The Effectiveness of “Two-Week” Referrals for Suspected Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcoma
The two-week wait” target introduced in 2000 requires that patients with suspected cancer referred by general practitioners should be seen within two weeks. We reviewed patients who had been referred under this standard to the North of England Bone and Soft Tissue Tumour Service, to determine if th...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Hindawi Limited
2007-01-01
|
Series: | Sarcoma |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2007/23870 |
id |
doaj-2d2cbf6f05c04bc48985000326d021d1 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-2d2cbf6f05c04bc48985000326d021d12020-11-24T22:34:26ZengHindawi LimitedSarcoma1357-714X1369-16432007-01-01200710.1155/2007/2387023870The Effectiveness of “Two-Week” Referrals for Suspected Bone and Soft Tissue SarcomaA. Malik0L. Wigney1S. Murray2C. H. Gerrand3North of England Bone and Soft Tissue Tumour Service, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne NE7 7DN, UKNorth of England Bone and Soft Tissue Tumour Service, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne NE7 7DN, UKNorth of England Bone and Soft Tissue Tumour Service, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne NE7 7DN, UKNorth of England Bone and Soft Tissue Tumour Service, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne NE7 7DN, UKThe two-week wait” target introduced in 2000 requires that patients with suspected cancer referred by general practitioners should be seen within two weeks. We reviewed patients who had been referred under this standard to the North of England Bone and Soft Tissue Tumour Service, to determine if the referral guidelines had been followed, and what proportion of patients referred under the guideline had malignant tumours. 40 patients were referred under the guideline between January 2004 and December 2005. Ten of these patients (2548%) had malignant tumours, compared with 243 of 507 (48%) of those referred from other sources. In 9 of the 40 cases, the patient did not meet the criteria for urgent referral. Although this target has focussed attention on shortening the time to diagnosis and treatment, prioritising patients referred from general practitioners has the potential to disadvantage those with malignant tumours referred from other sources.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2007/23870 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
A. Malik L. Wigney S. Murray C. H. Gerrand |
spellingShingle |
A. Malik L. Wigney S. Murray C. H. Gerrand The Effectiveness of “Two-Week” Referrals for Suspected Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcoma Sarcoma |
author_facet |
A. Malik L. Wigney S. Murray C. H. Gerrand |
author_sort |
A. Malik |
title |
The Effectiveness of “Two-Week” Referrals for Suspected Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcoma |
title_short |
The Effectiveness of “Two-Week” Referrals for Suspected Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcoma |
title_full |
The Effectiveness of “Two-Week” Referrals for Suspected Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcoma |
title_fullStr |
The Effectiveness of “Two-Week” Referrals for Suspected Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcoma |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Effectiveness of “Two-Week” Referrals for Suspected Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcoma |
title_sort |
effectiveness of “two-week” referrals for suspected bone and soft tissue sarcoma |
publisher |
Hindawi Limited |
series |
Sarcoma |
issn |
1357-714X 1369-1643 |
publishDate |
2007-01-01 |
description |
The two-week wait” target introduced in 2000 requires that patients with suspected cancer referred by general practitioners should be seen within two weeks. We reviewed patients who had been referred under this standard to the North of England Bone and Soft Tissue Tumour Service, to determine if the referral guidelines had been followed, and what proportion of patients referred under the guideline had malignant tumours. 40 patients were referred under the guideline between January 2004 and December 2005. Ten of these patients (2548%) had malignant tumours, compared with 243 of 507 (48%) of those referred from other sources. In 9 of the 40 cases, the patient did not meet the criteria for urgent referral. Although this target has focussed attention on shortening the time to diagnosis and treatment, prioritising patients referred from general practitioners has the potential to disadvantage those with malignant tumours referred from other sources. |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2007/23870 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT amalik theeffectivenessoftwoweekreferralsforsuspectedboneandsofttissuesarcoma AT lwigney theeffectivenessoftwoweekreferralsforsuspectedboneandsofttissuesarcoma AT smurray theeffectivenessoftwoweekreferralsforsuspectedboneandsofttissuesarcoma AT chgerrand theeffectivenessoftwoweekreferralsforsuspectedboneandsofttissuesarcoma AT amalik effectivenessoftwoweekreferralsforsuspectedboneandsofttissuesarcoma AT lwigney effectivenessoftwoweekreferralsforsuspectedboneandsofttissuesarcoma AT smurray effectivenessoftwoweekreferralsforsuspectedboneandsofttissuesarcoma AT chgerrand effectivenessoftwoweekreferralsforsuspectedboneandsofttissuesarcoma |
_version_ |
1725727547055931392 |