A structural equation model of conflict-affected youth coping and resilience

This study tested a theoretical relationship between trauma exposure, youth coping strategies and peer, family and community level factors on psychological distress and well-being among 399 trauma-affected youth in the Democratic Republic of Congo. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to anal...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Megan Cherewick, Wietse Tol, Gilbert Burnham, Shannon Doocy, Nancy Glass
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2016-01-01
Series:Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21642850.2016.1228458
id doaj-2c5b3beca77044cf9523a616094cf59d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2c5b3beca77044cf9523a616094cf59d2020-11-25T00:14:40ZengTaylor & Francis GroupHealth Psychology and Behavioral Medicine2164-28502016-01-014115517410.1080/21642850.2016.12284581228458A structural equation model of conflict-affected youth coping and resilienceMegan Cherewick0Wietse Tol1Gilbert Burnham2Shannon Doocy3Nancy Glass4Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public HealthJohns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public HealthJohns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public HealthJohns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public HealthJohns Hopkins University School of NursingThis study tested a theoretical relationship between trauma exposure, youth coping strategies and peer, family and community level factors on psychological distress and well-being among 399 trauma-affected youth in the Democratic Republic of Congo. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to analyze paths and to assess differences in relationships by gender. Psychological distress was measured by self-reports of internalizing problems (depression and anxiety), externalizing problems (aggression and behavioral problems) and somatic complaints (pain without medical cause). Self-reports of happiness, hope and self-esteem were measures of well-being. Findings from this study suggest gender differences in how individual coping strategies and external factors explain mental health resilience in trauma-affected youth. Problem-focused coping strategies were associated with higher psychological distress in both boys and girls. Use of avoidance was associated with better well-being in girls and boys and use of faith-based coping strategies was associated with better well-being in boys. Use of both problem-focused and emotion-focused coping strategies (coping flexibility) resulted in lower psychological distress in boys and girls. The home environment including closeness to family, caregiver post traumatic stress disorder and violence in the home was associated with psychological distress and well-being. Having close peer relationships, village safety and enrollment in school benefited well-being. Results from these SEM of resilience suggest that interventions should (1) work to build the coping repertoire of youth, (2) support reduction in psychological distress through improved family relationships and caregiver mental health and (3) target improved well-being through support of positive peer and community relationships and school enrollment.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21642850.2016.1228458Conflictcopingmental healthyouthresilience
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Megan Cherewick
Wietse Tol
Gilbert Burnham
Shannon Doocy
Nancy Glass
spellingShingle Megan Cherewick
Wietse Tol
Gilbert Burnham
Shannon Doocy
Nancy Glass
A structural equation model of conflict-affected youth coping and resilience
Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine
Conflict
coping
mental health
youth
resilience
author_facet Megan Cherewick
Wietse Tol
Gilbert Burnham
Shannon Doocy
Nancy Glass
author_sort Megan Cherewick
title A structural equation model of conflict-affected youth coping and resilience
title_short A structural equation model of conflict-affected youth coping and resilience
title_full A structural equation model of conflict-affected youth coping and resilience
title_fullStr A structural equation model of conflict-affected youth coping and resilience
title_full_unstemmed A structural equation model of conflict-affected youth coping and resilience
title_sort structural equation model of conflict-affected youth coping and resilience
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
series Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine
issn 2164-2850
publishDate 2016-01-01
description This study tested a theoretical relationship between trauma exposure, youth coping strategies and peer, family and community level factors on psychological distress and well-being among 399 trauma-affected youth in the Democratic Republic of Congo. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to analyze paths and to assess differences in relationships by gender. Psychological distress was measured by self-reports of internalizing problems (depression and anxiety), externalizing problems (aggression and behavioral problems) and somatic complaints (pain without medical cause). Self-reports of happiness, hope and self-esteem were measures of well-being. Findings from this study suggest gender differences in how individual coping strategies and external factors explain mental health resilience in trauma-affected youth. Problem-focused coping strategies were associated with higher psychological distress in both boys and girls. Use of avoidance was associated with better well-being in girls and boys and use of faith-based coping strategies was associated with better well-being in boys. Use of both problem-focused and emotion-focused coping strategies (coping flexibility) resulted in lower psychological distress in boys and girls. The home environment including closeness to family, caregiver post traumatic stress disorder and violence in the home was associated with psychological distress and well-being. Having close peer relationships, village safety and enrollment in school benefited well-being. Results from these SEM of resilience suggest that interventions should (1) work to build the coping repertoire of youth, (2) support reduction in psychological distress through improved family relationships and caregiver mental health and (3) target improved well-being through support of positive peer and community relationships and school enrollment.
topic Conflict
coping
mental health
youth
resilience
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21642850.2016.1228458
work_keys_str_mv AT megancherewick astructuralequationmodelofconflictaffectedyouthcopingandresilience
AT wietsetol astructuralequationmodelofconflictaffectedyouthcopingandresilience
AT gilbertburnham astructuralequationmodelofconflictaffectedyouthcopingandresilience
AT shannondoocy astructuralequationmodelofconflictaffectedyouthcopingandresilience
AT nancyglass astructuralequationmodelofconflictaffectedyouthcopingandresilience
AT megancherewick structuralequationmodelofconflictaffectedyouthcopingandresilience
AT wietsetol structuralequationmodelofconflictaffectedyouthcopingandresilience
AT gilbertburnham structuralequationmodelofconflictaffectedyouthcopingandresilience
AT shannondoocy structuralequationmodelofconflictaffectedyouthcopingandresilience
AT nancyglass structuralequationmodelofconflictaffectedyouthcopingandresilience
_version_ 1725389276037775360