Expert-led didactic versus self-directed audiovisual training of confocal laser endomicroscopy in evaluation of mucosal barrier defects

Background and study aims Confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) allows mucosal barrier defects along the intestinal epithelium to be visualized in vivo during endoscopy. Training in CLE interpretation can be achieved didactically or through self-directed learning. This study aimed to compare the effec...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Roy Huynh, Matthew Ip, Jeff Chang, Craig Haifer, Rupert W. Leong
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2018-01-01
Series:Endoscopy International Open
Online Access:http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/s-0043-114664
id doaj-2baaf3009c5d4abfae572dc0714c3499
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2baaf3009c5d4abfae572dc0714c34992020-11-25T02:38:17ZengGeorg Thieme Verlag KGEndoscopy International Open2364-37222196-97362018-01-010601E115E12210.1055/s-0043-114664Expert-led didactic versus self-directed audiovisual training of confocal laser endomicroscopy in evaluation of mucosal barrier defectsRoy Huynh0Matthew Ip1Jeff Chang2Craig Haifer3Rupert W. Leong4Faculty of Medicine, UNSW Australia, Sydney, AustraliaFaculty of Medicine, UNSW Australia, Sydney, AustraliaFaculty of Medicine, UNSW Australia, Sydney, AustraliaGastroenterology and Liver Services, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney, AustraliaFaculty of Medicine, UNSW Australia, Sydney, AustraliaBackground and study aims Confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) allows mucosal barrier defects along the intestinal epithelium to be visualized in vivo during endoscopy. Training in CLE interpretation can be achieved didactically or through self-directed learning. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of expert-led didactic with self-directed audiovisual teaching for training inexperienced analysts on how to recognize mucosal barrier defects on endoscope-based CLE (eCLE). Materials and methods This randomized controlled study involved trainee analysts who were taught how to recognize mucosal barrier defects on eCLE either didactically or through an audiovisual clip. After being trained, they evaluated 6 sets of 30 images. Image evaluation required the trainees to determine whether specific features of barrier dysfunction were present or not. Trainees in the didactic group engaged in peer discussion and received feedback after each set while this did not happen in the self-directed group. Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of both groups were compared. Results Trainees in the didactic group achieved a higher overall accuracy (87.5 % vs 85.0 %, P = 0.002) and sensitivity (84.5 % vs 80.4 %, P = 0.002) compared to trainees in the self-directed group. Interobserver agreement was higher in the didactic group (k = 0.686, 95 % CI 0.680 – 0.691, P < 0.001) than in the self-directed group (k = 0.566, 95 % CI 0.559 – 0.573, P < 0.001). Confidence (OR 6.48, 95 % CI 5.35 – 7.84, P < 0.001) and good image quality (OR 2.58, 95 % CI 2.17 – 2.82, P < 0.001) were positive predictors of accuracy. Conclusion Expert-led didactic training is more effective than self-directed audiovisual training for teaching inexperienced analysts how to recognize mucosal barrier defects on eCLE.http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/s-0043-114664
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Roy Huynh
Matthew Ip
Jeff Chang
Craig Haifer
Rupert W. Leong
spellingShingle Roy Huynh
Matthew Ip
Jeff Chang
Craig Haifer
Rupert W. Leong
Expert-led didactic versus self-directed audiovisual training of confocal laser endomicroscopy in evaluation of mucosal barrier defects
Endoscopy International Open
author_facet Roy Huynh
Matthew Ip
Jeff Chang
Craig Haifer
Rupert W. Leong
author_sort Roy Huynh
title Expert-led didactic versus self-directed audiovisual training of confocal laser endomicroscopy in evaluation of mucosal barrier defects
title_short Expert-led didactic versus self-directed audiovisual training of confocal laser endomicroscopy in evaluation of mucosal barrier defects
title_full Expert-led didactic versus self-directed audiovisual training of confocal laser endomicroscopy in evaluation of mucosal barrier defects
title_fullStr Expert-led didactic versus self-directed audiovisual training of confocal laser endomicroscopy in evaluation of mucosal barrier defects
title_full_unstemmed Expert-led didactic versus self-directed audiovisual training of confocal laser endomicroscopy in evaluation of mucosal barrier defects
title_sort expert-led didactic versus self-directed audiovisual training of confocal laser endomicroscopy in evaluation of mucosal barrier defects
publisher Georg Thieme Verlag KG
series Endoscopy International Open
issn 2364-3722
2196-9736
publishDate 2018-01-01
description Background and study aims Confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) allows mucosal barrier defects along the intestinal epithelium to be visualized in vivo during endoscopy. Training in CLE interpretation can be achieved didactically or through self-directed learning. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of expert-led didactic with self-directed audiovisual teaching for training inexperienced analysts on how to recognize mucosal barrier defects on endoscope-based CLE (eCLE). Materials and methods This randomized controlled study involved trainee analysts who were taught how to recognize mucosal barrier defects on eCLE either didactically or through an audiovisual clip. After being trained, they evaluated 6 sets of 30 images. Image evaluation required the trainees to determine whether specific features of barrier dysfunction were present or not. Trainees in the didactic group engaged in peer discussion and received feedback after each set while this did not happen in the self-directed group. Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of both groups were compared. Results Trainees in the didactic group achieved a higher overall accuracy (87.5 % vs 85.0 %, P = 0.002) and sensitivity (84.5 % vs 80.4 %, P = 0.002) compared to trainees in the self-directed group. Interobserver agreement was higher in the didactic group (k = 0.686, 95 % CI 0.680 – 0.691, P < 0.001) than in the self-directed group (k = 0.566, 95 % CI 0.559 – 0.573, P < 0.001). Confidence (OR 6.48, 95 % CI 5.35 – 7.84, P < 0.001) and good image quality (OR 2.58, 95 % CI 2.17 – 2.82, P < 0.001) were positive predictors of accuracy. Conclusion Expert-led didactic training is more effective than self-directed audiovisual training for teaching inexperienced analysts how to recognize mucosal barrier defects on eCLE.
url http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/s-0043-114664
work_keys_str_mv AT royhuynh expertleddidacticversusselfdirectedaudiovisualtrainingofconfocallaserendomicroscopyinevaluationofmucosalbarrierdefects
AT matthewip expertleddidacticversusselfdirectedaudiovisualtrainingofconfocallaserendomicroscopyinevaluationofmucosalbarrierdefects
AT jeffchang expertleddidacticversusselfdirectedaudiovisualtrainingofconfocallaserendomicroscopyinevaluationofmucosalbarrierdefects
AT craighaifer expertleddidacticversusselfdirectedaudiovisualtrainingofconfocallaserendomicroscopyinevaluationofmucosalbarrierdefects
AT rupertwleong expertleddidacticversusselfdirectedaudiovisualtrainingofconfocallaserendomicroscopyinevaluationofmucosalbarrierdefects
_version_ 1724791626136551424