Light use efficiency over two temperate steppes in inner Mongolia, China.

Vegetation light use efficiency (LUE) is a key parameter of Production Efficiency Models (PEMs) for simulating gross primary production (GPP) of vegetation, from regional to global scales. Previous studies suggest that grasslands have the largest inter-site variation of LUE and controlling factors o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yu Wang, Guangsheng Zhou
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2012-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3423395?pdf=render
id doaj-2cc987c33a7c4de9bdca3d6b6fe44c65
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2cc987c33a7c4de9bdca3d6b6fe44c652020-11-24T21:46:28ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032012-01-0178e4361410.1371/journal.pone.0043614Light use efficiency over two temperate steppes in inner Mongolia, China.Yu WangGuangsheng ZhouVegetation light use efficiency (LUE) is a key parameter of Production Efficiency Models (PEMs) for simulating gross primary production (GPP) of vegetation, from regional to global scales. Previous studies suggest that grasslands have the largest inter-site variation of LUE and controlling factors of grassland LUE differ from those of other biomes, since grasslands are usually water-limited ecosystems. Combining eddy covariance flux data with the fraction of photosynthetically active radiation absorbed by the plant canopy from MODIS, we report LUE on a typical steppe and a desert steppe in Inner Mongolia, northern China. Results show that both annual average LUE and maximum LUE were higher on the desert steppe (0.51 and 1.13 g C MJ(-1)) than on the typical steppe (0.34 and 0.88 g C MJ(-1)), despite the higher GPP of the latter. Water availability was the primary limiting factor of LUE at both sites. Evaporative fraction (EF) or the ratio of actual evapotranspiration to potential evapotranspiration (AET/PET) can explain 50-70% of seasonal LUE variations at both sites. However, the slope of linear regression between LUE and EF (or AET/PET) differed significantly between the two sites. LUE increased with the diffuse radiation ratio on the typical steppe; however, such a trend was not found for the desert steppe. Our results suggest that a biome-dependent LUE(max) is inappropriate, because of the large inter-site difference of LUE(max) within the biome. EF could be a promising down-regulator on grassland LUE for PEMs, but there may be a site-specific relationship between LUE and EF.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3423395?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yu Wang
Guangsheng Zhou
spellingShingle Yu Wang
Guangsheng Zhou
Light use efficiency over two temperate steppes in inner Mongolia, China.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Yu Wang
Guangsheng Zhou
author_sort Yu Wang
title Light use efficiency over two temperate steppes in inner Mongolia, China.
title_short Light use efficiency over two temperate steppes in inner Mongolia, China.
title_full Light use efficiency over two temperate steppes in inner Mongolia, China.
title_fullStr Light use efficiency over two temperate steppes in inner Mongolia, China.
title_full_unstemmed Light use efficiency over two temperate steppes in inner Mongolia, China.
title_sort light use efficiency over two temperate steppes in inner mongolia, china.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2012-01-01
description Vegetation light use efficiency (LUE) is a key parameter of Production Efficiency Models (PEMs) for simulating gross primary production (GPP) of vegetation, from regional to global scales. Previous studies suggest that grasslands have the largest inter-site variation of LUE and controlling factors of grassland LUE differ from those of other biomes, since grasslands are usually water-limited ecosystems. Combining eddy covariance flux data with the fraction of photosynthetically active radiation absorbed by the plant canopy from MODIS, we report LUE on a typical steppe and a desert steppe in Inner Mongolia, northern China. Results show that both annual average LUE and maximum LUE were higher on the desert steppe (0.51 and 1.13 g C MJ(-1)) than on the typical steppe (0.34 and 0.88 g C MJ(-1)), despite the higher GPP of the latter. Water availability was the primary limiting factor of LUE at both sites. Evaporative fraction (EF) or the ratio of actual evapotranspiration to potential evapotranspiration (AET/PET) can explain 50-70% of seasonal LUE variations at both sites. However, the slope of linear regression between LUE and EF (or AET/PET) differed significantly between the two sites. LUE increased with the diffuse radiation ratio on the typical steppe; however, such a trend was not found for the desert steppe. Our results suggest that a biome-dependent LUE(max) is inappropriate, because of the large inter-site difference of LUE(max) within the biome. EF could be a promising down-regulator on grassland LUE for PEMs, but there may be a site-specific relationship between LUE and EF.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3423395?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT yuwang lightuseefficiencyovertwotemperatesteppesininnermongoliachina
AT guangshengzhou lightuseefficiencyovertwotemperatesteppesininnermongoliachina
_version_ 1725901976175116288