Linguistic Justice for which Demos? The Democratic Legitimacy of Language Regime Choices

In the European Union language regime debate, theorists of multiculturalism and cosmopolitanism have framed their arguments in reference to different theories of justice and democracy. Philippe Van Parijs advocates the diffusion of a lingua franca, namely English, as means of changing the scale of t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Garcia Núria
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sciendo 2016-10-01
Series:Acta Universitatis Sapientiae: European and Regional Studies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1515/auseur-2016-0002
id doaj-2c0b7b2fb3cf43ac8ae0cf5ecea5acd9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2c0b7b2fb3cf43ac8ae0cf5ecea5acd92021-09-06T19:40:18ZengSciendoActa Universitatis Sapientiae: European and Regional Studies2068-75832016-10-019171410.1515/auseur-2016-0002auseur-2016-0002Linguistic Justice for which Demos? The Democratic Legitimacy of Language Regime ChoicesGarcia Núria0CEE, Sciences PoIn the European Union language regime debate, theorists of multiculturalism and cosmopolitanism have framed their arguments in reference to different theories of justice and democracy. Philippe Van Parijs advocates the diffusion of a lingua franca, namely English, as means of changing the scale of the justificatory community to the European level and allowing the creation of a transnational demos. Paradoxically, one key dimension of democracy has hardly been addressed in this discussion: the question of the democratic legitimacy of language regime choices and citizens’ preferences on the different language regime scenarios. Addressing the question of the congruence of language policy choices operated by national and European elites and ordinary citizens’ preferences, this paper argues first that the dimension of democratic legitimacy is crucial and needs to be taken into account in discussions around linguistic justice. Criticizing the assumption of a direct correspondence between individuals’ language learning choices and citizens’ language regime preferences made by different authors, the analysis shows the ambivalence of citizens’ preferences measured by survey data. The article secondly raises the question of the boundaries of the political community at which the expression of citizens’ preferences should be measured and demonstrates that the outcome and the fairness of territorial linguistic regimes may vary significantly according to the level at which this democratic legitimacy is taken into account.https://doi.org/10.1515/auseur-2016-0002linguistic justicedemocracylegitimacyeuropean unionlanguage regime
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Garcia Núria
spellingShingle Garcia Núria
Linguistic Justice for which Demos? The Democratic Legitimacy of Language Regime Choices
Acta Universitatis Sapientiae: European and Regional Studies
linguistic justice
democracy
legitimacy
european union
language regime
author_facet Garcia Núria
author_sort Garcia Núria
title Linguistic Justice for which Demos? The Democratic Legitimacy of Language Regime Choices
title_short Linguistic Justice for which Demos? The Democratic Legitimacy of Language Regime Choices
title_full Linguistic Justice for which Demos? The Democratic Legitimacy of Language Regime Choices
title_fullStr Linguistic Justice for which Demos? The Democratic Legitimacy of Language Regime Choices
title_full_unstemmed Linguistic Justice for which Demos? The Democratic Legitimacy of Language Regime Choices
title_sort linguistic justice for which demos? the democratic legitimacy of language regime choices
publisher Sciendo
series Acta Universitatis Sapientiae: European and Regional Studies
issn 2068-7583
publishDate 2016-10-01
description In the European Union language regime debate, theorists of multiculturalism and cosmopolitanism have framed their arguments in reference to different theories of justice and democracy. Philippe Van Parijs advocates the diffusion of a lingua franca, namely English, as means of changing the scale of the justificatory community to the European level and allowing the creation of a transnational demos. Paradoxically, one key dimension of democracy has hardly been addressed in this discussion: the question of the democratic legitimacy of language regime choices and citizens’ preferences on the different language regime scenarios. Addressing the question of the congruence of language policy choices operated by national and European elites and ordinary citizens’ preferences, this paper argues first that the dimension of democratic legitimacy is crucial and needs to be taken into account in discussions around linguistic justice. Criticizing the assumption of a direct correspondence between individuals’ language learning choices and citizens’ language regime preferences made by different authors, the analysis shows the ambivalence of citizens’ preferences measured by survey data. The article secondly raises the question of the boundaries of the political community at which the expression of citizens’ preferences should be measured and demonstrates that the outcome and the fairness of territorial linguistic regimes may vary significantly according to the level at which this democratic legitimacy is taken into account.
topic linguistic justice
democracy
legitimacy
european union
language regime
url https://doi.org/10.1515/auseur-2016-0002
work_keys_str_mv AT garcianuria linguisticjusticeforwhichdemosthedemocraticlegitimacyoflanguageregimechoices
_version_ 1717768776089337856