40c1b33680069148c410
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2d7dd2dad75a40c1b33680069148c4102020-11-25T00:49:05ZengElsevierSaudi Dental Journal1013-90522014-04-012625662The effect of mechanical and chemical polishing techniques on the surface roughness of heat-polymerized and visible light-polymerized acrylic denture base resinsAbdul Aziz Abdullah Al-Kheraif0Tel.: +966 554299995.; Dental Health Department, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh 11541, Saudi ArabiaObjective: The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of mechanical polishing (MP) and chemical polishing (CP) on the average surface roughness (Ra) of heat-cured (HC) and light-cured (LC) denture base acrylic resins. Methods: A total of 120 specimens (30 × 15 × 3 mm) were prepared from one HC and one LC acrylic resin. To remove nodules and gross surface irregularities, all specimens were finished with a lathe-mounted small acrylic bur and 360-grit sandpaper. Ten finished specimens of each acrylic resin were randomly assigned to each of six polishing techniques: Resilit High-luster Polishing Liquid (RHPL), Universal Polishing Paste, Abraso-star K50, pumice, Jet Seal Liquid, or Acrypoint. MP was performed with an automatic polishing machine for 2 min, under 50 rpm and 500 g of load. CP was performed by immersing the HC and LC specimens in preheated methyl methacrylate at 75 ± 1 °C for 10 s. The surface roughness of the acrylic resin specimens was measured with a contact profilometer. The Ra values were analyzed by two-way analysis of variance, post hoc Scheffe's test, and paired t-test (p ⩽ 0.05). Polished and tested acrylic resin surfaces were evaluated by scanning electron microscopy. Results: MP was more effective than CP. The smoothest surface was obtained with the use of the RHPL on the LC (0.05 ± 0.01 μm) or HC (0.07 ± 0.01 μm) acrylic resin. Two-way ANOVA showed a statistically significant difference between MP and CP. Conclusions: MP produced the smoothest surface of denture base acrylic resin. The mean surface roughness values after MP and CP were not influenced by the type of acrylic resin. Keywords: Surface roughness, Mechanical polishing, Chemical polishing, Contact profilometer, Acrylic resinhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1013905214000029
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Abdul Aziz Abdullah Al-Kheraif
spellingShingle Abdul Aziz Abdullah Al-Kheraif
The effect of mechanical and chemical polishing techniques on the surface roughness of heat-polymerized and visible light-polymerized acrylic denture base resins
Saudi Dental Journal
author_facet Abdul Aziz Abdullah Al-Kheraif
author_sort Abdul Aziz Abdullah Al-Kheraif
title The effect of mechanical and chemical polishing techniques on the surface roughness of heat-polymerized and visible light-polymerized acrylic denture base resins
title_short The effect of mechanical and chemical polishing techniques on the surface roughness of heat-polymerized and visible light-polymerized acrylic denture base resins
title_full The effect of mechanical and chemical polishing techniques on the surface roughness of heat-polymerized and visible light-polymerized acrylic denture base resins
title_fullStr The effect of mechanical and chemical polishing techniques on the surface roughness of heat-polymerized and visible light-polymerized acrylic denture base resins
title_full_unstemmed The effect of mechanical and chemical polishing techniques on the surface roughness of heat-polymerized and visible light-polymerized acrylic denture base resins
title_sort effect of mechanical and chemical polishing techniques on the surface roughness of heat-polymerized and visible light-polymerized acrylic denture base resins
publisher Elsevier
series Saudi Dental Journal
issn 1013-9052
publishDate 2014-04-01
description Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of mechanical polishing (MP) and chemical polishing (CP) on the average surface roughness (Ra) of heat-cured (HC) and light-cured (LC) denture base acrylic resins. Methods: A total of 120 specimens (30 × 15 × 3 mm) were prepared from one HC and one LC acrylic resin. To remove nodules and gross surface irregularities, all specimens were finished with a lathe-mounted small acrylic bur and 360-grit sandpaper. Ten finished specimens of each acrylic resin were randomly assigned to each of six polishing techniques: Resilit High-luster Polishing Liquid (RHPL), Universal Polishing Paste, Abraso-star K50, pumice, Jet Seal Liquid, or Acrypoint. MP was performed with an automatic polishing machine for 2 min, under 50 rpm and 500 g of load. CP was performed by immersing the HC and LC specimens in preheated methyl methacrylate at 75 ± 1 °C for 10 s. The surface roughness of the acrylic resin specimens was measured with a contact profilometer. The Ra values were analyzed by two-way analysis of variance, post hoc Scheffe's test, and paired t-test (p ⩽ 0.05). Polished and tested acrylic resin surfaces were evaluated by scanning electron microscopy. Results: MP was more effective than CP. The smoothest surface was obtained with the use of the RHPL on the LC (0.05 ± 0.01 μm) or HC (0.07 ± 0.01 μm) acrylic resin. Two-way ANOVA showed a statistically significant difference between MP and CP. Conclusions: MP produced the smoothest surface of denture base acrylic resin. The mean surface roughness values after MP and CP were not influenced by the type of acrylic resin. Keywords: Surface roughness, Mechanical polishing, Chemical polishing, Contact profilometer, Acrylic resin
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1013905214000029
work_keys_str_mv AT abdulazizabdullahalkheraif theeffectofmechanicalandchemicalpolishingtechniquesonthesurfaceroughnessofheatpolymerizedandvisiblelightpolymerizedacrylicdenturebaseresins
AT abdulazizabdullahalkheraif effectofmechanicalandchemicalpolishingtechniquesonthesurfaceroughnessofheatpolymerizedandvisiblelightpolymerizedacrylicdenturebaseresins
_version_ 1725253103193686016