Preface to the special issue: "Comparing Educational Modelling Languages on the 'Planet Game' Case Study"

People with a background in computer science tend to refer to technical specifications for designing learning as metadata standards. And strictly speaking, they are right. Such educational modelling languages, as specification languages for designing learning opportunities are generically called, ta...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Peter B. Sloep
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Ubiquity Press 2008-12-01
Series:Journal of Interactive Media in Education
Subjects:
Online Access:https://jime.open.ac.uk/articles/144
id doaj-2d63016eb0d44f1492f045139286e9b8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2d63016eb0d44f1492f045139286e9b82020-11-25T00:14:44ZengUbiquity PressJournal of Interactive Media in Education1365-893X2008-12-012008210.5334/2008-17205Preface to the special issue: "Comparing Educational Modelling Languages on the 'Planet Game' Case Study"Peter B. Sloep0Programme Director Research & Development Technology Enhanced Learning. Centre for Learning Sciences and Technologies (CELSTEC), formely OTEC. The Open University of the Netherlands, Valkenburgerweg 177. 6419 AT HeerlenPeople with a background in computer science tend to refer to technical specifications for designing learning as metadata standards. And strictly speaking, they are right. Such educational modelling languages, as specification languages for designing learning opportunities are generically called, take a collection of learning opportunities as its starting point and then 'embellishes' them by allotting to them students and staff in various roles, as well as pertinent background information. These embellishments really are data about the learning opportunities, they explicate who is involved with the opportunities, and what information and services are relevant for them. Indeed, they are data about data, hence metadata. However, such a characterisation amounts to a tremendous underestimation of the power of such educational modelling languagesEditors: Laurence Vignollet (Universit<span>é de Savoie, France).https://jime.open.ac.uk/articles/144metadatalearning Objectslearning activitiesLearning Designsemantic webpedagogy guidelineseducational standardsdesign templatesadaptive eLearninguser modellingOpen Learning Management Systems.
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Peter B. Sloep
spellingShingle Peter B. Sloep
Preface to the special issue: "Comparing Educational Modelling Languages on the 'Planet Game' Case Study"
Journal of Interactive Media in Education
metadata
learning Objects
learning activities
Learning Design
semantic web
pedagogy guidelines
educational standards
design templates
adaptive eLearning
user modelling
Open Learning Management Systems.
author_facet Peter B. Sloep
author_sort Peter B. Sloep
title Preface to the special issue: "Comparing Educational Modelling Languages on the 'Planet Game' Case Study"
title_short Preface to the special issue: "Comparing Educational Modelling Languages on the 'Planet Game' Case Study"
title_full Preface to the special issue: "Comparing Educational Modelling Languages on the 'Planet Game' Case Study"
title_fullStr Preface to the special issue: "Comparing Educational Modelling Languages on the 'Planet Game' Case Study"
title_full_unstemmed Preface to the special issue: "Comparing Educational Modelling Languages on the 'Planet Game' Case Study"
title_sort preface to the special issue: "comparing educational modelling languages on the 'planet game' case study"
publisher Ubiquity Press
series Journal of Interactive Media in Education
issn 1365-893X
publishDate 2008-12-01
description People with a background in computer science tend to refer to technical specifications for designing learning as metadata standards. And strictly speaking, they are right. Such educational modelling languages, as specification languages for designing learning opportunities are generically called, take a collection of learning opportunities as its starting point and then 'embellishes' them by allotting to them students and staff in various roles, as well as pertinent background information. These embellishments really are data about the learning opportunities, they explicate who is involved with the opportunities, and what information and services are relevant for them. Indeed, they are data about data, hence metadata. However, such a characterisation amounts to a tremendous underestimation of the power of such educational modelling languagesEditors: Laurence Vignollet (Universit<span>é de Savoie, France).
topic metadata
learning Objects
learning activities
Learning Design
semantic web
pedagogy guidelines
educational standards
design templates
adaptive eLearning
user modelling
Open Learning Management Systems.
url https://jime.open.ac.uk/articles/144
work_keys_str_mv AT peterbsloep prefacetothespecialissuecomparingeducationalmodellinglanguagesontheplanetgamecasestudy
_version_ 1725388818707644416