Biological in-vivo measurement of dose distribution in patients' lymphocytes by gamma-H2AX immunofluorescence staining: 3D conformal- vs. step-and-shoot IMRT of the prostate gland
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Different radiation-techniques in treating local staged prostate cancer differ in their dose- distribution. Physical phantom measurements indicate that for 3D, less healthy tissue is exposed to a relatively higher dose compared to SS...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2011-06-01
|
Series: | Radiation Oncology |
Online Access: | http://www.ro-journal.com/content/6/1/62 |
id |
doaj-2c266700f7f94e49984527d5a261c2db |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-2c266700f7f94e49984527d5a261c2db2020-11-25T00:43:23ZengBMCRadiation Oncology1748-717X2011-06-01616210.1186/1748-717X-6-62Biological in-vivo measurement of dose distribution in patients' lymphocytes by gamma-H2AX immunofluorescence staining: 3D conformal- vs. step-and-shoot IMRT of the prostate glandHuber Peter EWeber Klaus-JosefMajor GeraldSterzing FlorianSwartman BenedictZwicker FelixThieke ChristianDebus JürgenHerfarth Klaus<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Different radiation-techniques in treating local staged prostate cancer differ in their dose- distribution. Physical phantom measurements indicate that for 3D, less healthy tissue is exposed to a relatively higher dose compared to SSIMRT. The purpose is to substantiate a dose distribution in lymphocytes <it>in-vivo </it>and to discuss the possibility of comparing it to the physical model of total body dose distribution.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>For each technique (3D and SSIMRT), blood was taken from 20 patients before and 10 min after their first fraction of radiotherapy. The isolated leukocytes were fixed 2 hours after radiation. DNA double-strand breaks (DSB) in lymphocytes' nuclei were stained immunocytochemically using the gamma-H2AX protein. Gamma-H2AX foci inside each nucleus were counted in 300 irradiated as well as 50 non-irradiated lymphocytes per patient. In addition, lymphocytes of 5 volunteer subjects were irradiated externally at different doses and processed under same conditions as the patients' lymphocytes in order to generate a calibration-line. This calibration-line assigns dose-value to mean number of gamma-H2AX foci/ nucleus. So the dose distributions in patients' lymphocytes were determined regarding to the gamma-H2AX foci distribution. With this information a cumulative dose-lymphocyte-histogram (DLH) was generated. Visualized distribution of gamma-H2AX foci, correspondingly dose per nucleus, was compared to the technical dose-volume-histogram (DVH), related to the whole body-volume.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Measured <it>in-vivo </it>(DLH) and according to the physical treatment-planning (DVH), more lymphocytes resulted with low-dose exposure (< 20% of the applied dose) and significantly fewer lymphocytes with middle-dose exposure (30%-60%) during Step-and-Shoot-IMRT, compared to conventional 3D conformal radiotherapy. The high-dose exposure (> 80%) was equal in both radiation techniques. The mean number of gamma-H2AX foci per lymphocyte was 0.49 (3D) and 0.47 (SSIMRT) without significant difference.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p><it>In-vivo </it>measurement of the dose distribution within patients' lymphocytes can be performed by detecting gamma-H2AX foci. In case of 3D and SSIMRT, the results of this method correlate with the physical calculated total body dose-distribution, but cannot be interpreted unrestrictedly due to the blood circulation. One possible application of the present method could be in radiation-protection for <it>in-vivo </it>dose estimation after accidental exposure to radiation.</p> http://www.ro-journal.com/content/6/1/62 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Huber Peter E Weber Klaus-Josef Major Gerald Sterzing Florian Swartman Benedict Zwicker Felix Thieke Christian Debus Jürgen Herfarth Klaus |
spellingShingle |
Huber Peter E Weber Klaus-Josef Major Gerald Sterzing Florian Swartman Benedict Zwicker Felix Thieke Christian Debus Jürgen Herfarth Klaus Biological in-vivo measurement of dose distribution in patients' lymphocytes by gamma-H2AX immunofluorescence staining: 3D conformal- vs. step-and-shoot IMRT of the prostate gland Radiation Oncology |
author_facet |
Huber Peter E Weber Klaus-Josef Major Gerald Sterzing Florian Swartman Benedict Zwicker Felix Thieke Christian Debus Jürgen Herfarth Klaus |
author_sort |
Huber Peter E |
title |
Biological in-vivo measurement of dose distribution in patients' lymphocytes by gamma-H2AX immunofluorescence staining: 3D conformal- vs. step-and-shoot IMRT of the prostate gland |
title_short |
Biological in-vivo measurement of dose distribution in patients' lymphocytes by gamma-H2AX immunofluorescence staining: 3D conformal- vs. step-and-shoot IMRT of the prostate gland |
title_full |
Biological in-vivo measurement of dose distribution in patients' lymphocytes by gamma-H2AX immunofluorescence staining: 3D conformal- vs. step-and-shoot IMRT of the prostate gland |
