Scientific Opinion on the substantiation of a health claim related to Transitech<sup>®</sup> and improvement of bowel function which is maintained after cessation of consumption of the food pursuant to Article 13(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006

Following an application from Vivatech, submitted for authorisation of a health claim pursuant to Article 13(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 via the Competent Authority of France, the EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies (NDA) was asked to deliver an opinion on the scientific...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies (NDA)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2013-06-01
Series:EFSA Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/efsajournal/doc/3258.pdf
Description
Summary:Following an application from Vivatech, submitted for authorisation of a health claim pursuant to Article 13(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 via the Competent Authority of France, the EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies (NDA) was asked to deliver an opinion on the scientific substantiation of a health claim related to Transitech® and improvement of bowel function which is maintained after cessation of consumption of the food. The food, Transitech®, that is the subject of the health claim is sufficiently characterised. The claimed effect, improvement of bowel function which is maintained after cessation of consumption of the food, is a beneficial physiological effect. In weighing the evidence, the Panel considered that the one study that investigated the claimed effect did not show an effect of Transitech® on bowel function which is maintained after cessation of consumption of the food. A cause and effect relationship has not been established between the consumption of Transitech® and improvement of bowel function which is maintained after cessation of consumption of the food.
ISSN:1831-4732