Electrophysiological Response to the Informative Value of Feedback Revealed in a Segmented Wisconsin Card Sorting Test

Feedback has two main components. One is valence that indicates the wrong or correct behavior, and the other is the informative value that refers to what we can learn from feedback. Aimed to explore the neural distinction of these two components, we provided participants with a segmented Wisconsin C...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fuhong Li, Jing Wang, Bin Du, Bihua Cao
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-02-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00057/full
id doaj-2d3080354e4e4220aede992c276b419b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2d3080354e4e4220aede992c276b419b2020-11-24T22:34:40ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782018-02-01910.3389/fpsyg.2018.00057302398Electrophysiological Response to the Informative Value of Feedback Revealed in a Segmented Wisconsin Card Sorting TestFuhong Li0Fuhong Li1Jing Wang2Bin Du3Bihua Cao4Advanced Research Institute, Chengdu University, Chengdu, ChinaSchool of Psychology, Jiangxi Normal University, Nanchang, ChinaSchool of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing, ChinaSchool of Psychology, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian, ChinaSchool of Psychology, Jiangxi Normal University, Nanchang, ChinaFeedback has two main components. One is valence that indicates the wrong or correct behavior, and the other is the informative value that refers to what we can learn from feedback. Aimed to explore the neural distinction of these two components, we provided participants with a segmented Wisconsin Card Sorting Task, in which they received either positive or negative feedback at different steps. The informative value was manipulated in terms of the order of feedback presentation. The results of event-related potentials time-locked to the feedback presentation confirmed that valence of feedback was processed in a broad epoch, especially in the time window of feedback-related negativity (FRN), reflecting detection of correct or wrong card sorting behavior. In contrast, the informative value of positive and negative feedback was mainly processed in the P300, possibly reflecting information updating or hypothesis revision. These findings provide new evidence that informative values of feedback are processed by cognitive systems that differ from those of feedback valence.http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00057/fullfeedbackrule acquisitioninformative valuevalenceP300
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Fuhong Li
Fuhong Li
Jing Wang
Bin Du
Bihua Cao
spellingShingle Fuhong Li
Fuhong Li
Jing Wang
Bin Du
Bihua Cao
Electrophysiological Response to the Informative Value of Feedback Revealed in a Segmented Wisconsin Card Sorting Test
Frontiers in Psychology
feedback
rule acquisition
informative value
valence
P300
author_facet Fuhong Li
Fuhong Li
Jing Wang
Bin Du
Bihua Cao
author_sort Fuhong Li
title Electrophysiological Response to the Informative Value of Feedback Revealed in a Segmented Wisconsin Card Sorting Test
title_short Electrophysiological Response to the Informative Value of Feedback Revealed in a Segmented Wisconsin Card Sorting Test
title_full Electrophysiological Response to the Informative Value of Feedback Revealed in a Segmented Wisconsin Card Sorting Test
title_fullStr Electrophysiological Response to the Informative Value of Feedback Revealed in a Segmented Wisconsin Card Sorting Test
title_full_unstemmed Electrophysiological Response to the Informative Value of Feedback Revealed in a Segmented Wisconsin Card Sorting Test
title_sort electrophysiological response to the informative value of feedback revealed in a segmented wisconsin card sorting test
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2018-02-01
description Feedback has two main components. One is valence that indicates the wrong or correct behavior, and the other is the informative value that refers to what we can learn from feedback. Aimed to explore the neural distinction of these two components, we provided participants with a segmented Wisconsin Card Sorting Task, in which they received either positive or negative feedback at different steps. The informative value was manipulated in terms of the order of feedback presentation. The results of event-related potentials time-locked to the feedback presentation confirmed that valence of feedback was processed in a broad epoch, especially in the time window of feedback-related negativity (FRN), reflecting detection of correct or wrong card sorting behavior. In contrast, the informative value of positive and negative feedback was mainly processed in the P300, possibly reflecting information updating or hypothesis revision. These findings provide new evidence that informative values of feedback are processed by cognitive systems that differ from those of feedback valence.
topic feedback
rule acquisition
informative value
valence
P300
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00057/full
work_keys_str_mv AT fuhongli electrophysiologicalresponsetotheinformativevalueoffeedbackrevealedinasegmentedwisconsincardsortingtest
AT fuhongli electrophysiologicalresponsetotheinformativevalueoffeedbackrevealedinasegmentedwisconsincardsortingtest
AT jingwang electrophysiologicalresponsetotheinformativevalueoffeedbackrevealedinasegmentedwisconsincardsortingtest
AT bindu electrophysiologicalresponsetotheinformativevalueoffeedbackrevealedinasegmentedwisconsincardsortingtest
AT bihuacao electrophysiologicalresponsetotheinformativevalueoffeedbackrevealedinasegmentedwisconsincardsortingtest
_version_ 1725726030952398848