Why the aortic dissection detection risk score is problematic in emergency departments
Acute aortic syndromes, including aortic dissection (AD), are rare. The AD detection risk score (ADDRS) and associated investigation pathway were developed to reduce missed diagnosis of AD. The methodology for its development was sub-optimal and it has not been robustly validated in the emergency de...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Open Exploration Publishing Inc.
2021-08-01
|
Series: | Exploration of Medicine |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.explorationpub.com/Journals/em/Article/100153 |
id |
doaj-2cc64081912b444184c07f0b3b2acfcd |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-2cc64081912b444184c07f0b3b2acfcd2021-09-01T08:37:00ZengOpen Exploration Publishing Inc.Exploration of Medicine2692-31062021-08-012434835110.37349/emed.2021.00053Why the aortic dissection detection risk score is problematic in emergency departmentsAnne-Maree Kelly0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4655-5023Joseph Epstein Centre for Emergency Medicine Research at Western Health, Melbourne 3021, Australia; Department of Medicine, Western Health, Melbourne 3021, Australia; Melbourne Medical School, the University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3010, AustraliaAcute aortic syndromes, including aortic dissection (AD), are rare. The AD detection risk score (ADDRS) and associated investigation pathway were developed to reduce missed diagnosis of AD. The methodology for its development was sub-optimal and it has not been robustly validated in the emergency department chest pain population. Recent research suggests that it will drive over-investigation and that the risks of missed diagnosis may not be in balance with the risks of the testing strategy. There are serious doubts about whether the score and investigation pathway are fit for purpose.https://www.explorationpub.com/Journals/em/Article/100153risk scoreaortic dissectionclinical decision rule |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Anne-Maree Kelly |
spellingShingle |
Anne-Maree Kelly Why the aortic dissection detection risk score is problematic in emergency departments Exploration of Medicine risk score aortic dissection clinical decision rule |
author_facet |
Anne-Maree Kelly |
author_sort |
Anne-Maree Kelly |
title |
Why the aortic dissection detection risk score is problematic in emergency departments |
title_short |
Why the aortic dissection detection risk score is problematic in emergency departments |
title_full |
Why the aortic dissection detection risk score is problematic in emergency departments |
title_fullStr |
Why the aortic dissection detection risk score is problematic in emergency departments |
title_full_unstemmed |
Why the aortic dissection detection risk score is problematic in emergency departments |
title_sort |
why the aortic dissection detection risk score is problematic in emergency departments |
publisher |
Open Exploration Publishing Inc. |
series |
Exploration of Medicine |
issn |
2692-3106 |
publishDate |
2021-08-01 |
description |
Acute aortic syndromes, including aortic dissection (AD), are rare. The AD detection risk score (ADDRS) and associated investigation pathway were developed to reduce missed diagnosis of AD. The methodology for its development was sub-optimal and it has not been robustly validated in the emergency department chest pain population. Recent research suggests that it will drive over-investigation and that the risks of missed diagnosis may not be in balance with the risks of the testing strategy. There are serious doubts about whether the score and investigation pathway are fit for purpose. |
topic |
risk score aortic dissection clinical decision rule |
url |
https://www.explorationpub.com/Journals/em/Article/100153 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT annemareekelly whytheaorticdissectiondetectionriskscoreisproblematicinemergencydepartments |
_version_ |
1721182859174084608 |