Defining key design elements of registry-based randomised controlled trials: a scoping review
Abstract Background Traditional randomised controlled trials remain the gold standard for improving clinical care but they do have their limitations, including their associated high costs, high failure rate and limited external validity. An alternative methodology is the newly defined, prospective,...
Main Authors: | Bill Karanatsios, Khic-Houy Prang, Ebony Verbunt, Justin M. Yeung, Margaret Kelaher, Peter Gibbs |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2020-06-01
|
Series: | Trials |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13063-020-04459-z |
Similar Items
-
Clinical trials in dentistry in India: Analysis from trial registry
by: S Gowri, et al.
Published: (2017-01-01) -
Commentary: On the levels of patient selection in registry-based randomized controlled trials
by: Florian Lasch, et al.
Published: (2019-02-01) -
Enhancing Value and Uptake for Whole-Population Cohorts of Children and Parents: Methods to Integrate Registries into the Generation Victoria Cohort
by: Valerie Sung, et al.
Published: (2021-04-01) -
Open-access clinical trial registries: the Italian scenario
by: Mosconi Paola, et al.
Published: (2012-10-01) -
Feasibility of randomizing Danish citizens aged 65–79 years to high-dose quadrivalent influenza vaccine vs. standard-dose quadrivalent influenza vaccine in a pragmatic registry-based setting: rationale and design of the DANFLU-1 Trial
by: Biering-Sørensen, T., et al.
Published: (2022)