Do gynecologic oncology patients with severely diminished renal function and urinary tract obstruction benefit from ureteral stenting or percutaneous nephrostomy?

Objective: To assess the renal outcomes of gynecologic oncology patients who present with hydronephrosis and acute kidney injury (AKI), have <20% renal function on diuretic renal scintigraphy, and undergo placement of a ureteral stent or percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN) tube. Methods: This is a sin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Brooke Liang, Sara S. Lange, L. Stewart Massad, Rebecca Dick, Kathryn A. Mills, Andrea R. Hagemann, Carolyn K. McCourt, Premal H. Thaker, Katherine C. Fuh, David G. Mutch, Matthew A. Powell, Lindsay M. Kuroki
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2019-05-01
Series:Gynecologic Oncology Reports
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352578919300463
id doaj-2cd6c6e0636948f695534ff5602b8a90
record_format Article
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Brooke Liang
Sara S. Lange
L. Stewart Massad
Rebecca Dick
Kathryn A. Mills
Andrea R. Hagemann
Carolyn K. McCourt
Premal H. Thaker
Katherine C. Fuh
David G. Mutch
Matthew A. Powell
Lindsay M. Kuroki
spellingShingle Brooke Liang
Sara S. Lange
L. Stewart Massad
Rebecca Dick
Kathryn A. Mills
Andrea R. Hagemann
Carolyn K. McCourt
Premal H. Thaker
Katherine C. Fuh
David G. Mutch
Matthew A. Powell
Lindsay M. Kuroki
Do gynecologic oncology patients with severely diminished renal function and urinary tract obstruction benefit from ureteral stenting or percutaneous nephrostomy?
Gynecologic Oncology Reports
author_facet Brooke Liang
Sara S. Lange
L. Stewart Massad
Rebecca Dick
Kathryn A. Mills
Andrea R. Hagemann
Carolyn K. McCourt
Premal H. Thaker
Katherine C. Fuh
David G. Mutch
Matthew A. Powell
Lindsay M. Kuroki
author_sort Brooke Liang
title Do gynecologic oncology patients with severely diminished renal function and urinary tract obstruction benefit from ureteral stenting or percutaneous nephrostomy?
title_short Do gynecologic oncology patients with severely diminished renal function and urinary tract obstruction benefit from ureteral stenting or percutaneous nephrostomy?
title_full Do gynecologic oncology patients with severely diminished renal function and urinary tract obstruction benefit from ureteral stenting or percutaneous nephrostomy?
title_fullStr Do gynecologic oncology patients with severely diminished renal function and urinary tract obstruction benefit from ureteral stenting or percutaneous nephrostomy?
title_full_unstemmed Do gynecologic oncology patients with severely diminished renal function and urinary tract obstruction benefit from ureteral stenting or percutaneous nephrostomy?
title_sort do gynecologic oncology patients with severely diminished renal function and urinary tract obstruction benefit from ureteral stenting or percutaneous nephrostomy?
publisher Elsevier
series Gynecologic Oncology Reports
issn 2352-5789
publishDate 2019-05-01
description Objective: To assess the renal outcomes of gynecologic oncology patients who present with hydronephrosis and acute kidney injury (AKI), have <20% renal function on diuretic renal scintigraphy, and undergo placement of a ureteral stent or percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN) tube. Methods: This is a single-institution case series of gynecologic oncology patients who underwent diuretic renal scintigraphy from January 1, 2007, to June 1, 2017. Univariate and multivariate logistic analyses were used to assess predictors of <20% renal function. Recovery from AKI or elevated creatinine was reported for women with <20% renal function who received a unilateral ureteral stent or PCN tube on the same side as their more compromised kidney. Results: Among 353 gynecologic oncology patients who underwent diuretic renal scintigraphy, 58 (16%) had renal function <20%. Mean age was 59.6 years, 17% had preexisting chronic kidney disease, and 44% had a diagnosis of cervical cancer. Renal atrophy on computed tomography scan (aOR 18.24, 95% CI 1.21–274.92) predicted renal function <20%. Of 10 women with <20% renal function who received a stent or PCN tube, 7 recovered from AKI or elevated creatinine. Conclusions: Gynecologic oncology patients with <20% renal function may recover from AKI after placement of a stent or PCN tube, indicating that a diuretic renal scintigraphy cutoff of <20% renal function may be overly conservative. Future studies are warranted to determine optimal renal function cutoffs for stent/PCN tube placement in gynecologic oncology patients. Keywords: Urinary tract obstruction, Gynecologic oncology, Diuretic renal scintigraphy, Ureteral stent, Percutaneous nephrostomy tube
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352578919300463
work_keys_str_mv AT brookeliang dogynecologiconcologypatientswithseverelydiminishedrenalfunctionandurinarytractobstructionbenefitfromureteralstentingorpercutaneousnephrostomy
