The trade-off between morphology and control in the co-optimized design of robots.
Conventionally, robot morphologies are developed through simulations and calculations, and different control methods are applied afterwards. Assuming that simulations and predictions are simplified representations of our reality, how sure can roboticists be that the chosen morphology is the most ade...
Main Authors: | Andre Rosendo, Marco von Atzigen, Fumiya Iida |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2017-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5638323?pdf=render |
Similar Items
-
Bootstrapping Virtual Bipedal Walkers with Robotics Scaffolded Learning
by: Jiahui Zhu, et al.
Published: (2021-09-01) -
Morphological Evolution of Physical Robots through Model-Free Phenotype Development.
by: Luzius Brodbeck, et al.
Published: (2015-01-01) -
Trade-off between Design and Control for Recycle Process
by: Yu-Chang Cheng, et al.
Published: (2002) -
Trade-off between morphological convergence and opportunistic diet behavior in fish hybrid zone
by: Grey Jonathan, et al.
Published: (2009-10-01) -
Minimalistic Control of a Compass Gait Robot in Rough Terrain
by: Iida, Fumiya, et al.
Published: (2010)