title_fullStr |
Biological in-vivo measurement of dose distribution in patients' lymphocytes by gamma-H2AX immunofluorescence staining: 3D conformal- vs. step-and-shoot IMRT of the prostate gland |
title_full_unstemmed |
Biological in-vivo measurement of dose distribution in patients' lymphocytes by gamma-H2AX immunofluorescence staining: 3D conformal- vs. step-and-shoot IMRT of the prostate gland |
title_sort |
biological in-vivo measurement of dose distribution in patients' lymphocytes by gamma-h2ax immunofluorescence staining: 3d conformal- vs. step-and-shoot imrt of the prostate gland |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
Radiation Oncology |
issn |
1748-717X |
publishDate |
2011-06-01 |
description |
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Different radiation-techniques in treating local staged prostate cancer differ in their dose- distribution. Physical phantom measurements indicate that for 3D, less healthy tissue is exposed to a relatively higher dose compared to SSIMRT. The purpose is to substantiate a dose distribution in lymphocytes <it>in-vivo </it>and to discuss the possibility of comparing it to the physical model of total body dose distribution.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>For each technique (3D and SSIMRT), blood was taken from 20 patients before and 10 min after their first fraction of radiotherapy. The isolated leukocytes were fixed 2 hours after radiation. DNA double-strand breaks (DSB) in lymphocytes' nuclei were stained immunocytochemically using the gamma-H2AX protein. Gamma-H2AX foci inside each nucleus were counted in 300 irradiated as well as 50 non-irradiated lymphocytes per patient. In addition, lymphocytes of 5 volunteer subjects were irradiated externally at different doses and processed under same conditions as the patients' lymphocytes in order to generate a calibration-line. This calibration-line assigns dose-value to mean number of gamma-H2AX foci/ nucleus. So the dose distributions in patients' lymphocytes were determined regarding to the gamma-H2AX foci distribution. With this information a cumulative dose-lymphocyte-histogram (DLH) was generated. Visualized distribution of gamma-H2AX foci, correspondingly dose per nucleus, was compared to the technical dose-volume-histogram (DVH), related to the whole body-volume.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Measured <it>in-vivo </it>(DLH) and according to the physical treatment-planning (DVH), more lymphocytes resulted with low-dose exposure (< 20% of the applied dose) and significantly fewer lymphocytes with middle-dose exposure (30%-60%) during Step-and-Shoot-IMRT, compared to conventional 3D conformal radiotherapy. The high-dose exposure (> 80%) was equal in both radiation techniques. The mean number of gamma-H2AX foci per lymphocyte was 0.49 (3D) and 0.47 (SSIMRT) without significant difference.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p><it>In-vivo </it>measurement of the dose distribution within patients' lymphocytes can be performed by detecting gamma-H2AX foci. In case of 3D and SSIMRT, the results of this method correlate with the physical calculated total body dose-distribution, but cannot be interpreted unrestrictedly due to the blood circulation. One possible application of the present method could be in radiation-protection for <it>in-vivo </it>dose estimation after accidental exposure to radiation.</p> |
url |
http://www.ro-journal.com/content/6/1/62 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT huberpetere biologicalinvivomeasurementofdosedistributioninpatientslymphocytesbygammah2aximmunofluorescencestaining3dconformalvsstepandshootimrtoftheprostategland AT weberklausjosef biologicalinvivomeasurementofdosedistributioninpatientslymphocytesbygammah2aximmunofluorescencestaining3dconformalvsstepandshootimrtoftheprostategland AT majorgerald biologicalinvivomeasurementofdosedistributioninpatientslymphocytesbygammah2aximmunofluorescencestaining3dconformalvsstepandshootimrtoftheprostategland AT sterzingflorian biologicalinvivomeasurementofdosedistributioninpatientslymphocytesbygammah2aximmunofluorescencestaining3dconformalvsstepandshootimrtoftheprostategland AT swartmanbenedict biologicalinvivomeasurementofdosedistributioninpatientslymphocytesbygammah2aximmunofluorescencestaining3dconformalvsstepandshootimrtoftheprostategland AT zwickerfelix biologicalinvivomeasurementofdosedistributioninpatientslymphocytesbygammah2aximmunofluorescencestaining3dconformalvsstepandshootimrtoftheprostategland AT thiekechristian biologicalinvivomeasurementofdosedistributioninpatientslymphocytesbygammah2aximmunofluorescencestaining3dconformalvsstepandshootimrtoftheprostategland AT debusjurgen biologicalinvivomeasurementofdosedistributioninpatientslymphocytesbygammah2aximmunofluorescencestaining3dconformalvsstepandshootimrtoftheprostategland AT herfarthklaus biologicalinvivomeasurementofdosedistributioninpatientslymphocytesbygammah2aximmunofluorescencestaining3dconformalvsstepandshootimrtoftheprostategland |
_version_ |
1725278697801383936 |