Trophic partitioning among three littoral microcrustaceans: relative importance of periphyton as food resource

The high species richness of zooplankton communities in macrophytes littoral zones could result from the diversity of potential trophic niches found in such environment. In macrophytes littoral zones, in addition to phytoplankton, neustonic, benthic and epiphytic biofilms can also be potential compo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alexandre Bec, Gilles Bourdier, Hélène Masclaux
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: PAGEPress Publications 2012-07-01
Series:Journal of Limnology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jlimnol.it/index.php/jlimnol/article/view/477
id doaj-2d57c90872cf47f18cd3256230bd55ec
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2d57c90872cf47f18cd3256230bd55ec2020-11-25T01:25:05ZengPAGEPress PublicationsJournal of Limnology1129-57671723-86332012-07-01712e28e2810.4081/jlimnol.2012.e28Trophic partitioning among three littoral microcrustaceans: relative importance of periphyton as food resourceAlexandre BecGilles BourdierHélène MasclauxThe high species richness of zooplankton communities in macrophytes littoral zones could result from the diversity of potential trophic niches found in such environment. In macrophytes littoral zones, in addition to phytoplankton, neustonic, benthic and epiphytic biofilms can also be potential components of the microcrustacean diet. Here, we investigated the ability of three large cladocerans: Daphnia longispina, Simocephalus vetulus and Eurycercus lamellatus, to develop on periphyton as their only food source or as a complement to a phytoplankton resource in scarce supply. D. longispina exhibited a very low growth and reproduction rates on the periphytic resource and as S. vetulus seems unable to scrape on periphyton. In contrast, E. lamellatus could not grow on phytoplankton, and appears to be an obligatory periphyton scraper. This latter finding contrasts with previous studies suggesting that E. lamellatus could be able to scrap periphyton as well as filter-feed on suspended matter. These differences in feeding strategy probably reflect the different trophic niches occupied by these three species in macrophytes littoral zones, and may explain at least in part their ability to coexist in the same environment.http://www.jlimnol.it/index.php/jlimnol/article/view/477feeding behavior, food resources, trophic niches, periphyton
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Alexandre Bec
Gilles Bourdier
Hélène Masclaux
spellingShingle Alexandre Bec
Gilles Bourdier
Hélène Masclaux
Trophic partitioning among three littoral microcrustaceans: relative importance of periphyton as food resource
Journal of Limnology
feeding behavior, food resources, trophic niches, periphyton
author_facet Alexandre Bec
Gilles Bourdier
Hélène Masclaux
author_sort Alexandre Bec
title Trophic partitioning among three littoral microcrustaceans: relative importance of periphyton as food resource
title_short Trophic partitioning among three littoral microcrustaceans: relative importance of periphyton as food resource
title_full Trophic partitioning among three littoral microcrustaceans: relative importance of periphyton as food resource
title_fullStr Trophic partitioning among three littoral microcrustaceans: relative importance of periphyton as food resource
title_full_unstemmed Trophic partitioning among three littoral microcrustaceans: relative importance of periphyton as food resource
title_sort trophic partitioning among three littoral microcrustaceans: relative importance of periphyton as food resource
publisher PAGEPress Publications
series Journal of Limnology
issn 1129-5767
1723-8633
publishDate 2012-07-01
description The high species richness of zooplankton communities in macrophytes littoral zones could result from the diversity of potential trophic niches found in such environment. In macrophytes littoral zones, in addition to phytoplankton, neustonic, benthic and epiphytic biofilms can also be potential components of the microcrustacean diet. Here, we investigated the ability of three large cladocerans: Daphnia longispina, Simocephalus vetulus and Eurycercus lamellatus, to develop on periphyton as their only food source or as a complement to a phytoplankton resource in scarce supply. D. longispina exhibited a very low growth and reproduction rates on the periphytic resource and as S. vetulus seems unable to scrape on periphyton. In contrast, E. lamellatus could not grow on phytoplankton, and appears to be an obligatory periphyton scraper. This latter finding contrasts with previous studies suggesting that E. lamellatus could be able to scrap periphyton as well as filter-feed on suspended matter. These differences in feeding strategy probably reflect the different trophic niches occupied by these three species in macrophytes littoral zones, and may explain at least in part their ability to coexist in the same environment.
topic feeding behavior, food resources, trophic niches, periphyton
url http://www.jlimnol.it/index.php/jlimnol/article/view/477
work_keys_str_mv AT alexandrebec trophicpartitioningamongthreelittoralmicrocrustaceansrelativeimportanceofperiphytonasfoodresource
AT gillesbourdier trophicpartitioningamongthreelittoralmicrocrustaceansrelativeimportanceofperiphytonasfoodresource
AT helenemasclaux trophicpartitioningamongthreelittoralmicrocrustaceansrelativeimportanceofperiphytonasfoodresource
_version_ 1725115281098932224