The New 'Knowledge Speak': the implications of contested definitions of knowledge and information

This paper presents a critique of notions of information and knowledge found in the management literature and amongst proponents of 'knowledge management' (Davenport and Prusak 2000) interviewed in the course of a study of changing operations of the Federal Government of Canada vis a vis t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Rob Shields
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Australasian Association for Information Systems 2001-05-01
Series:Australasian Journal of Information Systems
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.acs.org.au/index.php/ajis/article/view/250
id doaj-2c5ba34198d74a30a68b5013a4ff9764
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2c5ba34198d74a30a68b5013a4ff97642021-08-02T09:09:23ZengAustralasian Association for Information SystemsAustralasian Journal of Information Systems1449-86181449-86182001-05-018210.3127/ajis.v8i2.250211The New 'Knowledge Speak': the implications of contested definitions of knowledge and informationRob ShieldsThis paper presents a critique of notions of information and knowledge found in the management literature and amongst proponents of 'knowledge management' (Davenport and Prusak 2000) interviewed in the course of a study of changing operations of the Federal Government of Canada vis a vis the 'knowledge-based economy' as it is found in Canada (Shields, Taborsky, Jones, and O'Hara 2000). Interviews with a range of Federal Government Departments and Agencies on a number of topics including knowledge management were conducted throughout the Summer of 2000. During these interviews a number of competing definitions and numerous misunderstandings of the relationship between knowledge and information emerged. We will distinguish and contrast these with definitions derived from semiotic and information science frameworks. We argue for the importance of the collective and processual nature of knowledge. Our conclusions allow us to specify the shortcomings of existing knowledge management approaches and to identify a necessary and specific focus for future knowledge initiatives in organizations.http://journal.acs.org.au/index.php/ajis/article/view/250knowledge managementCanada
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Rob Shields
spellingShingle Rob Shields
The New 'Knowledge Speak': the implications of contested definitions of knowledge and information
Australasian Journal of Information Systems
knowledge management
Canada
author_facet Rob Shields
author_sort Rob Shields
title The New 'Knowledge Speak': the implications of contested definitions of knowledge and information
title_short The New 'Knowledge Speak': the implications of contested definitions of knowledge and information
title_full The New 'Knowledge Speak': the implications of contested definitions of knowledge and information
title_fullStr The New 'Knowledge Speak': the implications of contested definitions of knowledge and information
title_full_unstemmed The New 'Knowledge Speak': the implications of contested definitions of knowledge and information
title_sort new 'knowledge speak': the implications of contested definitions of knowledge and information
publisher Australasian Association for Information Systems
series Australasian Journal of Information Systems
issn 1449-8618
1449-8618
publishDate 2001-05-01
description This paper presents a critique of notions of information and knowledge found in the management literature and amongst proponents of 'knowledge management' (Davenport and Prusak 2000) interviewed in the course of a study of changing operations of the Federal Government of Canada vis a vis the 'knowledge-based economy' as it is found in Canada (Shields, Taborsky, Jones, and O'Hara 2000). Interviews with a range of Federal Government Departments and Agencies on a number of topics including knowledge management were conducted throughout the Summer of 2000. During these interviews a number of competing definitions and numerous misunderstandings of the relationship between knowledge and information emerged. We will distinguish and contrast these with definitions derived from semiotic and information science frameworks. We argue for the importance of the collective and processual nature of knowledge. Our conclusions allow us to specify the shortcomings of existing knowledge management approaches and to identify a necessary and specific focus for future knowledge initiatives in organizations.
topic knowledge management
Canada
url http://journal.acs.org.au/index.php/ajis/article/view/250
work_keys_str_mv AT robshields thenewknowledgespeaktheimplicationsofcontesteddefinitionsofknowledgeandinformation
AT robshields newknowledgespeaktheimplicationsofcontesteddefinitionsofknowledgeandinformation
_version_ 1721235499714084864