Quality Improvement: Effect of Standardized Plastic Surgery Consultation Note Templates on Charge Capture

Background:. Effective medical record documentation is imperative for both patient care and reimbursement for care provided. The purpose of this study was to compare coding/billing patterns for plastic surgery consultations before and after implementation of a standardized documentation protocol. Me...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Christine V. Schaeffer, MD, Rachel Park, MD, Jaina Lane, BA, Brent R. DeGeorge, Jr, MD, PhD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer 2021-09-01
Series:Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open
Online Access:http://journals.lww.com/prsgo/fulltext/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003726
id doaj-2bf7684d18384ae18851add95b0af494
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2bf7684d18384ae18851add95b0af4942021-09-28T10:19:15ZengWolters KluwerPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open2169-75742021-09-0199e372610.1097/GOX.0000000000003726202109000-00044Quality Improvement: Effect of Standardized Plastic Surgery Consultation Note Templates on Charge CaptureChristine V. Schaeffer, MD0Rachel Park, MD1Jaina Lane, BA2Brent R. DeGeorge, Jr, MD, PhD3From the * Department of Plastic Surgery, The University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Va.From the * Department of Plastic Surgery, The University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Va.† The University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Va.From the * Department of Plastic Surgery, The University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Va.Background:. Effective medical record documentation is imperative for both patient care and reimbursement for care provided. The purpose of this study was to compare coding/billing patterns for plastic surgery consultations before and after implementation of a standardized documentation protocol. Methods:. Standardized hand, facial trauma, and general plastic surgery consult note templates were created. Following institutional approval, records were reviewed for all plastic surgery consultations from January to October 2019. Template notes were universally implemented in July 2019. Medical coding was performed by a certified professional coder using the 1995 Evaluation and Management Review Worksheet. Coding/billing patterns between groups were compared with and without standardized documentation using univariate analysis. Results:. Seventy-five consecutive preimplementation consult notes and 75 consecutive postimplementation consult notes were selected for review. Each group included 25 hand, 25 facial trauma, and 25 general plastic surgery consultation notes. The history and physical examination components of the visit code were more frequently coded as “comprehensive”postimplementation (P = 0.000). There was no significant difference in coding for medical decision making between the two groups (P = 0.340). The final visit code was significantly higher in the postimplementation group (45.3% 99254/99284 versus 2.7%, P = 0.000), and the charges were significantly higher post implementation—average charge per consult $250 versus $203 (P = 0.000) with a 22.8% increase in total charges generated. Conclusion:. Utilization of standardized consultation note templates increases the accuracy of coding and associated billing of inpatient and emergency department plastic surgery consultations through documentation and reflection of level of service provided.http://journals.lww.com/prsgo/fulltext/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003726
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Christine V. Schaeffer, MD
Rachel Park, MD
Jaina Lane, BA
Brent R. DeGeorge, Jr, MD, PhD
spellingShingle Christine V. Schaeffer, MD
Rachel Park, MD
Jaina Lane, BA
Brent R. DeGeorge, Jr, MD, PhD
Quality Improvement: Effect of Standardized Plastic Surgery Consultation Note Templates on Charge Capture
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open
author_facet Christine V. Schaeffer, MD
Rachel Park, MD
Jaina Lane, BA
Brent R. DeGeorge, Jr, MD, PhD
author_sort Christine V. Schaeffer, MD
title Quality Improvement: Effect of Standardized Plastic Surgery Consultation Note Templates on Charge Capture
title_short Quality Improvement: Effect of Standardized Plastic Surgery Consultation Note Templates on Charge Capture
title_full Quality Improvement: Effect of Standardized Plastic Surgery Consultation Note Templates on Charge Capture
title_fullStr Quality Improvement: Effect of Standardized Plastic Surgery Consultation Note Templates on Charge Capture
title_full_unstemmed Quality Improvement: Effect of Standardized Plastic Surgery Consultation Note Templates on Charge Capture
title_sort quality improvement: effect of standardized plastic surgery consultation note templates on charge capture
publisher Wolters Kluwer
series Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open
issn 2169-7574
publishDate 2021-09-01
description Background:. Effective medical record documentation is imperative for both patient care and reimbursement for care provided. The purpose of this study was to compare coding/billing patterns for plastic surgery consultations before and after implementation of a standardized documentation protocol. Methods:. Standardized hand, facial trauma, and general plastic surgery consult note templates were created. Following institutional approval, records were reviewed for all plastic surgery consultations from January to October 2019. Template notes were universally implemented in July 2019. Medical coding was performed by a certified professional coder using the 1995 Evaluation and Management Review Worksheet. Coding/billing patterns between groups were compared with and without standardized documentation using univariate analysis. Results:. Seventy-five consecutive preimplementation consult notes and 75 consecutive postimplementation consult notes were selected for review. Each group included 25 hand, 25 facial trauma, and 25 general plastic surgery consultation notes. The history and physical examination components of the visit code were more frequently coded as “comprehensive”postimplementation (P = 0.000). There was no significant difference in coding for medical decision making between the two groups (P = 0.340). The final visit code was significantly higher in the postimplementation group (45.3% 99254/99284 versus 2.7%, P = 0.000), and the charges were significantly higher post implementation—average charge per consult $250 versus $203 (P = 0.000) with a 22.8% increase in total charges generated. Conclusion:. Utilization of standardized consultation note templates increases the accuracy of coding and associated billing of inpatient and emergency department plastic surgery consultations through documentation and reflection of level of service provided.
url http://journals.lww.com/prsgo/fulltext/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003726
work_keys_str_mv AT christinevschaeffermd qualityimprovementeffectofstandardizedplasticsurgeryconsultationnotetemplatesonchargecapture
AT rachelparkmd qualityimprovementeffectofstandardizedplasticsurgeryconsultationnotetemplatesonchargecapture
AT jainalaneba qualityimprovementeffectofstandardizedplasticsurgeryconsultationnotetemplatesonchargecapture
AT brentrdegeorgejrmdphd qualityimprovementeffectofstandardizedplasticsurgeryconsultationnotetemplatesonchargecapture
_version_ 1716866233551290368