Artificial intelligence for interpretation of segments of whole body MRI in CNO: pilot study comparing radiologists versus machine learning algorithm
Abstract Background To initiate the development of a machine learning algorithm capable of comparing segments of pre and post pamidronate whole body MRI scans to assess treatment response and to compare the results of this algorithm with the analysis of a panel of paediatric radiologists. Methods Wh...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2020-06-01
|
Series: | Pediatric Rheumatology Online Journal |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12969-020-00442-9 |
id |
doaj-2d2cd23121054d20846fa3d5b9b08687 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-2d2cd23121054d20846fa3d5b9b086872020-11-25T03:54:26ZengBMCPediatric Rheumatology Online Journal1546-00962020-06-011811610.1186/s12969-020-00442-9Artificial intelligence for interpretation of segments of whole body MRI in CNO: pilot study comparing radiologists versus machine learning algorithmChandrika S. Bhat0Mark Chopra1Savvas Andronikou2Suvadip Paul3Zach Wener-Fligner4Anna Merkoulovitch5Izidora Holjar-Erlic6Flavia Menegotto7Ewan Simpson8David Grier9Athimalaipet V. Ramanan10Paediatric Rheumatology Service, Rainbow Children’s HospitalDepartment of Paediatric Radiology, Bristol Royal Hospital for ChildrenDepartment of Paediatric Radiology, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia and University of PennsylvaniaStanford UniversityStanford University SCPDStanford University SCPDDepartment of Paediatric Radiology, Bristol Royal Hospital for ChildrenDepartment of Paediatric Radiology, Bristol Royal Hospital for ChildrenDepartment of Paediatric Radiology, Bristol Royal Hospital for ChildrenDepartment of Paediatric Radiology, Bristol Royal Hospital for ChildrenTranslational Health Sciences, University of BristolAbstract Background To initiate the development of a machine learning algorithm capable of comparing segments of pre and post pamidronate whole body MRI scans to assess treatment response and to compare the results of this algorithm with the analysis of a panel of paediatric radiologists. Methods Whole body MRI of patients under the age of 16 diagnosed with CNO and treated with pamidronate at a tertiary referral paediatric hospital in United Kingdom between 2005 and 2017 were reviewed. Pre and post pamidronate images of the commonest sites of involvement (distal femur and proximal tibia) were manually selected (n = 45). A machine learning algorithm was developed and tested to assess treatment effectiveness by comparing pre and post pamidronate scans. The results of this algorithm were compared with the results of a panel of radiologists (ground truth). Results When tested initially the machine algorithm predicted 4/7 (57.1%) examples correctly in the multi class model, and 5/7 (71.4%) correctly in the binary group. However when compared to the ground truth, the machine model was able to classify only 33.3% of the samples correctly but had a sensitivity of 100% in detecting improvement or worsening of disease. Conclusion The machine learning could detect new lesions or resolution of a lesion with good sensitivity but failed to classify stable disease accurately. However, further validation on larger datasets are required to improve the specificity and accuracy of the machine model.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12969-020-00442-9Whole body MRIPre- and post-pamidronate scanArtificial intelligence |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Chandrika S. Bhat Mark Chopra Savvas Andronikou Suvadip Paul Zach Wener-Fligner Anna Merkoulovitch Izidora Holjar-Erlic Flavia Menegotto Ewan Simpson David Grier Athimalaipet V. Ramanan |
spellingShingle |
Chandrika S. Bhat Mark Chopra Savvas Andronikou Suvadip Paul Zach Wener-Fligner Anna Merkoulovitch Izidora Holjar-Erlic Flavia Menegotto Ewan Simpson David Grier Athimalaipet V. Ramanan Artificial intelligence for interpretation of segments of whole body MRI in CNO: pilot study comparing radiologists versus machine learning algorithm Pediatric Rheumatology Online Journal Whole body MRI Pre- and post-pamidronate scan Artificial intelligence |
author_facet |
Chandrika S. Bhat Mark Chopra Savvas Andronikou Suvadip Paul Zach Wener-Fligner Anna Merkoulovitch Izidora Holjar-Erlic Flavia Menegotto Ewan Simpson David Grier Athimalaipet V. Ramanan |
author_sort |
Chandrika S. Bhat |
title |
