Number Of Clinical Trial Study Sites Impacts Observed Treatment Effect Size: An Analysis Of Randomized Controlled Trials Of Opioids For Chronic Pain

Diana S Meske,1 Ben J Vaughn,2 Ernest A Kopecky,3 Nathaniel Katz4,5 1Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc, Stoughton, MA, USA; 2Rho, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; 3Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc, Frazer, PA, USA; 4WCG Analgesic Solutions, Wayland, MA, USA; 5Department of Anesthesia, Tufts Un...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Meske DS, Vaughn BJ, Kopecky EA, Katz N
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Dove Medical Press 2019-11-01
Series:Journal of Pain Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.dovepress.com/number-of-clinical-trial-study-sites-impacts-observed-treatment-effect-peer-reviewed-article-JPR
id doaj-2cc5557533b341839e7cb2b063e3d011
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2cc5557533b341839e7cb2b063e3d0112020-11-25T02:21:29ZengDove Medical PressJournal of Pain Research1178-70902019-11-01Volume 123161316549913Number Of Clinical Trial Study Sites Impacts Observed Treatment Effect Size: An Analysis Of Randomized Controlled Trials Of Opioids For Chronic PainMeske DSVaughn BJKopecky EAKatz NDiana S Meske,1 Ben J Vaughn,2 Ernest A Kopecky,3 Nathaniel Katz4,5 1Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc, Stoughton, MA, USA; 2Rho, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; 3Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc, Frazer, PA, USA; 4WCG Analgesic Solutions, Wayland, MA, USA; 5Department of Anesthesia, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USACorrespondence: Diana S MeskeCollegium Pharmaceutical, Inc, Stoughton, MA, USATel +1 517 712 3087Email dsmeske@gmail.comBackground: Many aspects of study conduct impact the observed effect size of treatment. Data were utilized from a recently published meta-analysis of randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical trials performed for the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of full mu-agonist opioids for the treatment of chronic pain.Methods: The number of study sites in each clinical trial and standardized effect size (SES) were extracted and computed. Standardized effect size was plotted against number of sites, and a two-piece linear model was fit to the plot. Ten studies were included.Results: The SES decreased linearly by 0.13 units for every 10 sites (p=0.037), from 0.75 to 0.36, until an inflection point of 60 sites, after which SES did not decline further. The total number of subjects required for 90% power to discriminate drug from placebo increased from 78 to 336 subjects going from 30 to 60 sites.Conclusion: Results showed that the number of sites was a source of loss of assay sensitivity in clinical trials, which may contribute to the well-known problem of failure to successfully transition from Phase 2 to Phase 3 clinical development. Potential solutions include minimizing the number of sites, more rigorous and validated training, central statistical monitoring with rapid correction of performance issues, and more rigorous subject and site selection.Keywords: randomized controlled trials, opioids, chronic pain, clinical trials, effect size, study site numberhttps://www.dovepress.com/number-of-clinical-trial-study-sites-impacts-observed-treatment-effect-peer-reviewed-article-JPRrandomized controlled trialsopioidschronic painclinical trialseffect sizestudy site number
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Meske DS
Vaughn BJ
Kopecky EA
Katz N
spellingShingle Meske DS
Vaughn BJ
Kopecky EA
Katz N
Number Of Clinical Trial Study Sites Impacts Observed Treatment Effect Size: An Analysis Of Randomized Controlled Trials Of Opioids For Chronic Pain
Journal of Pain Research
randomized controlled trials
opioids
chronic pain
clinical trials
effect size
study site number
author_facet Meske DS
Vaughn BJ
Kopecky EA
Katz N
author_sort Meske DS
title Number Of Clinical Trial Study Sites Impacts Observed Treatment Effect Size: An Analysis Of Randomized Controlled Trials Of Opioids For Chronic Pain
title_short Number Of Clinical Trial Study Sites Impacts Observed Treatment Effect Size: An Analysis Of Randomized Controlled Trials Of Opioids For Chronic Pain
title_full Number Of Clinical Trial Study Sites Impacts Observed Treatment Effect Size: An Analysis Of Randomized Controlled Trials Of Opioids For Chronic Pain
title_fullStr Number Of Clinical Trial Study Sites Impacts Observed Treatment Effect Size: An Analysis Of Randomized Controlled Trials Of Opioids For Chronic Pain
title_full_unstemmed Number Of Clinical Trial Study Sites Impacts Observed Treatment Effect Size: An Analysis Of Randomized Controlled Trials Of Opioids For Chronic Pain
title_sort number of clinical trial study sites impacts observed treatment effect size: an analysis of randomized controlled trials of opioids for chronic pain
publisher Dove Medical Press
series Journal of Pain Research
issn 1178-7090
publishDate 2019-11-01
description Diana S Meske,1 Ben J Vaughn,2 Ernest A Kopecky,3 Nathaniel Katz4,5 1Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc, Stoughton, MA, USA; 2Rho, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; 3Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc, Frazer, PA, USA; 4WCG Analgesic Solutions, Wayland, MA, USA; 5Department of Anesthesia, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USACorrespondence: Diana S MeskeCollegium Pharmaceutical, Inc, Stoughton, MA, USATel +1 517 712 3087Email dsmeske@gmail.comBackground: Many aspects of study conduct impact the observed effect size of treatment. Data were utilized from a recently published meta-analysis of randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical trials performed for the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of full mu-agonist opioids for the treatment of chronic pain.Methods: The number of study sites in each clinical trial and standardized effect size (SES) were extracted and computed. Standardized effect size was plotted against number of sites, and a two-piece linear model was fit to the plot. Ten studies were included.Results: The SES decreased linearly by 0.13 units for every 10 sites (p=0.037), from 0.75 to 0.36, until an inflection point of 60 sites, after which SES did not decline further. The total number of subjects required for 90% power to discriminate drug from placebo increased from 78 to 336 subjects going from 30 to 60 sites.Conclusion: Results showed that the number of sites was a source of loss of assay sensitivity in clinical trials, which may contribute to the well-known problem of failure to successfully transition from Phase 2 to Phase 3 clinical development. Potential solutions include minimizing the number of sites, more rigorous and validated training, central statistical monitoring with rapid correction of performance issues, and more rigorous subject and site selection.Keywords: randomized controlled trials, opioids, chronic pain, clinical trials, effect size, study site number
topic randomized controlled trials
opioids
chronic pain
clinical trials
effect size
study site number
url https://www.dovepress.com/number-of-clinical-trial-study-sites-impacts-observed-treatment-effect-peer-reviewed-article-JPR
work_keys_str_mv AT meskeds numberofclinicaltrialstudysitesimpactsobservedtreatmenteffectsizeananalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsofopioidsforchronicpain
AT vaughnbj numberofclinicaltrialstudysitesimpactsobservedtreatmenteffectsizeananalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsofopioidsforchronicpain
AT kopeckyea numberofclinicaltrialstudysitesimpactsobservedtreatmenteffectsizeananalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsofopioidsforchronicpain
AT katzn numberofclinicaltrialstudysitesimpactsobservedtreatmenteffectsizeananalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsofopioidsforchronicpain
_version_ 1724865820067102720