Applying the WHO ICF Framework to the Outcome Measures Used in the Evaluation of Long-Term Clinical Outcomes in Coronavirus Outbreaks
(1) Objective: The World Health Organization’s (WHO) International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) classification is a unified framework for the description of health and health-related states. This study aimed to use the ICF framework to classify outcome measures used in...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2020-09-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/18/6476 |
id |
doaj-2c9b45f246614ce396110f3f022a5403 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-2c9b45f246614ce396110f3f022a54032020-11-25T02:43:12ZengMDPI AGInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health1661-78271660-46012020-09-01176476647610.3390/ijerph17186476Applying the WHO ICF Framework to the Outcome Measures Used in the Evaluation of Long-Term Clinical Outcomes in Coronavirus OutbreaksKajal Patel0Sofia Straudi1Ng Yee Sien2Nora Fayed3John L. Melvin4Manoj Sivan5School of Medicine, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PG, UKNeuroscience and Rehabilitation Department, Ferrara University Hospital, 44100 Ferrara, ItalyDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Road, Singapore 169608, SingaporeSchool of Rehabilitation Therapy, Queen’s University, Louise D. Acton Building, 31 George Street, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, CanadaDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19144, USADivision of Neurosciences and Experimental Psychology, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK(1) Objective: The World Health Organization’s (WHO) International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) classification is a unified framework for the description of health and health-related states. This study aimed to use the ICF framework to classify outcome measures used in follow-up studies of coronavirus outbreaks and make recommendations for future studies. (2) Methods: EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL and PsycINFO were systematically searched for original studies assessing clinical outcomes in adult survivors of severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (SARS), middle east respiratory syndrome (MERS) and coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) after hospital discharge. Individual items of the identified outcome measures were linked to ICF second-level and third-level categories using ICF linking rules and categorized according to an ICF component. (3) Results: In total, 33 outcome measures were identified from 36 studies. Commonly used (a) ICF body function measures were Pulmonary Function Tests (PFT), Impact of event scale (IES-R) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS); (b) ICF activity was 6-Minute Walking Distance (6MWD); (c) ICF participation measures included Short Form-36 (SF-36) and St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ). ICF environmental factors and personal factors were rarely measured. (4) Conclusions: We recommend future COVID-19 follow-up studies to use the ICF framework to select a combination of outcome measures that capture all the components for a better understanding of the impact on survivors and planning interventions to maximize functional return.https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/18/6476COVID-19SARSMERSoutcome measuresfollow-up studiesprevalence |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Kajal Patel Sofia Straudi Ng Yee Sien Nora Fayed John L. Melvin Manoj Sivan |
spellingShingle |
Kajal Patel Sofia Straudi Ng Yee Sien Nora Fayed John L. Melvin Manoj Sivan Applying the WHO ICF Framework to the Outcome Measures Used in the Evaluation of Long-Term Clinical Outcomes in Coronavirus Outbreaks International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health COVID-19 SARS MERS outcome measures follow-up studies prevalence |
author_facet |
Kajal Patel Sofia Straudi Ng Yee Sien Nora Fayed John L. Melvin Manoj Sivan |
author_sort |
Kajal Patel |
title |
Applying the WHO ICF Framework to the Outcome Measures Used in the Evaluation of Long-Term Clinical Outcomes in Coronavirus Outbreaks |
title_short |
Applying the WHO ICF Framework to the Outcome Measures Used in the Evaluation of Long-Term Clinical Outcomes in Coronavirus Outbreaks |
title_full |
Applying the WHO ICF Framework to the Outcome Measures Used in the Evaluation of Long-Term Clinical Outcomes in Coronavirus Outbreaks |
title_fullStr |
Applying the WHO ICF Framework to the Outcome Measures Used in the Evaluation of Long-Term Clinical Outcomes in Coronavirus Outbreaks |
title_full_unstemmed |
Applying the WHO ICF Framework to the Outcome Measures Used in the Evaluation of Long-Term Clinical Outcomes in Coronavirus Outbreaks |
title_sort |
applying the who icf framework to the outcome measures used in the evaluation of long-term clinical outcomes in coronavirus outbreaks |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health |
issn |
1661-7827 1660-4601 |
publishDate |
2020-09-01 |
description |
(1) Objective: The World Health Organization’s (WHO) International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) classification is a unified framework for the description of health and health-related states. This study aimed to use the ICF framework to classify outcome measures used in follow-up studies of coronavirus outbreaks and make recommendations for future studies. (2) Methods: EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL and PsycINFO were systematically searched for original studies assessing clinical outcomes in adult survivors of severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (SARS), middle east respiratory syndrome (MERS) and coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) after hospital discharge. Individual items of the identified outcome measures were linked to ICF second-level and third-level categories using ICF linking rules and categorized according to an ICF component. (3) Results: In total, 33 outcome measures were identified from 36 studies. Commonly used (a) ICF body function measures were Pulmonary Function Tests (PFT), Impact of event scale (IES-R) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS); (b) ICF activity was 6-Minute Walking Distance (6MWD); (c) ICF participation measures included Short Form-36 (SF-36) and St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ). ICF environmental factors and personal factors were rarely measured. (4) Conclusions: We recommend future COVID-19 follow-up studies to use the ICF framework to select a combination of outcome measures that capture all the components for a better understanding of the impact on survivors and planning interventions to maximize functional return. |
topic |
COVID-19 SARS MERS outcome measures follow-up studies prevalence |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/18/6476 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT kajalpatel applyingthewhoicfframeworktotheoutcomemeasuresusedintheevaluationoflongtermclinicaloutcomesincoronavirusoutbreaks AT sofiastraudi applyingthewhoicfframeworktotheoutcomemeasuresusedintheevaluationoflongtermclinicaloutcomesincoronavirusoutbreaks AT ngyeesien applyingthewhoicfframeworktotheoutcomemeasuresusedintheevaluationoflongtermclinicaloutcomesincoronavirusoutbreaks AT norafayed applyingthewhoicfframeworktotheoutcomemeasuresusedintheevaluationoflongtermclinicaloutcomesincoronavirusoutbreaks AT johnlmelvin applyingthewhoicfframeworktotheoutcomemeasuresusedintheevaluationoflongtermclinicaloutcomesincoronavirusoutbreaks AT manojsivan applyingthewhoicfframeworktotheoutcomemeasuresusedintheevaluationoflongtermclinicaloutcomesincoronavirusoutbreaks |
_version_ |
1724770825835380736 |