Worldwide Regulatory Guidance Values Applied to Direct Contact Surface Soil Pesticide Contamination: Part I—Carcinogenic Pesticides

Regulatory agencies worldwide have developed regulatory guidance values (RGVs) for nearly 800 pesticides. Analysis of the residential surface soil guidance values applied to the most frequently regulated current-use agriculture, home, and garden pesticides is presented. Part I concentrates on values...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Aaron A Jennings, Zijian Li
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2017-06-01
Series:Air, Soil and Water Research
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/1178622117711930
id doaj-2ca9c2e8fad9464f88065044a78602a4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2ca9c2e8fad9464f88065044a78602a42020-11-25T03:17:11ZengSAGE PublishingAir, Soil and Water Research1178-62212017-06-011010.1177/1178622117711930Worldwide Regulatory Guidance Values Applied to Direct Contact Surface Soil Pesticide Contamination: Part I—Carcinogenic PesticidesAaron A JenningsZijian LiRegulatory agencies worldwide have developed regulatory guidance values (RGVs) for nearly 800 pesticides. Analysis of the residential surface soil guidance values applied to the most frequently regulated current-use agriculture, home, and garden pesticides is presented. Part I concentrates on values applied to atrazine, simazine, and trifluralin. These are unique among commonly used pesticides because they are generally considered to be human carcinogens. Their use has been banned in much of the world, but they are commonly used in the United States. Regulatory guidance values applied to these 3 pesticides vary by 8.6, 5.5, and 5.1 orders of magnitude. Risk model coefficient–bounded set uncertainty analysis is applied to help analyze this variability. Cancer risk model uncertainty bounds appear to contain 36.3%, 43.0%, and 49.5% of the RGVs. Most of the remaining values appear to exceed a lifetime cancer incidence risk of 1 × 10 −6 and may not be adequately protective of human health.https://doi.org/10.1177/1178622117711930
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Aaron A Jennings
Zijian Li
spellingShingle Aaron A Jennings
Zijian Li
Worldwide Regulatory Guidance Values Applied to Direct Contact Surface Soil Pesticide Contamination: Part I—Carcinogenic Pesticides
Air, Soil and Water Research
author_facet Aaron A Jennings
Zijian Li
author_sort Aaron A Jennings
title Worldwide Regulatory Guidance Values Applied to Direct Contact Surface Soil Pesticide Contamination: Part I—Carcinogenic Pesticides
title_short Worldwide Regulatory Guidance Values Applied to Direct Contact Surface Soil Pesticide Contamination: Part I—Carcinogenic Pesticides
title_full Worldwide Regulatory Guidance Values Applied to Direct Contact Surface Soil Pesticide Contamination: Part I—Carcinogenic Pesticides
title_fullStr Worldwide Regulatory Guidance Values Applied to Direct Contact Surface Soil Pesticide Contamination: Part I—Carcinogenic Pesticides
title_full_unstemmed Worldwide Regulatory Guidance Values Applied to Direct Contact Surface Soil Pesticide Contamination: Part I—Carcinogenic Pesticides
title_sort worldwide regulatory guidance values applied to direct contact surface soil pesticide contamination: part i—carcinogenic pesticides
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Air, Soil and Water Research
issn 1178-6221
publishDate 2017-06-01
description Regulatory agencies worldwide have developed regulatory guidance values (RGVs) for nearly 800 pesticides. Analysis of the residential surface soil guidance values applied to the most frequently regulated current-use agriculture, home, and garden pesticides is presented. Part I concentrates on values applied to atrazine, simazine, and trifluralin. These are unique among commonly used pesticides because they are generally considered to be human carcinogens. Their use has been banned in much of the world, but they are commonly used in the United States. Regulatory guidance values applied to these 3 pesticides vary by 8.6, 5.5, and 5.1 orders of magnitude. Risk model coefficient–bounded set uncertainty analysis is applied to help analyze this variability. Cancer risk model uncertainty bounds appear to contain 36.3%, 43.0%, and 49.5% of the RGVs. Most of the remaining values appear to exceed a lifetime cancer incidence risk of 1 × 10 −6 and may not be adequately protective of human health.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/1178622117711930
work_keys_str_mv AT aaronajennings worldwideregulatoryguidancevaluesappliedtodirectcontactsurfacesoilpesticidecontaminationparticarcinogenicpesticides
AT zijianli worldwideregulatoryguidancevaluesappliedtodirectcontactsurfacesoilpesticidecontaminationparticarcinogenicpesticides
_version_ 1724632959174049792