Stage 1 Registered Report: How subtle linguistic cues prevent unethical behaviors [version 4; peer review: 2 approved]

Different ways of description can easily influence people’s evaluations and behaviors. A previous study by Bryan and colleagues suggested that subtle linguistic differences in ethical reminders can differentially prevent readers’ unethical behavior. The present study aims to replicate the previous f...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wen Guo, Huanxu Liu, Jingwen Yang, Yuqi Mo, Can Zhong, Yuki Yamada
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: F1000 Research Ltd 2020-03-01
Series:F1000Research
Online Access:https://f1000research.com/articles/8-1482/v4
id doaj-2ba8de4d93ae4f43a503d46d50caad7e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2ba8de4d93ae4f43a503d46d50caad7e2020-11-25T03:08:09ZengF1000 Research LtdF1000Research2046-14022020-03-01810.12688/f1000research.20183.425185Stage 1 Registered Report: How subtle linguistic cues prevent unethical behaviors [version 4; peer review: 2 approved]Wen Guo0Huanxu Liu1Jingwen Yang2Yuqi Mo3Can Zhong4Yuki Yamada5Graduate School of Human-Environment Studies, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, JapanGraduate School of Human-Environment Studies, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, JapanGraduate School of Human-Environment Studies, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, JapanGraduate School of Human-Environment Studies, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, JapanGraduate School of Human-Environment Studies, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, JapanFaculty of Arts and Science, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, JapanDifferent ways of description can easily influence people’s evaluations and behaviors. A previous study by Bryan and colleagues suggested that subtle linguistic differences in ethical reminders can differentially prevent readers’ unethical behavior. The present study aims to replicate the previous finding in the Japanese context, additionally exploring the influence of unfamiliar instruction words that capture participants’ attention. In two experiments, which are planned to be conducted online, participants are asked to make 10 coin-tosses and report the number of “heads” results, indicating the amount of money that they can earn. We will manipulate instructions (“Don’t cheat” vs. “Don’t be a cheater” vs. baseline as a control) for each participant group, including nearly 270 participants (Experiment 1). Next, we will conduct an extended experiment with an additional task in which more attention is directed toward the text (Experiment 2). Through these registered experiments, we examine the credibility of the previous finding that type of instruction affects the occurrence of unethical behaviors.https://f1000research.com/articles/8-1482/v4
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Wen Guo
Huanxu Liu
Jingwen Yang
Yuqi Mo
Can Zhong
Yuki Yamada
spellingShingle Wen Guo
Huanxu Liu
Jingwen Yang
Yuqi Mo
Can Zhong
Yuki Yamada
Stage 1 Registered Report: How subtle linguistic cues prevent unethical behaviors [version 4; peer review: 2 approved]
F1000Research
author_facet Wen Guo
Huanxu Liu
Jingwen Yang
Yuqi Mo
Can Zhong
Yuki Yamada
author_sort Wen Guo
title Stage 1 Registered Report: How subtle linguistic cues prevent unethical behaviors [version 4; peer review: 2 approved]
title_short Stage 1 Registered Report: How subtle linguistic cues prevent unethical behaviors [version 4; peer review: 2 approved]
title_full Stage 1 Registered Report: How subtle linguistic cues prevent unethical behaviors [version 4; peer review: 2 approved]
title_fullStr Stage 1 Registered Report: How subtle linguistic cues prevent unethical behaviors [version 4; peer review: 2 approved]
title_full_unstemmed Stage 1 Registered Report: How subtle linguistic cues prevent unethical behaviors [version 4; peer review: 2 approved]
title_sort stage 1 registered report: how subtle linguistic cues prevent unethical behaviors [version 4; peer review: 2 approved]
publisher F1000 Research Ltd
series F1000Research
issn 2046-1402
publishDate 2020-03-01
description Different ways of description can easily influence people’s evaluations and behaviors. A previous study by Bryan and colleagues suggested that subtle linguistic differences in ethical reminders can differentially prevent readers’ unethical behavior. The present study aims to replicate the previous finding in the Japanese context, additionally exploring the influence of unfamiliar instruction words that capture participants’ attention. In two experiments, which are planned to be conducted online, participants are asked to make 10 coin-tosses and report the number of “heads” results, indicating the amount of money that they can earn. We will manipulate instructions (“Don’t cheat” vs. “Don’t be a cheater” vs. baseline as a control) for each participant group, including nearly 270 participants (Experiment 1). Next, we will conduct an extended experiment with an additional task in which more attention is directed toward the text (Experiment 2). Through these registered experiments, we examine the credibility of the previous finding that type of instruction affects the occurrence of unethical behaviors.
url https://f1000research.com/articles/8-1482/v4
work_keys_str_mv AT wenguo stage1registeredreporthowsubtlelinguisticcuespreventunethicalbehaviorsversion4peerreview2approved
AT huanxuliu stage1registeredreporthowsubtlelinguisticcuespreventunethicalbehaviorsversion4peerreview2approved
AT jingwenyang stage1registeredreporthowsubtlelinguisticcuespreventunethicalbehaviorsversion4peerreview2approved
AT yuqimo stage1registeredreporthowsubtlelinguisticcuespreventunethicalbehaviorsversion4peerreview2approved
AT canzhong stage1registeredreporthowsubtlelinguisticcuespreventunethicalbehaviorsversion4peerreview2approved
AT yukiyamada stage1registeredreporthowsubtlelinguisticcuespreventunethicalbehaviorsversion4peerreview2approved
_version_ 1724667325263642624