Stage 1 Registered Report: How subtle linguistic cues prevent unethical behaviors [version 4; peer review: 2 approved]
Different ways of description can easily influence people’s evaluations and behaviors. A previous study by Bryan and colleagues suggested that subtle linguistic differences in ethical reminders can differentially prevent readers’ unethical behavior. The present study aims to replicate the previous f...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
F1000 Research Ltd
2020-03-01
|
Series: | F1000Research |
Online Access: | https://f1000research.com/articles/8-1482/v4 |
id |
doaj-2ba8de4d93ae4f43a503d46d50caad7e |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-2ba8de4d93ae4f43a503d46d50caad7e2020-11-25T03:08:09ZengF1000 Research LtdF1000Research2046-14022020-03-01810.12688/f1000research.20183.425185Stage 1 Registered Report: How subtle linguistic cues prevent unethical behaviors [version 4; peer review: 2 approved]Wen Guo0Huanxu Liu1Jingwen Yang2Yuqi Mo3Can Zhong4Yuki Yamada5Graduate School of Human-Environment Studies, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, JapanGraduate School of Human-Environment Studies, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, JapanGraduate School of Human-Environment Studies, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, JapanGraduate School of Human-Environment Studies, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, JapanGraduate School of Human-Environment Studies, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, JapanFaculty of Arts and Science, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, JapanDifferent ways of description can easily influence people’s evaluations and behaviors. A previous study by Bryan and colleagues suggested that subtle linguistic differences in ethical reminders can differentially prevent readers’ unethical behavior. The present study aims to replicate the previous finding in the Japanese context, additionally exploring the influence of unfamiliar instruction words that capture participants’ attention. In two experiments, which are planned to be conducted online, participants are asked to make 10 coin-tosses and report the number of “heads” results, indicating the amount of money that they can earn. We will manipulate instructions (“Don’t cheat” vs. “Don’t be a cheater” vs. baseline as a control) for each participant group, including nearly 270 participants (Experiment 1). Next, we will conduct an extended experiment with an additional task in which more attention is directed toward the text (Experiment 2). Through these registered experiments, we examine the credibility of the previous finding that type of instruction affects the occurrence of unethical behaviors.https://f1000research.com/articles/8-1482/v4 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Wen Guo Huanxu Liu Jingwen Yang Yuqi Mo Can Zhong Yuki Yamada |
spellingShingle |
Wen Guo Huanxu Liu Jingwen Yang Yuqi Mo Can Zhong Yuki Yamada Stage 1 Registered Report: How subtle linguistic cues prevent unethical behaviors [version 4; peer review: 2 approved] F1000Research |
author_facet |
Wen Guo Huanxu Liu Jingwen Yang Yuqi Mo Can Zhong Yuki Yamada |
author_sort |
Wen Guo |
title |
Stage 1 Registered Report: How subtle linguistic cues prevent unethical behaviors [version 4; peer review: 2 approved] |
title_short |
Stage 1 Registered Report: How subtle linguistic cues prevent unethical behaviors [version 4; peer review: 2 approved] |
title_full |
Stage 1 Registered Report: How subtle linguistic cues prevent unethical behaviors [version 4; peer review: 2 approved] |
title_fullStr |
Stage 1 Registered Report: How subtle linguistic cues prevent unethical behaviors [version 4; peer review: 2 approved] |
title_full_unstemmed |
Stage 1 Registered Report: How subtle linguistic cues prevent unethical behaviors [version 4; peer review: 2 approved] |
title_sort |
stage 1 registered report: how subtle linguistic cues prevent unethical behaviors [version 4; peer review: 2 approved] |
publisher |
F1000 Research Ltd |
series |
F1000Research |
issn |
2046-1402 |
publishDate |
2020-03-01 |
description |
Different ways of description can easily influence people’s evaluations and behaviors. A previous study by Bryan and colleagues suggested that subtle linguistic differences in ethical reminders can differentially prevent readers’ unethical behavior. The present study aims to replicate the previous finding in the Japanese context, additionally exploring the influence of unfamiliar instruction words that capture participants’ attention. In two experiments, which are planned to be conducted online, participants are asked to make 10 coin-tosses and report the number of “heads” results, indicating the amount of money that they can earn. We will manipulate instructions (“Don’t cheat” vs. “Don’t be a cheater” vs. baseline as a control) for each participant group, including nearly 270 participants (Experiment 1). Next, we will conduct an extended experiment with an additional task in which more attention is directed toward the text (Experiment 2). Through these registered experiments, we examine the credibility of the previous finding that type of instruction affects the occurrence of unethical behaviors. |
url |
https://f1000research.com/articles/8-1482/v4 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT wenguo stage1registeredreporthowsubtlelinguisticcuespreventunethicalbehaviorsversion4peerreview2approved AT huanxuliu stage1registeredreporthowsubtlelinguisticcuespreventunethicalbehaviorsversion4peerreview2approved AT jingwenyang stage1registeredreporthowsubtlelinguisticcuespreventunethicalbehaviorsversion4peerreview2approved AT yuqimo stage1registeredreporthowsubtlelinguisticcuespreventunethicalbehaviorsversion4peerreview2approved AT canzhong stage1registeredreporthowsubtlelinguisticcuespreventunethicalbehaviorsversion4peerreview2approved AT yukiyamada stage1registeredreporthowsubtlelinguisticcuespreventunethicalbehaviorsversion4peerreview2approved |
_version_ |
1724667325263642624 |