Expert-led didactic versus self-directed audiovisual training of confocal laser endomicroscopy in evaluation of mucosal barrier defects
Background and study aims Confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) allows mucosal barrier defects along the intestinal epithelium to be visualized in vivo during endoscopy. Training in CLE interpretation can be achieved didactically or through self-directed learning. This study aimed to compare the effec...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
2018-01-01
|
Series: | Endoscopy International Open |
Online Access: | http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/s-0043-114664 |
id |
doaj-2baaf3009c5d4abfae572dc0714c3499 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-2baaf3009c5d4abfae572dc0714c34992020-11-25T02:38:17ZengGeorg Thieme Verlag KGEndoscopy International Open2364-37222196-97362018-01-010601E115E12210.1055/s-0043-114664Expert-led didactic versus self-directed audiovisual training of confocal laser endomicroscopy in evaluation of mucosal barrier defectsRoy Huynh0Matthew Ip1Jeff Chang2Craig Haifer3Rupert W. Leong4Faculty of Medicine, UNSW Australia, Sydney, AustraliaFaculty of Medicine, UNSW Australia, Sydney, AustraliaFaculty of Medicine, UNSW Australia, Sydney, AustraliaGastroenterology and Liver Services, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney, AustraliaFaculty of Medicine, UNSW Australia, Sydney, AustraliaBackground and study aims Confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) allows mucosal barrier defects along the intestinal epithelium to be visualized in vivo during endoscopy. Training in CLE interpretation can be achieved didactically or through self-directed learning. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of expert-led didactic with self-directed audiovisual teaching for training inexperienced analysts on how to recognize mucosal barrier defects on endoscope-based CLE (eCLE). Materials and methods This randomized controlled study involved trainee analysts who were taught how to recognize mucosal barrier defects on eCLE either didactically or through an audiovisual clip. After being trained, they evaluated 6 sets of 30 images. Image evaluation required the trainees to determine whether specific features of barrier dysfunction were present or not. Trainees in the didactic group engaged in peer discussion and received feedback after each set while this did not happen in the self-directed group. Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of both groups were compared. Results Trainees in the didactic group achieved a higher overall accuracy (87.5 % vs 85.0 %, P = 0.002) and sensitivity (84.5 % vs 80.4 %, P = 0.002) compared to trainees in the self-directed group. Interobserver agreement was higher in the didactic group (k = 0.686, 95 % CI 0.680 – 0.691, P < 0.001) than in the self-directed group (k = 0.566, 95 % CI 0.559 – 0.573, P < 0.001). Confidence (OR 6.48, 95 % CI 5.35 – 7.84, P < 0.001) and good image quality (OR 2.58, 95 % CI 2.17 – 2.82, P < 0.001) were positive predictors of accuracy. Conclusion Expert-led didactic training is more effective than self-directed audiovisual training for teaching inexperienced analysts how to recognize mucosal barrier defects on eCLE.http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/s-0043-114664 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Roy Huynh Matthew Ip Jeff Chang Craig Haifer Rupert W. Leong |
spellingShingle |
Roy Huynh Matthew Ip Jeff Chang Craig Haifer Rupert W. Leong Expert-led didactic versus self-directed audiovisual training of confocal laser endomicroscopy in evaluation of mucosal barrier defects Endoscopy International Open |
author_facet |
Roy Huynh Matthew Ip Jeff Chang Craig Haifer Rupert W. Leong |
author_sort |
Roy Huynh |
title |
Expert-led didactic versus self-directed audiovisual training of confocal laser endomicroscopy in evaluation of mucosal barrier defects |
title_short |
Expert-led didactic versus self-directed audiovisual training of confocal laser endomicroscopy in evaluation of mucosal barrier defects |
title_full |
Expert-led didactic versus self-directed audiovisual training of confocal laser endomicroscopy in evaluation of mucosal barrier defects |
title_fullStr |
Expert-led didactic versus self-directed audiovisual training of confocal laser endomicroscopy in evaluation of mucosal barrier defects |
title_full_unstemmed |
Expert-led didactic versus self-directed audiovisual training of confocal laser endomicroscopy in evaluation of mucosal barrier defects |
title_sort |
expert-led didactic versus self-directed audiovisual training of confocal laser endomicroscopy in evaluation of mucosal barrier defects |
publisher |
Georg Thieme Verlag KG |
series |
Endoscopy International Open |
issn |
2364-3722 2196-9736 |
publishDate |
2018-01-01 |
description |
Background and study aims Confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) allows mucosal barrier defects along the intestinal epithelium to be visualized in vivo during endoscopy. Training in CLE interpretation can be achieved didactically or through self-directed learning. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of expert-led didactic with self-directed audiovisual teaching for training inexperienced analysts on how to recognize mucosal barrier defects on endoscope-based CLE (eCLE).
Materials and methods This randomized controlled study involved trainee analysts who were taught how to recognize mucosal barrier defects on eCLE either didactically or through an audiovisual clip. After being trained, they evaluated 6 sets of 30 images. Image evaluation required the trainees to determine whether specific features of barrier dysfunction were present or not. Trainees in the didactic group engaged in peer discussion and received feedback after each set while this did not happen in the self-directed group. Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of both groups were compared.
Results Trainees in the didactic group achieved a higher overall accuracy (87.5 % vs 85.0 %, P = 0.002) and sensitivity (84.5 % vs 80.4 %, P = 0.002) compared to trainees in the self-directed group. Interobserver agreement was higher in the didactic group (k = 0.686, 95 % CI 0.680 – 0.691, P < 0.001) than in the self-directed group (k = 0.566, 95 % CI 0.559 – 0.573, P < 0.001). Confidence (OR 6.48, 95 % CI 5.35 – 7.84, P < 0.001) and good image quality (OR 2.58, 95 % CI 2.17 – 2.82, P < 0.001) were positive predictors of accuracy.
Conclusion Expert-led didactic training is more effective than self-directed audiovisual training for teaching inexperienced analysts how to recognize mucosal barrier defects on eCLE. |
url |
http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/s-0043-114664 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT royhuynh expertleddidacticversusselfdirectedaudiovisualtrainingofconfocallaserendomicroscopyinevaluationofmucosalbarrierdefects AT matthewip expertleddidacticversusselfdirectedaudiovisualtrainingofconfocallaserendomicroscopyinevaluationofmucosalbarrierdefects AT jeffchang expertleddidacticversusselfdirectedaudiovisualtrainingofconfocallaserendomicroscopyinevaluationofmucosalbarrierdefects AT craighaifer expertleddidacticversusselfdirectedaudiovisualtrainingofconfocallaserendomicroscopyinevaluationofmucosalbarrierdefects AT rupertwleong expertleddidacticversusselfdirectedaudiovisualtrainingofconfocallaserendomicroscopyinevaluationofmucosalbarrierdefects |
_version_ |
1724791626136551424 |