AT saraslange dogynecologiconcologypatientswithseverelydiminishedrenalfunctionandurinarytractobstructionbenefitfromureteralstentingorpercutaneousnephrostomy
AT lstewartmassad dogynecologiconcologypatientswithseverelydiminishedrenalfunctionandurinarytractobstructionbenefitfromureteralstentingorpercutaneousnephrostomy
AT rebeccadick dogynecologiconcologypatientswithseverelydiminishedrenalfunctionandurinarytractobstructionbenefitfromureteralstentingorpercutaneousnephrostomy
AT kathrynamills dogynecologiconcologypatientswithseverelydiminishedrenalfunctionandurinarytractobstructionbenefitfromureteralstentingorpercutaneousnephrostomy
AT andrearhagemann dogynecologiconcologypatientswithseverelydiminishedrenalfunctionandurinarytractobstructionbenefitfromureteralstentingorpercutaneousnephrostomy
AT carolynkmccourt dogynecologiconcologypatientswithseverelydiminishedrenalfunctionandurinarytractobstructionbenefitfromureteralstentingorpercutaneousnephrostomy
AT premalhthaker dogynecologiconcologypatientswithseverelydiminishedrenalfunctionandurinarytractobstructionbenefitfromureteralstentingorpercutaneousnephrostomy
AT katherinecfuh dogynecologiconcologypatientswithseverelydiminishedrenalfunctionandurinarytractobstructionbenefitfromureteralstentingorpercutaneousnephrostomy
AT davidgmutch dogynecologiconcologypatientswithseverelydiminishedrenalfunctionandurinarytractobstructionbenefitfromureteralstentingorpercutaneousnephrostomy
AT matthewapowell dogynecologiconcologypatientswithseverelydiminishedrenalfunctionandurinarytractobstructionbenefitfromureteralstentingorpercutaneousnephrostomy
AT lindsaymkuroki dogynecologiconcologypatientswithseverelydiminishedrenalfunctionandurinarytractobstructionbenefitfromureteralstentingorpercutaneousnephrostomy
_version_ 1716814123098963968
spelling doaj-2cd6c6e0636948f695534ff5602b8a902020-11-24T20:45:41ZengElsevierGynecologic Oncology Reports2352-57892019-05-0128136140Do gynecologic oncology patients with severely diminished renal function and urinary tract obstruction benefit from ureteral stenting or percutaneous nephrostomy?Brooke Liang0Sara S. Lange1L. Stewart Massad2Rebecca Dick3Kathryn A. Mills4Andrea R. Hagemann5Carolyn K. McCourt6Premal H. Thaker7Katherine C. Fuh8David G. Mutch9Matthew A. Powell10Lindsay M. Kuroki11Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of AmericaDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of AmericaDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of AmericaDivision of Clinical Research, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of AmericaDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of AmericaDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of AmericaDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of AmericaDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of AmericaDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of AmericaDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of AmericaDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of AmericaDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America; Corresponding author at: Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 South Euclid Avenue, Mail Stop 8064-34-905, St. Louis, MO 63110, United States of America.Objective: To assess the renal outcomes of gynecologic oncology patients who present with hydronephrosis and acute kidney injury (AKI), have <20% renal function on diuretic renal scintigraphy, and undergo placement of a ureteral stent or percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN) tube. Methods: This is a single-institution case series of gynecologic oncology patients who underwent diuretic renal scintigraphy from January 1, 2007, to June 1, 2017. Univariate and multivariate logistic analyses were used to assess predictors of <20% renal function. Recovery from AKI or elevated creatinine was reported for women with <20% renal function who received a unilateral ureteral stent or PCN tube on the same side as their more compromised kidney. Results: Among 353 gynecologic oncology patients who underwent diuretic renal scintigraphy, 58 (16%) had renal function <20%. Mean age was 59.6 years, 17% had preexisting chronic kidney disease, and 44% had a diagnosis of cervical cancer. Renal atrophy on computed tomography scan (aOR 18.24, 95% CI 1.21–274.92) predicted renal function <20%. Of 10 women with <20% renal function who received a stent or PCN tube, 7 recovered from AKI or elevated creatinine. Conclusions: Gynecologic oncology patients with <20% renal function may recover from AKI after placement of a stent or PCN tube, indicating that a diuretic renal scintigraphy cutoff of <20% renal function may be overly conservative. Future studies are warranted to determine optimal renal function cutoffs for stent/PCN tube placement in gynecologic oncology patients. Keywords: Urinary tract obstruction, Gynecologic oncology, Diuretic renal scintigraphy, Ureteral stent, Percutaneous nephrostomy tubehttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352578919300463