Reflections on the variations and spatialities of (un)welcome – commentary to Gill

In this reflection, we seek to develop some of Professor Gill’s inspiring ideas on the notion of (un)welcome further. We do this, in particular, by problematizing his largely dualistic conception of the emotionally-invested, inter-personal forms of welcome contra a bureaucratic tendency to abstract...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jani Vuolteenaho, Eveliina Lyytinen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Geographical Society of Finland 2018-05-01
Series:Fennia: International Journal of Geography
Online Access:https://fennia.journal.fi/article/view/70290
id doaj-2bde3305cec34e81a29197c5d3dd3f42
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2bde3305cec34e81a29197c5d3dd3f422020-11-25T03:12:23ZengGeographical Society of FinlandFennia: International Journal of Geography1798-56172018-05-01196110.11143/fennia.70290Reflections on the variations and spatialities of (un)welcome – commentary to GillJani Vuolteenaho0Eveliina Lyytinen1University of TurkuThe Migration Institute of Finland In this reflection, we seek to develop some of Professor Gill’s inspiring ideas on the notion of (un)welcome further. We do this, in particular, by problematizing his largely dualistic conception of the emotionally-invested, inter-personal forms of welcome contra a bureaucratic tendency to abstract welcome, to hollow it out emotionally. We argue that if applied too rigidly, this dichotomy can be unwieldy for making sense of the actual socio-spatial and emotional dynamics of (un)welcome. To elaborate this criticism, we expand on the notion of welcome from three interrelated perspectives. First, we argue that besides the opposite poles of people who welcome refugees, and forces that attempt to exclude them, great many actors convey more ambiguous and contextually varying attitudes to (un)welcoming immigrants. In the light of Lefebvre’s conceptual triad of social space, we next point out that Gill’s conceptualization pays inadequate heed to the practiced and societally recompensing aspects of everyday spatiality and welcoming. Finally, we take a cue from Gill’s suggestion to analyze welcome from the emotional geographies perspective, and reflect on exclusionary and inclusionary socio-spatial processes related to refugees’ emotions (lived space) and coping tactics (practiced space). https://fennia.journal.fi/article/view/70290
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jani Vuolteenaho
Eveliina Lyytinen
spellingShingle Jani Vuolteenaho
Eveliina Lyytinen
Reflections on the variations and spatialities of (un)welcome – commentary to Gill
Fennia: International Journal of Geography
author_facet Jani Vuolteenaho
Eveliina Lyytinen
author_sort Jani Vuolteenaho
title Reflections on the variations and spatialities of (un)welcome – commentary to Gill
title_short Reflections on the variations and spatialities of (un)welcome – commentary to Gill
title_full Reflections on the variations and spatialities of (un)welcome – commentary to Gill
title_fullStr Reflections on the variations and spatialities of (un)welcome – commentary to Gill
title_full_unstemmed Reflections on the variations and spatialities of (un)welcome – commentary to Gill
title_sort reflections on the variations and spatialities of (un)welcome – commentary to gill
publisher Geographical Society of Finland
series Fennia: International Journal of Geography
issn 1798-5617
publishDate 2018-05-01
description In this reflection, we seek to develop some of Professor Gill’s inspiring ideas on the notion of (un)welcome further. We do this, in particular, by problematizing his largely dualistic conception of the emotionally-invested, inter-personal forms of welcome contra a bureaucratic tendency to abstract welcome, to hollow it out emotionally. We argue that if applied too rigidly, this dichotomy can be unwieldy for making sense of the actual socio-spatial and emotional dynamics of (un)welcome. To elaborate this criticism, we expand on the notion of welcome from three interrelated perspectives. First, we argue that besides the opposite poles of people who welcome refugees, and forces that attempt to exclude them, great many actors convey more ambiguous and contextually varying attitudes to (un)welcoming immigrants. In the light of Lefebvre’s conceptual triad of social space, we next point out that Gill’s conceptualization pays inadequate heed to the practiced and societally recompensing aspects of everyday spatiality and welcoming. Finally, we take a cue from Gill’s suggestion to analyze welcome from the emotional geographies perspective, and reflect on exclusionary and inclusionary socio-spatial processes related to refugees’ emotions (lived space) and coping tactics (practiced space).
url https://fennia.journal.fi/article/view/70290
work_keys_str_mv AT janivuolteenaho reflectionsonthevariationsandspatialitiesofunwelcomecommentarytogill
AT eveliinalyytinen reflectionsonthevariationsandspatialitiesofunwelcomecommentarytogill
_version_ 1724650769950441472