Shadowing and Scaffolding Techniques Affecting L2 Reading Comprehension

Scaffolding and shadowing techniques have been shown to improve language learners’ reading comprehension. However, little attention has been paid to the comparative effectiveness of these techniques. This study investigated the effect of three selected scaffolding techniques (peer scaffolding, distr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Abbas Ali Zarei, Hossein Alipour
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Isfahan 2020-01-01
Series:Applied Research on English Language
Subjects:
Online Access:http://are.ui.ac.ir/article_23960_563e3552eea86c05a6580122fddf54f2.pdf
id doaj-2c81fd79d3654a6caca71f3e4feb4a54
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2c81fd79d3654a6caca71f3e4feb4a542020-11-25T03:30:29ZengUniversity of IsfahanApplied Research on English Language2252-01982322-53432020-01-0191537410.22108/are.2019.117030.146223960Shadowing and Scaffolding Techniques Affecting L2 Reading ComprehensionAbbas Ali Zarei0Hossein Alipour1Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, IranImam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, IranScaffolding and shadowing techniques have been shown to improve language learners’ reading comprehension. However, little attention has been paid to the comparative effectiveness of these techniques. This study investigated the effect of three selected scaffolding techniques (peer scaffolding, distributed scaffolding, and reciprocal scaffolding) versus three types of shadowing (complete shadowing, partial shadowing, and interactive shadowing) on L2 reading comprehension. To this end, 120 intermediate level EFL learners (in 6 groups of 20 members each) were selected through convenience sampling from three language institutes in Qazvin. Each group was randomly assigned to one of the shadowing and scaffolding techniques. One way ANOVA and independent samples t-tests were used to analyze the data. The results indicated that among the three scaffolding techniques, distributed scaffolding was the most effective technique on reading comprehension. The most effective technique among shadowing groups was interactive shadowing. A significant difference was also found between the shadowing and scaffolding techniques in favor of scaffolding techniques. These findings may have theoretical and pedagogical implications for researchers, learners, teachers, and syllabus designers.http://are.ui.ac.ir/article_23960_563e3552eea86c05a6580122fddf54f2.pdfreading comprehensionscaffoldingshadowing
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Abbas Ali Zarei
Hossein Alipour
spellingShingle Abbas Ali Zarei
Hossein Alipour
Shadowing and Scaffolding Techniques Affecting L2 Reading Comprehension
Applied Research on English Language
reading comprehension
scaffolding
shadowing
author_facet Abbas Ali Zarei
Hossein Alipour
author_sort Abbas Ali Zarei
title Shadowing and Scaffolding Techniques Affecting L2 Reading Comprehension
title_short Shadowing and Scaffolding Techniques Affecting L2 Reading Comprehension
title_full Shadowing and Scaffolding Techniques Affecting L2 Reading Comprehension
title_fullStr Shadowing and Scaffolding Techniques Affecting L2 Reading Comprehension
title_full_unstemmed Shadowing and Scaffolding Techniques Affecting L2 Reading Comprehension
title_sort shadowing and scaffolding techniques affecting l2 reading comprehension
publisher University of Isfahan
series Applied Research on English Language
issn 2252-0198
2322-5343
publishDate 2020-01-01
description Scaffolding and shadowing techniques have been shown to improve language learners’ reading comprehension. However, little attention has been paid to the comparative effectiveness of these techniques. This study investigated the effect of three selected scaffolding techniques (peer scaffolding, distributed scaffolding, and reciprocal scaffolding) versus three types of shadowing (complete shadowing, partial shadowing, and interactive shadowing) on L2 reading comprehension. To this end, 120 intermediate level EFL learners (in 6 groups of 20 members each) were selected through convenience sampling from three language institutes in Qazvin. Each group was randomly assigned to one of the shadowing and scaffolding techniques. One way ANOVA and independent samples t-tests were used to analyze the data. The results indicated that among the three scaffolding techniques, distributed scaffolding was the most effective technique on reading comprehension. The most effective technique among shadowing groups was interactive shadowing. A significant difference was also found between the shadowing and scaffolding techniques in favor of scaffolding techniques. These findings may have theoretical and pedagogical implications for researchers, learners, teachers, and syllabus designers.
topic reading comprehension
scaffolding
shadowing
url http://are.ui.ac.ir/article_23960_563e3552eea86c05a6580122fddf54f2.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT abbasalizarei shadowingandscaffoldingtechniquesaffectingl2readingcomprehension
AT hosseinalipour shadowingandscaffoldingtechniquesaffectingl2readingcomprehension
_version_ 1724575352327503872