Artificial intelligence for interpretation of segments of whole body MRI in CNO: pilot study comparing radiologists versus machine learning algorithm |
title_short |
Artificial intelligence for interpretation of segments of whole body MRI in CNO: pilot study comparing radiologists versus machine learning algorithm |
title_full |
Artificial intelligence for interpretation of segments of whole body MRI in CNO: pilot study comparing radiologists versus machine learning algorithm |
title_fullStr |
Artificial intelligence for interpretation of segments of whole body MRI in CNO: pilot study comparing radiologists versus machine learning algorithm |
title_full_unstemmed |
Artificial intelligence for interpretation of segments of whole body MRI in CNO: pilot study comparing radiologists versus machine learning algorithm |
title_sort |
artificial intelligence for interpretation of segments of whole body mri in cno: pilot study comparing radiologists versus machine learning algorithm |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
Pediatric Rheumatology Online Journal |
issn |
1546-0096 |
publishDate |
2020-06-01 |
description |
Abstract Background To initiate the development of a machine learning algorithm capable of comparing segments of pre and post pamidronate whole body MRI scans to assess treatment response and to compare the results of this algorithm with the analysis of a panel of paediatric radiologists. Methods Whole body MRI of patients under the age of 16 diagnosed with CNO and treated with pamidronate at a tertiary referral paediatric hospital in United Kingdom between 2005 and 2017 were reviewed. Pre and post pamidronate images of the commonest sites of involvement (distal femur and proximal tibia) were manually selected (n = 45). A machine learning algorithm was developed and tested to assess treatment effectiveness by comparing pre and post pamidronate scans. The results of this algorithm were compared with the results of a panel of radiologists (ground truth). Results When tested initially the machine algorithm predicted 4/7 (57.1%) examples correctly in the multi class model, and 5/7 (71.4%) correctly in the binary group. However when compared to the ground truth, the machine model was able to classify only 33.3% of the samples correctly but had a sensitivity of 100% in detecting improvement or worsening of disease. Conclusion The machine learning could detect new lesions or resolution of a lesion with good sensitivity but failed to classify stable disease accurately. However, further validation on larger datasets are required to improve the specificity and accuracy of the machine model. |
topic |
Whole body MRI Pre- and post-pamidronate scan Artificial intelligence |
url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12969-020-00442-9 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT chandrikasbhat artificialintelligenceforinterpretationofsegmentsofwholebodymriincnopilotstudycomparingradiologistsversusmachinelearningalgorithm AT markchopra artificialintelligenceforinterpretationofsegmentsofwholebodymriincnopilotstudycomparingradiologistsversusmachinelearningalgorithm AT savvasandronikou artificialintelligenceforinterpretationofsegmentsofwholebodymriincnopilotstudycomparingradiologistsversusmachinelearningalgorithm AT suvadippaul artificialintelligenceforinterpretationofsegmentsofwholebodymriincnopilotstudycomparingradiologistsversusmachinelearningalgorithm AT zachwenerfligner artificialintelligenceforinterpretationofsegmentsofwholebodymriincnopilotstudycomparingradiologistsversusmachinelearningalgorithm AT annamerkoulovitch artificialintelligenceforinterpretationofsegmentsofwholebodymriincnopilotstudycomparingradiologistsversusmachinelearningalgorithm AT izidoraholjarerlic artificialintelligenceforinterpretationofsegmentsofwholebodymriincnopilotstudycomparingradiologistsversusmachinelearningalgorithm AT flaviamenegotto artificialintelligenceforinterpretationofsegmentsofwholebodymriincnopilotstudycomparingradiologistsversusmachinelearningalgorithm AT ewansimpson artificialintelligenceforinterpretationofsegmentsofwholebodymriincnopilotstudycomparingradiologistsversusmachinelearningalgorithm AT davidgrier artificialintelligenceforinterpretationofsegmentsofwholebodymriincnopilotstudycomparingradiologistsversusmachinelearningalgorithm AT athimalaipetvramanan artificialintelligenceforinterpretationofsegmentsofwholebodymriincnopilotstudycomparingradiologistsversusmachinelearningalgorithm |
_version_ |
1724473701007622144 |