The Complexity of Ageism. A Proposed Typology
Comparing data from a contemporary (2002) study and a study from 1984, it was found that, now as then, people display seemingly contradictory constellations of attitudes toward old people. Large proportions of respondents, now as then, advocate more influence and space for the 65+ group, at the sam...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Linköping University Electronic Press
2006-06-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Ageing and Later Life |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://journal.ep.liu.se/IJAL/article/view/1105 |
id |
doaj-2ba22c45828b4449973166d7ef8248e9 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-2ba22c45828b4449973166d7ef8248e92020-11-25T00:15:13ZengLinköping University Electronic PressInternational Journal of Ageing and Later Life1652-86702006-06-011110.3384/ijal.1652-8670.061143The Complexity of Ageism. A Proposed TypologyLars Tornstam0 Department of Sociology, Uppsala University, Sweden Comparing data from a contemporary (2002) study and a study from 1984, it was found that, now as then, people display seemingly contradictory constellations of attitudes toward old people. Large proportions of respondents, now as then, advocate more influence and space for the 65+ group, at the same time as many feel that no one in the parliament should be above the age of 65. This contradiction becomes intelligible when the conceptions of and behavioral dispositions toward old people are combined in a new proposed typology of ageism, which is the result of a study conducted in 2002 and reported in this article. This new typology includes the Pitying Positive, the No Fuzz, the Consistently Negative and the Consistently Positive. These types are empirically described, and use of the typology is exemplified by focusing on ageist attitudes toward parliament membership. https://journal.ep.liu.se/IJAL/article/view/1105Ageismattitudestypologygender |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Lars Tornstam |
spellingShingle |
Lars Tornstam The Complexity of Ageism. A Proposed Typology International Journal of Ageing and Later Life Ageism attitudes typology gender |
author_facet |
Lars Tornstam |
author_sort |
Lars Tornstam |
title |
The Complexity of Ageism. A Proposed Typology |
title_short |
The Complexity of Ageism. A Proposed Typology |
title_full |
The Complexity of Ageism. A Proposed Typology |
title_fullStr |
The Complexity of Ageism. A Proposed Typology |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Complexity of Ageism. A Proposed Typology |
title_sort |
complexity of ageism. a proposed typology |
publisher |
Linköping University Electronic Press |
series |
International Journal of Ageing and Later Life |
issn |
1652-8670 |
publishDate |
2006-06-01 |
description |
Comparing data from a contemporary (2002) study and a study from 1984, it was found that, now as then, people display seemingly contradictory constellations of attitudes toward old people. Large proportions of respondents, now as then, advocate more influence and space for the 65+ group, at the same time as many feel that no one in the parliament should be above the age of 65. This contradiction becomes intelligible when the conceptions of and behavioral dispositions toward old people are combined in a new proposed typology of ageism, which is the result of a study conducted in 2002 and reported in this article. This new typology includes the Pitying Positive, the No Fuzz, the Consistently Negative and the Consistently Positive. These types are empirically described, and use of the typology is exemplified by focusing on ageist attitudes toward parliament membership.
|
topic |
Ageism attitudes typology gender |
url |
https://journal.ep.liu.se/IJAL/article/view/1105 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT larstornstam thecomplexityofageismaproposedtypology AT larstornstam complexityofageismaproposedtypology |
_version_ |
1725388026153009152 |