Audit pricing and nature of controlling shareholders: Evidence from France

This study examines whether auditors are employed as a monitoring mechanism to mitigate agency problems arising from different types of controlling shareholders. In a context of concentrated ownership and poor investor protection, controlling shareholders can easily expropriate wealth from minority...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chiraz Ben Ali, Cédric Lesage
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2013-03-01
Series:China Journal of Accounting Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755309112000299
id doaj-2d240d90d61f49dba555030c9ea1bee6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2d240d90d61f49dba555030c9ea1bee62020-11-25T00:14:25ZengElsevierChina Journal of Accounting Research1755-30912013-03-0161213410.1016/j.cjar.2012.08.002Audit pricing and nature of controlling shareholders: Evidence from FranceChiraz Ben Ali0Cédric Lesage1IPAG Business School, FranceHEC Paris, FranceThis study examines whether auditors are employed as a monitoring mechanism to mitigate agency problems arising from different types of controlling shareholders. In a context of concentrated ownership and poor investor protection, controlling shareholders can easily expropriate wealth from minority shareholders and profit from private benefits of control. However, this agency conflict has been rarely studied, as the most commonly assumed agency conflict occurs between managers and shareholders. Using an audit fee model derived from Simunic (1980), we study the impact of the nature of controlling shareholders on audit fees in French listed firms. Our results show: (1) a negative relationship between audit fees and government shareholdings; (2) a positive relationship between audit fees and institutional shareholdings; and (3) no relationship between audit fees and family shareholdings. These results illustrate the mixed effects of the nature of ownership on audit fees.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755309112000299Audit feesControlling shareholder identityMinority expropriationAgency conflict
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Chiraz Ben Ali
Cédric Lesage
spellingShingle Chiraz Ben Ali
Cédric Lesage
Audit pricing and nature of controlling shareholders: Evidence from France
China Journal of Accounting Research
Audit fees
Controlling shareholder identity
Minority expropriation
Agency conflict
author_facet Chiraz Ben Ali
Cédric Lesage
author_sort Chiraz Ben Ali
title Audit pricing and nature of controlling shareholders: Evidence from France
title_short Audit pricing and nature of controlling shareholders: Evidence from France
title_full Audit pricing and nature of controlling shareholders: Evidence from France
title_fullStr Audit pricing and nature of controlling shareholders: Evidence from France
title_full_unstemmed Audit pricing and nature of controlling shareholders: Evidence from France
title_sort audit pricing and nature of controlling shareholders: evidence from france
publisher Elsevier
series China Journal of Accounting Research
issn 1755-3091
publishDate 2013-03-01
description This study examines whether auditors are employed as a monitoring mechanism to mitigate agency problems arising from different types of controlling shareholders. In a context of concentrated ownership and poor investor protection, controlling shareholders can easily expropriate wealth from minority shareholders and profit from private benefits of control. However, this agency conflict has been rarely studied, as the most commonly assumed agency conflict occurs between managers and shareholders. Using an audit fee model derived from Simunic (1980), we study the impact of the nature of controlling shareholders on audit fees in French listed firms. Our results show: (1) a negative relationship between audit fees and government shareholdings; (2) a positive relationship between audit fees and institutional shareholdings; and (3) no relationship between audit fees and family shareholdings. These results illustrate the mixed effects of the nature of ownership on audit fees.
topic Audit fees
Controlling shareholder identity
Minority expropriation
Agency conflict
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755309112000299
work_keys_str_mv AT chirazbenali auditpricingandnatureofcontrollingshareholdersevidencefromfrance
AT cedriclesage auditpricingandnatureofcontrollingshareholdersevidencefromfrance
_version_ 1725390635339350016