Preface to the special issue: "Comparing Educational Modelling Languages on the 'Planet Game' Case Study"
People with a background in computer science tend to refer to technical specifications for designing learning as metadata standards. And strictly speaking, they are right. Such educational modelling languages, as specification languages for designing learning opportunities are generically called, ta...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Ubiquity Press
2008-12-01
|
Series: | Journal of Interactive Media in Education |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://jime.open.ac.uk/articles/144 |
id |
doaj-2d63016eb0d44f1492f045139286e9b8 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-2d63016eb0d44f1492f045139286e9b82020-11-25T00:14:44ZengUbiquity PressJournal of Interactive Media in Education1365-893X2008-12-012008210.5334/2008-17205Preface to the special issue: "Comparing Educational Modelling Languages on the 'Planet Game' Case Study"Peter B. Sloep0Programme Director Research & Development Technology Enhanced Learning. Centre for Learning Sciences and Technologies (CELSTEC), formely OTEC. The Open University of the Netherlands, Valkenburgerweg 177. 6419 AT HeerlenPeople with a background in computer science tend to refer to technical specifications for designing learning as metadata standards. And strictly speaking, they are right. Such educational modelling languages, as specification languages for designing learning opportunities are generically called, take a collection of learning opportunities as its starting point and then 'embellishes' them by allotting to them students and staff in various roles, as well as pertinent background information. These embellishments really are data about the learning opportunities, they explicate who is involved with the opportunities, and what information and services are relevant for them. Indeed, they are data about data, hence metadata. However, such a characterisation amounts to a tremendous underestimation of the power of such educational modelling languagesEditors: Laurence Vignollet (Universit<span>é de Savoie, France).https://jime.open.ac.uk/articles/144metadatalearning Objectslearning activitiesLearning Designsemantic webpedagogy guidelineseducational standardsdesign templatesadaptive eLearninguser modellingOpen Learning Management Systems. |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Peter B. Sloep |
spellingShingle |
Peter B. Sloep Preface to the special issue: "Comparing Educational Modelling Languages on the 'Planet Game' Case Study" Journal of Interactive Media in Education metadata learning Objects learning activities Learning Design semantic web pedagogy guidelines educational standards design templates adaptive eLearning user modelling Open Learning Management Systems. |
author_facet |
Peter B. Sloep |
author_sort |
Peter B. Sloep |
title |
Preface to the special issue: "Comparing Educational Modelling Languages on the 'Planet Game' Case Study" |
title_short |
Preface to the special issue: "Comparing Educational Modelling Languages on the 'Planet Game' Case Study" |
title_full |
Preface to the special issue: "Comparing Educational Modelling Languages on the 'Planet Game' Case Study" |
title_fullStr |
Preface to the special issue: "Comparing Educational Modelling Languages on the 'Planet Game' Case Study" |
title_full_unstemmed |
Preface to the special issue: "Comparing Educational Modelling Languages on the 'Planet Game' Case Study" |
title_sort |
preface to the special issue: "comparing educational modelling languages on the 'planet game' case study" |
publisher |
Ubiquity Press |
series |
Journal of Interactive Media in Education |
issn |
1365-893X |
publishDate |
2008-12-01 |
description |
People with a background in computer science tend to refer to technical specifications for designing learning as metadata standards. And strictly speaking, they are right. Such educational modelling languages, as specification languages for designing learning opportunities are generically called, take a collection of learning opportunities as its starting point and then 'embellishes' them by allotting to them students and staff in various roles, as well as pertinent background information. These embellishments really are data about the learning opportunities, they explicate who is involved with the opportunities, and what information and services are relevant for them. Indeed, they are data about data, hence metadata. However, such a characterisation amounts to a tremendous underestimation of the power of such educational modelling languagesEditors: Laurence Vignollet (Universit<span>é de Savoie, France). |
topic |
metadata learning Objects learning activities Learning Design semantic web pedagogy guidelines educational standards design templates adaptive eLearning user modelling Open Learning Management Systems. |
url |
https://jime.open.ac.uk/articles/144 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT peterbsloep prefacetothespecialissuecomparingeducationalmodellinglanguagesontheplanetgamecasestudy |
_version_ |
1725388818707644416 |