Resolving Antinomies and in Particular Legal Gaps in the Example of Relations Between Sports Law and Law of Obligations
In this paper, the authors have attempted to show and prove how antinomies and legal gaps in law are an area of great complaint, and a large and still unresolved Croatian positive law problem. Despite this, these problems are in no way acknowledged as big problems Rare professional and several acade...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Pravni fakultet Sveučilišta u Splitu
2017-01-01
|
| Series: | Zbornik Radova Pravnog Fakulteta u Splitu |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://hrcak.srce.hr/file/266340 |
| Summary: | In this paper, the authors have attempted to show and prove how antinomies and legal gaps in law are an area of great complaint, and a large and still unresolved Croatian positive law problem. Despite this, these problems are in no way acknowledged as big problems Rare professional and several academic texts bear witness to this. Of course, the authors do not claim that these are the greatest or most acute Croatian legal problems, but overall they deserve someone to start dealing with them systematically. After presenting a way of resolving antinomies and legal gaps in general, the authors have offered two concrete examples believing that they prove their theories. Both examples are related to sports law. One is related to the Ownership Act and the other to the Obligatory Obligations Act, that is, to two key laws of Croatian Civil Law. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0584-9063 1847-0459 |