The Effectiveness of the Feldenkrais Method: A Systematic Review of the Evidence
The Feldenkrais Method (FM) has broad application in populations interested in improving awareness, health, and ease of function. This review aimed to update the evidence for the benefits of FM, and for which populations. A best practice systematic review protocol was devised. Included studies were...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Hindawi Limited
2015-01-01
|
Series: | Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/752160 |
id |
doaj-2bda4e44fe65479d849202798ab4ae79 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-2bda4e44fe65479d849202798ab4ae792020-11-25T00:01:27ZengHindawi LimitedEvidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine1741-427X1741-42882015-01-01201510.1155/2015/752160752160The Effectiveness of the Feldenkrais Method: A Systematic Review of the EvidenceSusan Hillier0Anthea Worley1International Centre for Allied Health Evidence, Sansom Institute of Health Research, School of Health Science, University of South Australia, P.O. Box 2471, Adelaide, SA 5001, AustraliaSchool of Health Science, University of South Australia, P.O. Box 2471, Adelaide, SA 5001, AustraliaThe Feldenkrais Method (FM) has broad application in populations interested in improving awareness, health, and ease of function. This review aimed to update the evidence for the benefits of FM, and for which populations. A best practice systematic review protocol was devised. Included studies were appraised using the Cochrane risk of bias approach and trial findings analysed individually and collectively where possible. Twenty RCTs were included (an additional 14 to an earlier systematic review). The population, outcome, and findings were highly heterogeneous. However, meta-analyses were able to be performed with 7 studies, finding in favour of the FM for improving balance in ageing populations (e.g., timed up and go test MD −1.14 sec, 95% CI −1.78, −0.49; and functional reach test MD 6.08 cm, 95% CI 3.41, 8.74). Single studies reported significant positive effects for reduced perceived effort and increased comfort, body image perception, and dexterity. Risk of bias was high, thus tempering some results. Considered as a body of evidence, effects seem to be generic, supporting the proposal that FM works on a learning paradigm rather than disease-based mechanisms. Further research is required; however, in the meantime, clinicians and professionals may promote the use of FM in populations interested in efficient physical performance and self-efficacy.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/752160 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Susan Hillier Anthea Worley |
spellingShingle |
Susan Hillier Anthea Worley The Effectiveness of the Feldenkrais Method: A Systematic Review of the Evidence Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine |
author_facet |
Susan Hillier Anthea Worley |
author_sort |
Susan Hillier |
title |
The Effectiveness of the Feldenkrais Method: A Systematic Review of the Evidence |
title_short |
The Effectiveness of the Feldenkrais Method: A Systematic Review of the Evidence |
title_full |
The Effectiveness of the Feldenkrais Method: A Systematic Review of the Evidence |
title_fullStr |
The Effectiveness of the Feldenkrais Method: A Systematic Review of the Evidence |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Effectiveness of the Feldenkrais Method: A Systematic Review of the Evidence |
title_sort |
effectiveness of the feldenkrais method: a systematic review of the evidence |
publisher |
Hindawi Limited |
series |
Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine |
issn |
1741-427X 1741-4288 |
publishDate |
2015-01-01 |
description |
The Feldenkrais Method (FM) has broad application in populations interested in improving awareness, health, and ease of function. This review aimed to update the evidence for the benefits of FM, and for which populations. A best practice systematic review protocol was devised. Included studies were appraised using the Cochrane risk of bias approach and trial findings analysed individually and collectively where possible. Twenty RCTs were included (an additional 14 to an earlier systematic review). The population, outcome, and findings were highly heterogeneous. However, meta-analyses were able to be performed with 7 studies, finding in favour of the FM for improving balance in ageing populations (e.g., timed up and go test MD −1.14 sec, 95% CI −1.78, −0.49; and functional reach test MD 6.08 cm, 95% CI 3.41, 8.74). Single studies reported significant positive effects for reduced perceived effort and increased comfort, body image perception, and dexterity. Risk of bias was high, thus tempering some results. Considered as a body of evidence, effects seem to be generic, supporting the proposal that FM works on a learning paradigm rather than disease-based mechanisms. Further research is required; however, in the meantime, clinicians and professionals may promote the use of FM in populations interested in efficient physical performance and self-efficacy. |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/752160 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT susanhillier theeffectivenessofthefeldenkraismethodasystematicreviewoftheevidence AT antheaworley theeffectivenessofthefeldenkraismethodasystematicreviewoftheevidence AT susanhillier effectivenessofthefeldenkraismethodasystematicreviewoftheevidence AT antheaworley effectivenessofthefeldenkraismethodasystematicreviewoftheevidence |
_version_ |
1725441909813411840 |