Reflections on the variations and spatialities of (un)welcome – commentary to Gill
In this reflection, we seek to develop some of Professor Gill’s inspiring ideas on the notion of (un)welcome further. We do this, in particular, by problematizing his largely dualistic conception of the emotionally-invested, inter-personal forms of welcome contra a bureaucratic tendency to abstract...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Geographical Society of Finland
2018-05-01
|
Series: | Fennia: International Journal of Geography |
Online Access: | https://fennia.journal.fi/article/view/70290 |
id |
doaj-2bde3305cec34e81a29197c5d3dd3f42 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-2bde3305cec34e81a29197c5d3dd3f422020-11-25T03:12:23ZengGeographical Society of FinlandFennia: International Journal of Geography1798-56172018-05-01196110.11143/fennia.70290Reflections on the variations and spatialities of (un)welcome – commentary to GillJani Vuolteenaho0Eveliina Lyytinen1University of TurkuThe Migration Institute of Finland In this reflection, we seek to develop some of Professor Gill’s inspiring ideas on the notion of (un)welcome further. We do this, in particular, by problematizing his largely dualistic conception of the emotionally-invested, inter-personal forms of welcome contra a bureaucratic tendency to abstract welcome, to hollow it out emotionally. We argue that if applied too rigidly, this dichotomy can be unwieldy for making sense of the actual socio-spatial and emotional dynamics of (un)welcome. To elaborate this criticism, we expand on the notion of welcome from three interrelated perspectives. First, we argue that besides the opposite poles of people who welcome refugees, and forces that attempt to exclude them, great many actors convey more ambiguous and contextually varying attitudes to (un)welcoming immigrants. In the light of Lefebvre’s conceptual triad of social space, we next point out that Gill’s conceptualization pays inadequate heed to the practiced and societally recompensing aspects of everyday spatiality and welcoming. Finally, we take a cue from Gill’s suggestion to analyze welcome from the emotional geographies perspective, and reflect on exclusionary and inclusionary socio-spatial processes related to refugees’ emotions (lived space) and coping tactics (practiced space). https://fennia.journal.fi/article/view/70290 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Jani Vuolteenaho Eveliina Lyytinen |
spellingShingle |
Jani Vuolteenaho Eveliina Lyytinen Reflections on the variations and spatialities of (un)welcome – commentary to Gill Fennia: International Journal of Geography |
author_facet |
Jani Vuolteenaho Eveliina Lyytinen |
author_sort |
Jani Vuolteenaho |
title |
Reflections on the variations and spatialities of (un)welcome – commentary to Gill |
title_short |
Reflections on the variations and spatialities of (un)welcome – commentary to Gill |
title_full |
Reflections on the variations and spatialities of (un)welcome – commentary to Gill |
title_fullStr |
Reflections on the variations and spatialities of (un)welcome – commentary to Gill |
title_full_unstemmed |
Reflections on the variations and spatialities of (un)welcome – commentary to Gill |
title_sort |
reflections on the variations and spatialities of (un)welcome – commentary to gill |
publisher |
Geographical Society of Finland |
series |
Fennia: International Journal of Geography |
issn |
1798-5617 |
publishDate |
2018-05-01 |
description |
In this reflection, we seek to develop some of Professor Gill’s inspiring ideas on the notion of (un)welcome further. We do this, in particular, by problematizing his largely dualistic conception of the emotionally-invested, inter-personal forms of welcome contra a bureaucratic tendency to abstract welcome, to hollow it out emotionally. We argue that if applied too rigidly, this dichotomy can be unwieldy for making sense of the actual socio-spatial and emotional dynamics of (un)welcome. To elaborate this criticism, we expand on the notion of welcome from three interrelated perspectives. First, we argue that besides the opposite poles of people who welcome refugees, and forces that attempt to exclude them, great many actors convey more ambiguous and contextually varying attitudes to (un)welcoming immigrants. In the light of Lefebvre’s conceptual triad of social space, we next point out that Gill’s conceptualization pays inadequate heed to the practiced and societally recompensing aspects of everyday spatiality and welcoming. Finally, we take a cue from Gill’s suggestion to analyze welcome from the emotional geographies perspective, and reflect on exclusionary and inclusionary socio-spatial processes related to refugees’ emotions (lived space) and coping tactics (practiced space).
|
url |
https://fennia.journal.fi/article/view/70290 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT janivuolteenaho reflectionsonthevariationsandspatialitiesofunwelcomecommentarytogill AT eveliinalyytinen reflectionsonthevariationsandspatialitiesofunwelcomecommentarytogill |
_version_ |
1724650769950441472 |