Evaluation of Marginal Misfit of Metal Frameworks Welded by Gas-Torch, Laser, and Tungsten Inert Gas Methods

Purpose. The objective of this study was to evaluate the marginal fit and the flexural resistance of nickel-chromium frameworks welded by different techniques, gas-torch, laser, and tungsten inert gas (TIG), compared with that of frameworks made via one-piece casting. Methods. To evaluate the margin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wilson Matsumoto, Paula Pastana Beraldo, Rossana Pereira de Almeida, Ana Paula Macedo, Beatriz Roque Kubata, Takami Hirono Hotta
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2018-01-01
Series:International Journal of Dentistry
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/9828929
id doaj-2d29bef137744f51a3c0734f37405200
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2d29bef137744f51a3c0734f374052002020-11-25T00:17:05ZengHindawi LimitedInternational Journal of Dentistry1687-87281687-87362018-01-01201810.1155/2018/98289299828929Evaluation of Marginal Misfit of Metal Frameworks Welded by Gas-Torch, Laser, and Tungsten Inert Gas MethodsWilson Matsumoto0Paula Pastana Beraldo1Rossana Pereira de Almeida2Ana Paula Macedo3Beatriz Roque Kubata4Takami Hirono Hotta5Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Dental School of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto 14040-904, BrazilPrivate Practice, Ribeirão Preto 14025-010, BrazilDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Dental School of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto 14040-904, BrazilDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Dental School of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto 14040-904, BrazilDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Dental School of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto 14040-904, BrazilDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Dental School of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto 14040-904, BrazilPurpose. The objective of this study was to evaluate the marginal fit and the flexural resistance of nickel-chromium frameworks welded by different techniques, gas-torch, laser, and tungsten inert gas (TIG), compared with that of frameworks made via one-piece casting. Methods. To evaluate the marginal fit, a master model was fabricated simulating four implants. Transfers and replicas were used to transfer the positions of the implants to the model, using a silicone matrix. The bars were waxed up and casted. Three assessments of misfit were performed for each implant using a stereomicroscope before and after welding in two predetermined regions, totaling six readings for each implant. To evaluate the flexural resistance, one group was made casting the specimens in one piece. Other 3 groups using gas-torch, laser, and TIG welding techniques were made after sectioned transversally. The data showed normal distribution and two-way ANOVA for marginal fit and one-way ANOVA for flexural resistance, and Tukey’s posttest (α=0.05) was performed. Results. For the marginal fit, the three welding methods presented similar results and were different from one-piece casting. For the flexural resistance, significant differences were observed among the studied groups (p<0.001), and the one-piece group presented higher resistance compared to the three welding techniques. Conclusions. Within the limits of this study, the three welding techniques yielded similar misfit results, and the laser and TIG techniques presented similar flexural resistance but lower than gas-torch and one-piece casting.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/9828929
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Wilson Matsumoto
Paula Pastana Beraldo
Rossana Pereira de Almeida
Ana Paula Macedo
Beatriz Roque Kubata
Takami Hirono Hotta
spellingShingle Wilson Matsumoto
Paula Pastana Beraldo
Rossana Pereira de Almeida
Ana Paula Macedo
Beatriz Roque Kubata
Takami Hirono Hotta
Evaluation of Marginal Misfit of Metal Frameworks Welded by Gas-Torch, Laser, and Tungsten Inert Gas Methods
International Journal of Dentistry
author_facet Wilson Matsumoto
Paula Pastana Beraldo
Rossana Pereira de Almeida
Ana Paula Macedo
Beatriz Roque Kubata
Takami Hirono Hotta
author_sort Wilson Matsumoto
title Evaluation of Marginal Misfit of Metal Frameworks Welded by Gas-Torch, Laser, and Tungsten Inert Gas Methods
title_short Evaluation of Marginal Misfit of Metal Frameworks Welded by Gas-Torch, Laser, and Tungsten Inert Gas Methods
title_full Evaluation of Marginal Misfit of Metal Frameworks Welded by Gas-Torch, Laser, and Tungsten Inert Gas Methods
title_fullStr Evaluation of Marginal Misfit of Metal Frameworks Welded by Gas-Torch, Laser, and Tungsten Inert Gas Methods
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Marginal Misfit of Metal Frameworks Welded by Gas-Torch, Laser, and Tungsten Inert Gas Methods
title_sort evaluation of marginal misfit of metal frameworks welded by gas-torch, laser, and tungsten inert gas methods
publisher Hindawi Limited
series International Journal of Dentistry
issn 1687-8728
1687-8736
publishDate 2018-01-01
description Purpose. The objective of this study was to evaluate the marginal fit and the flexural resistance of nickel-chromium frameworks welded by different techniques, gas-torch, laser, and tungsten inert gas (TIG), compared with that of frameworks made via one-piece casting. Methods. To evaluate the marginal fit, a master model was fabricated simulating four implants. Transfers and replicas were used to transfer the positions of the implants to the model, using a silicone matrix. The bars were waxed up and casted. Three assessments of misfit were performed for each implant using a stereomicroscope before and after welding in two predetermined regions, totaling six readings for each implant. To evaluate the flexural resistance, one group was made casting the specimens in one piece. Other 3 groups using gas-torch, laser, and TIG welding techniques were made after sectioned transversally. The data showed normal distribution and two-way ANOVA for marginal fit and one-way ANOVA for flexural resistance, and Tukey’s posttest (α=0.05) was performed. Results. For the marginal fit, the three welding methods presented similar results and were different from one-piece casting. For the flexural resistance, significant differences were observed among the studied groups (p<0.001), and the one-piece group presented higher resistance compared to the three welding techniques. Conclusions. Within the limits of this study, the three welding techniques yielded similar misfit results, and the laser and TIG techniques presented similar flexural resistance but lower than gas-torch and one-piece casting.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/9828929
work_keys_str_mv AT wilsonmatsumoto evaluationofmarginalmisfitofmetalframeworksweldedbygastorchlaserandtungsteninertgasmethods
AT paulapastanaberaldo evaluationofmarginalmisfitofmetalframeworksweldedbygastorchlaserandtungsteninertgasmethods
AT rossanapereiradealmeida evaluationofmarginalmisfitofmetalframeworksweldedbygastorchlaserandtungsteninertgasmethods
AT anapaulamacedo evaluationofmarginalmisfitofmetalframeworksweldedbygastorchlaserandtungsteninertgasmethods
AT beatrizroquekubata evaluationofmarginalmisfitofmetalframeworksweldedbygastorchlaserandtungsteninertgasmethods
AT takamihironohotta evaluationofmarginalmisfitofmetalframeworksweldedbygastorchlaserandtungsteninertgasmethods
_version_ 1725381061494439936