Pathological features and outcomes of incidental renal cell carcinoma in candidate solid organ donors
Background : We report the findings of a single Italian center in the evaluation of renal lesions in deceased donors from 2001 to 2017. In risk evaluation, we applied the current Italian guidelines, which include donors with small (< 4 cm, stage pT1a) renal carcinomas in the category of non-stand...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
The Korean Society of Nephrology
2020-12-01
|
Series: | Kidney Research and Clinical Practice |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.23876/j.krcp.20.050 |
id |
doaj-2d5214e9a7dd4d74a4904d21d4e0d31b |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-2d5214e9a7dd4d74a4904d21d4e0d31b2020-12-29T12:41:13ZengThe Korean Society of NephrologyKidney Research and Clinical Practice2211-91322020-12-0139448749410.23876/j.krcp.20.050j.krcp.20.050Pathological features and outcomes of incidental renal cell carcinoma in candidate solid organ donorsFrancesca Ambrosi0Costantino Ricci1Deborah Malvi2Carlo De Cillia3Matteo Ravaioli4Michelangelo Fiorentino5Massimo Cardillo6Francesco Vasuri7Antonia D'Errico8Pathology Unit, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, ItalyPathology Unit, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, ItalyPathology Unit, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, ItalyEmilia-Romagna Transplant Reference Centre, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, ItalyTransplant Surgery Unit, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, ItalyPathology Unit, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, ItalyCentro Nazionale Trapianti, Roma, ItalyPathology Unit, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, ItalyPathology Unit, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, ItalyBackground : We report the findings of a single Italian center in the evaluation of renal lesions in deceased donors from 2001 to 2017. In risk evaluation, we applied the current Italian guidelines, which include donors with small (< 4 cm, stage pT1a) renal carcinomas in the category of non-standard donors with a negligible risk of cancer transmission. Methods : From the revision of our registries, 2,406 donors were considered in the Emilia Romagna region of Italy; organs were accepted from 1,321 individuals for a total of 3,406 organs. Results : The evaluation of donor safety required frozen section analysis for 51 donors, in which a renal suspicious lesion was detected by ultrasound. Thirty-two primary renal tumors were finally diagnosed: 26 identified by frozen sections and 6 in discarded kidneys. The 32 tumors included 13 clear cell renal cell carcinomas (RCCs), 6 papillary RCCs, 6 angiomyolipomas, 5 oncocytomas, 1 chromophobe RCC, and 1 papillary adenoma. No cases of tumor transmission were recorded in follow-up of the recipients. Conclusion : Donors with small RCCs can be accepted to increase the donor pool. Collaboration in a multidisciplinary setting is fundamental to accurately evaluate donor candidate risk assessment and to improve standardized protocols for surgeons and pathologists.https://doi.org/10.23876/j.krcp.20.050cancer transmissiondonor evaluationkidney transplantationrenal cell carcinomarisk assessment |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Francesca Ambrosi Costantino Ricci Deborah Malvi Carlo De Cillia Matteo Ravaioli Michelangelo Fiorentino Massimo Cardillo Francesco Vasuri Antonia D'Errico |
spellingShingle |
Francesca Ambrosi Costantino Ricci Deborah Malvi Carlo De Cillia Matteo Ravaioli Michelangelo Fiorentino Massimo Cardillo Francesco Vasuri Antonia D'Errico Pathological features and outcomes of incidental renal cell carcinoma in candidate solid organ donors Kidney Research and Clinical Practice cancer transmission donor evaluation kidney transplantation renal cell carcinoma risk assessment |
author_facet |
Francesca Ambrosi Costantino Ricci Deborah Malvi Carlo De Cillia Matteo Ravaioli Michelangelo Fiorentino Massimo Cardillo Francesco Vasuri Antonia D'Errico |
author_sort |
Francesca Ambrosi |
title |
Pathological features and outcomes of incidental renal cell carcinoma in candidate solid organ donors |
title_short |
Pathological features and outcomes of incidental renal cell carcinoma in candidate solid organ donors |
title_full |
Pathological features and outcomes of incidental renal cell carcinoma in candidate solid organ donors |
title_fullStr |
Pathological features and outcomes of incidental renal cell carcinoma in candidate solid organ donors |
title_full_unstemmed |
Pathological features and outcomes of incidental renal cell carcinoma in candidate solid organ donors |
title_sort |
pathological features and outcomes of incidental renal cell carcinoma in candidate solid organ donors |
publisher |
The Korean Society of Nephrology |
series |
Kidney Research and Clinical Practice |
issn |
2211-9132 |
publishDate |
2020-12-01 |
description |
Background : We report the findings of a single Italian center in the evaluation of renal lesions in deceased donors from 2001 to 2017. In risk evaluation, we applied the current Italian guidelines, which include donors with small (< 4 cm, stage pT1a) renal carcinomas in the category of non-standard donors with a negligible risk of cancer transmission. Methods : From the revision of our registries, 2,406 donors were considered in the Emilia Romagna region of Italy; organs were accepted from 1,321 individuals for a total of 3,406 organs. Results : The evaluation of donor safety required frozen section analysis for 51 donors, in which a renal suspicious lesion was detected by ultrasound. Thirty-two primary renal tumors were finally diagnosed: 26 identified by frozen sections and 6 in discarded kidneys. The 32 tumors included 13 clear cell renal cell carcinomas (RCCs), 6 papillary RCCs, 6 angiomyolipomas, 5 oncocytomas, 1 chromophobe RCC, and 1 papillary adenoma. No cases of tumor transmission were recorded in follow-up of the recipients. Conclusion : Donors with small RCCs can be accepted to increase the donor pool. Collaboration in a multidisciplinary setting is fundamental to accurately evaluate donor candidate risk assessment and to improve standardized protocols for surgeons and pathologists. |
topic |
cancer transmission donor evaluation kidney transplantation renal cell carcinoma risk assessment |
url |
https://doi.org/10.23876/j.krcp.20.050 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT francescaambrosi pathologicalfeaturesandoutcomesofincidentalrenalcellcarcinomaincandidatesolidorgandonors AT costantinoricci pathologicalfeaturesandoutcomesofincidentalrenalcellcarcinomaincandidatesolidorgandonors AT deborahmalvi pathologicalfeaturesandoutcomesofincidentalrenalcellcarcinomaincandidatesolidorgandonors AT carlodecillia pathologicalfeaturesandoutcomesofincidentalrenalcellcarcinomaincandidatesolidorgandonors AT matteoravaioli pathologicalfeaturesandoutcomesofincidentalrenalcellcarcinomaincandidatesolidorgandonors AT michelangelofiorentino pathologicalfeaturesandoutcomesofincidentalrenalcellcarcinomaincandidatesolidorgandonors AT massimocardillo pathologicalfeaturesandoutcomesofincidentalrenalcellcarcinomaincandidatesolidorgandonors AT francescovasuri pathologicalfeaturesandoutcomesofincidentalrenalcellcarcinomaincandidatesolidorgandonors AT antoniaderrico pathologicalfeaturesandoutcomesofincidentalrenalcellcarcinomaincandidatesolidorgandonors |
_version_ |
1724367680093290496 |