Applying the WHO ICF Framework to the Outcome Measures Used in the Evaluation of Long-Term Clinical Outcomes in Coronavirus Outbreaks

(1) Objective: The World Health Organization’s (WHO) International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) classification is a unified framework for the description of health and health-related states. This study aimed to use the ICF framework to classify outcome measures used in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kajal Patel, Sofia Straudi, Ng Yee Sien, Nora Fayed, John L. Melvin, Manoj Sivan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-09-01
Series:International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/18/6476
id doaj-2c9b45f246614ce396110f3f022a5403
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2c9b45f246614ce396110f3f022a54032020-11-25T02:43:12ZengMDPI AGInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health1661-78271660-46012020-09-01176476647610.3390/ijerph17186476Applying the WHO ICF Framework to the Outcome Measures Used in the Evaluation of Long-Term Clinical Outcomes in Coronavirus OutbreaksKajal Patel0Sofia Straudi1Ng Yee Sien2Nora Fayed3John L. Melvin4Manoj Sivan5School of Medicine, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PG, UKNeuroscience and Rehabilitation Department, Ferrara University Hospital, 44100 Ferrara, ItalyDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Road, Singapore 169608, SingaporeSchool of Rehabilitation Therapy, Queen’s University, Louise D. Acton Building, 31 George Street, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, CanadaDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19144, USADivision of Neurosciences and Experimental Psychology, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK(1) Objective: The World Health Organization’s (WHO) International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) classification is a unified framework for the description of health and health-related states. This study aimed to use the ICF framework to classify outcome measures used in follow-up studies of coronavirus outbreaks and make recommendations for future studies. (2) Methods: EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL and PsycINFO were systematically searched for original studies assessing clinical outcomes in adult survivors of severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (SARS), middle east respiratory syndrome (MERS) and coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) after hospital discharge. Individual items of the identified outcome measures were linked to ICF second-level and third-level categories using ICF linking rules and categorized according to an ICF component. (3) Results: In total, 33 outcome measures were identified from 36 studies. Commonly used (a) ICF body function measures were Pulmonary Function Tests (PFT), Impact of event scale (IES-R) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS); (b) ICF activity was 6-Minute Walking Distance (6MWD); (c) ICF participation measures included Short Form-36 (SF-36) and St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ). ICF environmental factors and personal factors were rarely measured. (4) Conclusions: We recommend future COVID-19 follow-up studies to use the ICF framework to select a combination of outcome measures that capture all the components for a better understanding of the impact on survivors and planning interventions to maximize functional return.https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/18/6476COVID-19SARSMERSoutcome measuresfollow-up studiesprevalence
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kajal Patel
Sofia Straudi
Ng Yee Sien
Nora Fayed
John L. Melvin
Manoj Sivan
spellingShingle Kajal Patel
Sofia Straudi
Ng Yee Sien
Nora Fayed
John L. Melvin
Manoj Sivan
Applying the WHO ICF Framework to the Outcome Measures Used in the Evaluation of Long-Term Clinical Outcomes in Coronavirus Outbreaks
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
COVID-19
SARS
MERS
outcome measures
follow-up studies
prevalence
author_facet Kajal Patel
Sofia Straudi
Ng Yee Sien
Nora Fayed
John L. Melvin
Manoj Sivan
author_sort Kajal Patel
title Applying the WHO ICF Framework to the Outcome Measures Used in the Evaluation of Long-Term Clinical Outcomes in Coronavirus Outbreaks
title_short Applying the WHO ICF Framework to the Outcome Measures Used in the Evaluation of Long-Term Clinical Outcomes in Coronavirus Outbreaks
title_full Applying the WHO ICF Framework to the Outcome Measures Used in the Evaluation of Long-Term Clinical Outcomes in Coronavirus Outbreaks
title_fullStr Applying the WHO ICF Framework to the Outcome Measures Used in the Evaluation of Long-Term Clinical Outcomes in Coronavirus Outbreaks
title_full_unstemmed Applying the WHO ICF Framework to the Outcome Measures Used in the Evaluation of Long-Term Clinical Outcomes in Coronavirus Outbreaks
title_sort applying the who icf framework to the outcome measures used in the evaluation of long-term clinical outcomes in coronavirus outbreaks
publisher MDPI AG
series International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
issn 1661-7827
1660-4601
publishDate 2020-09-01
description (1) Objective: The World Health Organization’s (WHO) International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) classification is a unified framework for the description of health and health-related states. This study aimed to use the ICF framework to classify outcome measures used in follow-up studies of coronavirus outbreaks and make recommendations for future studies. (2) Methods: EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL and PsycINFO were systematically searched for original studies assessing clinical outcomes in adult survivors of severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (SARS), middle east respiratory syndrome (MERS) and coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) after hospital discharge. Individual items of the identified outcome measures were linked to ICF second-level and third-level categories using ICF linking rules and categorized according to an ICF component. (3) Results: In total, 33 outcome measures were identified from 36 studies. Commonly used (a) ICF body function measures were Pulmonary Function Tests (PFT), Impact of event scale (IES-R) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS); (b) ICF activity was 6-Minute Walking Distance (6MWD); (c) ICF participation measures included Short Form-36 (SF-36) and St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ). ICF environmental factors and personal factors were rarely measured. (4) Conclusions: We recommend future COVID-19 follow-up studies to use the ICF framework to select a combination of outcome measures that capture all the components for a better understanding of the impact on survivors and planning interventions to maximize functional return.
topic COVID-19
SARS
MERS
outcome measures
follow-up studies
prevalence
url https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/18/6476
work_keys_str_mv AT kajalpatel applyingthewhoicfframeworktotheoutcomemeasuresusedintheevaluationoflongtermclinicaloutcomesincoronavirusoutbreaks
AT sofiastraudi applyingthewhoicfframeworktotheoutcomemeasuresusedintheevaluationoflongtermclinicaloutcomesincoronavirusoutbreaks
AT ngyeesien applyingthewhoicfframeworktotheoutcomemeasuresusedintheevaluationoflongtermclinicaloutcomesincoronavirusoutbreaks
AT norafayed applyingthewhoicfframeworktotheoutcomemeasuresusedintheevaluationoflongtermclinicaloutcomesincoronavirusoutbreaks
AT johnlmelvin applyingthewhoicfframeworktotheoutcomemeasuresusedintheevaluationoflongtermclinicaloutcomesincoronavirusoutbreaks
AT manojsivan applyingthewhoicfframeworktotheoutcomemeasuresusedintheevaluationoflongtermclinicaloutcomesincoronavirusoutbreaks
_version_ 1724770825835380736