Additive Manufacturing in the Construction Industry: The Comparative Competitiveness of 3D Concrete Printing

The construction industry is facing increasing pressure to improve productivity and decrease its environmental impact. Additive manufacturing (AM) technologies, especially three-dimensional concrete printing (3DCP) technology, have provided many benefits for construction. However, holistic comparati...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Siavash H. Khajavi, Müge Tetik, Ashish Mohite, Antti Peltokorpi, Mingyang Li, Yiwei Weng, Jan Holmström
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-04-01
Series:Applied Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/9/3865
id doaj-2ccc17dfd5764b06b96d8427becba549
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2ccc17dfd5764b06b96d8427becba5492021-04-24T23:02:58ZengMDPI AGApplied Sciences2076-34172021-04-01113865386510.3390/app11093865Additive Manufacturing in the Construction Industry: The Comparative Competitiveness of 3D Concrete PrintingSiavash H. Khajavi0Müge Tetik1Ashish Mohite2Antti Peltokorpi3Mingyang Li4Yiwei Weng5Jan Holmström6Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, Aalto University, 00076 Aalto, FinlandDepartment of Civil Engineering, Aalto University, 00076 Aalto, FinlandDepartment of Architecture, Aalto University, 00076 Aalto, FinlandDepartment of Civil Engineering, Aalto University, 00076 Aalto, FinlandSingapore Center for 3D printing, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 639798Singapore Center for 3D printing, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 639798Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, Aalto University, 00076 Aalto, FinlandThe construction industry is facing increasing pressure to improve productivity and decrease its environmental impact. Additive manufacturing (AM) technologies, especially three-dimensional concrete printing (3DCP) technology, have provided many benefits for construction. However, holistic comparative studies of the competitiveness of 3DCP and conventional methods, from cost and time perspectives, are lacking. Choosing between the methods is difficult for practitioners. In this study, we investigated the current state of 3DCP in the construction industry using seven distinct scenarios. Our analysis was performed to illustrate the impact of design and supply chain configurations on performance. The results prove the notable competitiveness of 3DCP. In contrast to the conventional construction method, the more complex round design had a positive impact on the cost and process time in 3DCP scenarios. Additionally, we show that on-site 3DCP using a robotic arm was more cost-effective than off-site 3DCP.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/9/38653D concrete printingadditive manufacturingsupply chain configurationsprocess mapping
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Siavash H. Khajavi
Müge Tetik
Ashish Mohite
Antti Peltokorpi
Mingyang Li
Yiwei Weng
Jan Holmström
spellingShingle Siavash H. Khajavi
Müge Tetik
Ashish Mohite
Antti Peltokorpi
Mingyang Li
Yiwei Weng
Jan Holmström
Additive Manufacturing in the Construction Industry: The Comparative Competitiveness of 3D Concrete Printing
Applied Sciences
3D concrete printing
additive manufacturing
supply chain configurations
process mapping
author_facet Siavash H. Khajavi
Müge Tetik
Ashish Mohite
Antti Peltokorpi
Mingyang Li
Yiwei Weng
Jan Holmström
author_sort Siavash H. Khajavi
title Additive Manufacturing in the Construction Industry: The Comparative Competitiveness of 3D Concrete Printing
title_short Additive Manufacturing in the Construction Industry: The Comparative Competitiveness of 3D Concrete Printing
title_full Additive Manufacturing in the Construction Industry: The Comparative Competitiveness of 3D Concrete Printing
title_fullStr Additive Manufacturing in the Construction Industry: The Comparative Competitiveness of 3D Concrete Printing
title_full_unstemmed Additive Manufacturing in the Construction Industry: The Comparative Competitiveness of 3D Concrete Printing
title_sort additive manufacturing in the construction industry: the comparative competitiveness of 3d concrete printing
publisher MDPI AG
series Applied Sciences
issn 2076-3417
publishDate 2021-04-01
description The construction industry is facing increasing pressure to improve productivity and decrease its environmental impact. Additive manufacturing (AM) technologies, especially three-dimensional concrete printing (3DCP) technology, have provided many benefits for construction. However, holistic comparative studies of the competitiveness of 3DCP and conventional methods, from cost and time perspectives, are lacking. Choosing between the methods is difficult for practitioners. In this study, we investigated the current state of 3DCP in the construction industry using seven distinct scenarios. Our analysis was performed to illustrate the impact of design and supply chain configurations on performance. The results prove the notable competitiveness of 3DCP. In contrast to the conventional construction method, the more complex round design had a positive impact on the cost and process time in 3DCP scenarios. Additionally, we show that on-site 3DCP using a robotic arm was more cost-effective than off-site 3DCP.
topic 3D concrete printing
additive manufacturing
supply chain configurations
process mapping
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/9/3865
work_keys_str_mv AT siavashhkhajavi additivemanufacturingintheconstructionindustrythecomparativecompetitivenessof3dconcreteprinting
AT mugetetik additivemanufacturingintheconstructionindustrythecomparativecompetitivenessof3dconcreteprinting
AT ashishmohite additivemanufacturingintheconstructionindustrythecomparativecompetitivenessof3dconcreteprinting
AT anttipeltokorpi additivemanufacturingintheconstructionindustrythecomparativecompetitivenessof3dconcreteprinting
AT mingyangli additivemanufacturingintheconstructionindustrythecomparativecompetitivenessof3dconcreteprinting
AT yiweiweng additivemanufacturingintheconstructionindustrythecomparativecompetitivenessof3dconcreteprinting
AT janholmstrom additivemanufacturingintheconstructionindustrythecomparativecompetitivenessof3dconcreteprinting
_version_ 1721510846744494080