Fission Product Transport and Source Terms in HTRs: Experience from AVR Pebble Bed Reactor

Fission products deposited in the coolant circuit outside of the active core play a dominant role in source term estimations for advanced small pebble bed HTRs, particularly in design basis accidents (DBA). The deposited fission products may be released in depressurization accidents because present...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Rainer Moormann
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2008-01-01
Series:Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2008/597491
id doaj-2cf74b994e404929a5083cb16c56c5bb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2cf74b994e404929a5083cb16c56c5bb2020-11-25T01:01:17ZengHindawi LimitedScience and Technology of Nuclear Installations1687-60751687-60832008-01-01200810.1155/2008/597491597491Fission Product Transport and Source Terms in HTRs: Experience from AVR Pebble Bed ReactorRainer Moormann0Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Institute of Energy Research IEF-6, 52425 Jülich, GermanyFission products deposited in the coolant circuit outside of the active core play a dominant role in source term estimations for advanced small pebble bed HTRs, particularly in design basis accidents (DBA). The deposited fission products may be released in depressurization accidents because present pebble bed HTR concepts abstain from a gas tight containment. Contamination of the circuit also hinders maintenance work. Experiments, performed from 1972 to 88 on the AVR, an experimental pebble bed HTR, allow for a deeper insight into fission product transport behavior. The activity deposition per coolant pass was lower than expected and was influenced by fission product chemistry and by presence of carbonaceous dust. The latter lead also to inconsistencies between Cs plate out experiments in laboratory and in AVR. The deposition behavior of Ag was in line with present models. Dust as activity carrier is of safety relevance because of its mobility and of its sorption capability for fission products. All metal surfaces in pebble bed reactors were covered by a carbonaceous dust layer. Dust in AVR was produced by abrasion in amounts of about 5 kg/y. Additional dust sources in AVR were ours oil ingress and peeling of fuel element surfaces due to an air ingress. Dust has a size of about 1  𝜇m, consists mainly of graphite, is partly remobilized by flow perturbations, and deposits with time constants of 1 to 2 hours. In future reactors, an efficient filtering via a gas tight containment is required because accidents with fast depressurizations induce dust mobilization. Enhanced core temperatures in normal operation as in AVR and broken fuel pebbles have to be considered, as inflammable dust concentrations in the gas phase.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2008/597491
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Rainer Moormann
spellingShingle Rainer Moormann
Fission Product Transport and Source Terms in HTRs: Experience from AVR Pebble Bed Reactor
Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations
author_facet Rainer Moormann
author_sort Rainer Moormann
title Fission Product Transport and Source Terms in HTRs: Experience from AVR Pebble Bed Reactor
title_short Fission Product Transport and Source Terms in HTRs: Experience from AVR Pebble Bed Reactor
title_full Fission Product Transport and Source Terms in HTRs: Experience from AVR Pebble Bed Reactor
title_fullStr Fission Product Transport and Source Terms in HTRs: Experience from AVR Pebble Bed Reactor
title_full_unstemmed Fission Product Transport and Source Terms in HTRs: Experience from AVR Pebble Bed Reactor
title_sort fission product transport and source terms in htrs: experience from avr pebble bed reactor
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations
issn 1687-6075
1687-6083
publishDate 2008-01-01
description Fission products deposited in the coolant circuit outside of the active core play a dominant role in source term estimations for advanced small pebble bed HTRs, particularly in design basis accidents (DBA). The deposited fission products may be released in depressurization accidents because present pebble bed HTR concepts abstain from a gas tight containment. Contamination of the circuit also hinders maintenance work. Experiments, performed from 1972 to 88 on the AVR, an experimental pebble bed HTR, allow for a deeper insight into fission product transport behavior. The activity deposition per coolant pass was lower than expected and was influenced by fission product chemistry and by presence of carbonaceous dust. The latter lead also to inconsistencies between Cs plate out experiments in laboratory and in AVR. The deposition behavior of Ag was in line with present models. Dust as activity carrier is of safety relevance because of its mobility and of its sorption capability for fission products. All metal surfaces in pebble bed reactors were covered by a carbonaceous dust layer. Dust in AVR was produced by abrasion in amounts of about 5 kg/y. Additional dust sources in AVR were ours oil ingress and peeling of fuel element surfaces due to an air ingress. Dust has a size of about 1  𝜇m, consists mainly of graphite, is partly remobilized by flow perturbations, and deposits with time constants of 1 to 2 hours. In future reactors, an efficient filtering via a gas tight containment is required because accidents with fast depressurizations induce dust mobilization. Enhanced core temperatures in normal operation as in AVR and broken fuel pebbles have to be considered, as inflammable dust concentrations in the gas phase.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2008/597491
work_keys_str_mv AT rainermoormann fissionproducttransportandsourcetermsinhtrsexperiencefromavrpebblebedreactor
_version_ 1725209708154847232