Comparison of the change in QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus and QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube results after preventive therapy for latent tuberculosis infection.
<h4>Background</h4>We investigated changes in the interferon-γ levels before and after treatment of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) using QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus) and QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube (QFT-GIT) assays. The objective was to assess whether QFT-Plus could serve as...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2020-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234700 |
id |
doaj-2bd91a949d37488e86617d3303a4b45d |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-2bd91a949d37488e86617d3303a4b45d2021-03-04T11:17:45ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032020-01-01156e023470010.1371/journal.pone.0234700Comparison of the change in QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus and QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube results after preventive therapy for latent tuberculosis infection.Ock-Hwa KimKyung-Wook JoShinhee ParkYong-Ha JoMi-Na KimHeungsup SungTae Sun Shim<h4>Background</h4>We investigated changes in the interferon-γ levels before and after treatment of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) using QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus) and QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube (QFT-GIT) assays. The objective was to assess whether QFT-Plus could serve as a biomarker of LTBI treatment response.<h4>Methods</h4>We prospectively enrolled 44 individuals whose baseline QFT-GIT and QFT-Plus showed positive results at a tertiary referral center in South Korea between March 2017 and March 2018. The results of the QFT-Plus assay were defined as positive if either or both of the antigen tubes (TB1 and/or TB2) were positive. After LTBI treatment, both tests were repeated.<h4>Results</h4>The mean age of the participants was 47.6 years. The QFT-GIT and QFT-Plus assays revealed positive results in 42/44 (95.5%) and 41/44 (93.2%) participants after LTBI treatment, showing overall agreement of 93.2%, with a Cohen's kappa value of 0.37 (fair agreement). The differences between pre- and post-LTBI treatment interferon-γ levels were measured using the QFT-GIT and QFT-Plus assays. No significant differences were noted among the 3 values: the median difference in interferon-γ value with QFT-GIT, QFT-Plus TB1, and QFT-Plus TB2 was 0.211 IU/mL (IQR, -0.337-3.347), 0.025 IU/mL (IQR, -0.338-1.368), and 0.180 IU/mL (IQR, -0.490-2.278), respectively (P = 0.401).<h4>Conclusion</h4>The change in interferon-γ levels before and after LTBI treatment measured using the QFT-Plus assay showed a similar trend to that of the QFT-GIT assay. Considering that the QFT-GIT assay is not a useful biomarker of LTBI treatment response, QFT-Plus also appears not to be useful for this purpose.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234700 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Ock-Hwa Kim Kyung-Wook Jo Shinhee Park Yong-Ha Jo Mi-Na Kim Heungsup Sung Tae Sun Shim |
spellingShingle |
Ock-Hwa Kim Kyung-Wook Jo Shinhee Park Yong-Ha Jo Mi-Na Kim Heungsup Sung Tae Sun Shim Comparison of the change in QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus and QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube results after preventive therapy for latent tuberculosis infection. PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Ock-Hwa Kim Kyung-Wook Jo Shinhee Park Yong-Ha Jo Mi-Na Kim Heungsup Sung Tae Sun Shim |
author_sort |
Ock-Hwa Kim |
title |
Comparison of the change in QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus and QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube results after preventive therapy for latent tuberculosis infection. |
title_short |
Comparison of the change in QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus and QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube results after preventive therapy for latent tuberculosis infection. |
title_full |
Comparison of the change in QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus and QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube results after preventive therapy for latent tuberculosis infection. |
title_fullStr |
Comparison of the change in QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus and QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube results after preventive therapy for latent tuberculosis infection. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of the change in QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus and QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube results after preventive therapy for latent tuberculosis infection. |
title_sort |
comparison of the change in quantiferon-tb gold plus and quantiferon-tb gold in-tube results after preventive therapy for latent tuberculosis infection. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2020-01-01 |
description |
<h4>Background</h4>We investigated changes in the interferon-γ levels before and after treatment of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) using QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus) and QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube (QFT-GIT) assays. The objective was to assess whether QFT-Plus could serve as a biomarker of LTBI treatment response.<h4>Methods</h4>We prospectively enrolled 44 individuals whose baseline QFT-GIT and QFT-Plus showed positive results at a tertiary referral center in South Korea between March 2017 and March 2018. The results of the QFT-Plus assay were defined as positive if either or both of the antigen tubes (TB1 and/or TB2) were positive. After LTBI treatment, both tests were repeated.<h4>Results</h4>The mean age of the participants was 47.6 years. The QFT-GIT and QFT-Plus assays revealed positive results in 42/44 (95.5%) and 41/44 (93.2%) participants after LTBI treatment, showing overall agreement of 93.2%, with a Cohen's kappa value of 0.37 (fair agreement). The differences between pre- and post-LTBI treatment interferon-γ levels were measured using the QFT-GIT and QFT-Plus assays. No significant differences were noted among the 3 values: the median difference in interferon-γ value with QFT-GIT, QFT-Plus TB1, and QFT-Plus TB2 was 0.211 IU/mL (IQR, -0.337-3.347), 0.025 IU/mL (IQR, -0.338-1.368), and 0.180 IU/mL (IQR, -0.490-2.278), respectively (P = 0.401).<h4>Conclusion</h4>The change in interferon-γ levels before and after LTBI treatment measured using the QFT-Plus assay showed a similar trend to that of the QFT-GIT assay. Considering that the QFT-GIT assay is not a useful biomarker of LTBI treatment response, QFT-Plus also appears not to be useful for this purpose. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234700 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT ockhwakim comparisonofthechangeinquantiferontbgoldplusandquantiferontbgoldintuberesultsafterpreventivetherapyforlatenttuberculosisinfection AT kyungwookjo comparisonofthechangeinquantiferontbgoldplusandquantiferontbgoldintuberesultsafterpreventivetherapyforlatenttuberculosisinfection AT shinheepark comparisonofthechangeinquantiferontbgoldplusandquantiferontbgoldintuberesultsafterpreventivetherapyforlatenttuberculosisinfection AT yonghajo comparisonofthechangeinquantiferontbgoldplusandquantiferontbgoldintuberesultsafterpreventivetherapyforlatenttuberculosisinfection AT minakim comparisonofthechangeinquantiferontbgoldplusandquantiferontbgoldintuberesultsafterpreventivetherapyforlatenttuberculosisinfection AT heungsupsung comparisonofthechangeinquantiferontbgoldplusandquantiferontbgoldintuberesultsafterpreventivetherapyforlatenttuberculosisinfection AT taesunshim comparisonofthechangeinquantiferontbgoldplusandquantiferontbgoldintuberesultsafterpreventivetherapyforlatenttuberculosisinfection |
_version_ |
1714804011160305664 |