Why Collaborative Care for Depressed Patients is so Difficult: A Belgian Qualitative Study
Although current guidelines recommend collaborative care for severely depressed patients, few patients get adequate treatment. In this study we aimed to identify the thresholds for interdisciplinary collaboration amongst practitioners when treating severely depressed patients. In addition, we aimed...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Ubiquity Press
2017-06-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Integrated Care |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.ijic.org/articles/2491 |
id |
doaj-2b3ddc3bfe744df782f66117831d6650 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-2b3ddc3bfe744df782f66117831d66502020-11-24T21:33:14ZengUbiquity PressInternational Journal of Integrated Care1568-41562017-06-0117210.5334/ijic.24912638Why Collaborative Care for Depressed Patients is so Difficult: A Belgian Qualitative StudyKris Van den Broeck0Frédéric Ketterer1Roy Remmen2Marc Vanmeerbeek3Marianne Destoop4Geert Dom5University of AntwerpUniversity of LiègeUniversity of AntwerpUniversity of LiègeUniversity of Antwerp; Psychiatric Centre Brothers Alexianen, BoechoutUniversity of Antwerp; Psychiatric Centre Brothers Alexianen, BoechoutAlthough current guidelines recommend collaborative care for severely depressed patients, few patients get adequate treatment. In this study we aimed to identify the thresholds for interdisciplinary collaboration amongst practitioners when treating severely depressed patients. In addition, we aimed to identify specific and feasible steps that may add to improved collaboration amongst first and second level Belgian health care providers when treating depressed patients. In two standard focus groups (n = 8; n = 12), general practitioners and psychiatrists first outlined current practice and its shortcomings. In a next phase, the same participants were gathered in nominal groups to identify and prioritise steps that could give rise to improved collaboration. Thematic analyses were performed. Though some barriers for interdisciplinary collaboration may seem easy to overcome, participants stressed the importance of certain boundary conditions on a macro- (e.g., financing of care, secure communication technology) and meso-level (e.g., support for first level practitioner). Findings are discussed against the background of frameworks on collaboration in healthcare and recent developments in mental health care.http://www.ijic.org/articles/2491collaborative caremajor depressive disorderprimary caregeneral practicemental health servicesqualitative study |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Kris Van den Broeck Frédéric Ketterer Roy Remmen Marc Vanmeerbeek Marianne Destoop Geert Dom |
spellingShingle |
Kris Van den Broeck Frédéric Ketterer Roy Remmen Marc Vanmeerbeek Marianne Destoop Geert Dom Why Collaborative Care for Depressed Patients is so Difficult: A Belgian Qualitative Study International Journal of Integrated Care collaborative care major depressive disorder primary care general practice mental health services qualitative study |
author_facet |
Kris Van den Broeck Frédéric Ketterer Roy Remmen Marc Vanmeerbeek Marianne Destoop Geert Dom |
author_sort |
Kris Van den Broeck |
title |
Why Collaborative Care for Depressed Patients is so Difficult: A Belgian Qualitative Study |
title_short |
Why Collaborative Care for Depressed Patients is so Difficult: A Belgian Qualitative Study |
title_full |
Why Collaborative Care for Depressed Patients is so Difficult: A Belgian Qualitative Study |
title_fullStr |
Why Collaborative Care for Depressed Patients is so Difficult: A Belgian Qualitative Study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Why Collaborative Care for Depressed Patients is so Difficult: A Belgian Qualitative Study |
title_sort |
why collaborative care for depressed patients is so difficult: a belgian qualitative study |
publisher |
Ubiquity Press |
series |
International Journal of Integrated Care |
issn |
1568-4156 |
publishDate |
2017-06-01 |
description |
Although current guidelines recommend collaborative care for severely depressed patients, few patients get adequate treatment. In this study we aimed to identify the thresholds for interdisciplinary collaboration amongst practitioners when treating severely depressed patients. In addition, we aimed to identify specific and feasible steps that may add to improved collaboration amongst first and second level Belgian health care providers when treating depressed patients. In two standard focus groups (n = 8; n = 12), general practitioners and psychiatrists first outlined current practice and its shortcomings. In a next phase, the same participants were gathered in nominal groups to identify and prioritise steps that could give rise to improved collaboration. Thematic analyses were performed. Though some barriers for interdisciplinary collaboration may seem easy to overcome, participants stressed the importance of certain boundary conditions on a macro- (e.g., financing of care, secure communication technology) and meso-level (e.g., support for first level practitioner). Findings are discussed against the background of frameworks on collaboration in healthcare and recent developments in mental health care. |
topic |
collaborative care major depressive disorder primary care general practice mental health services qualitative study |
url |
http://www.ijic.org/articles/2491 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT krisvandenbroeck whycollaborativecarefordepressedpatientsissodifficultabelgianqualitativestudy AT fredericketterer whycollaborativecarefordepressedpatientsissodifficultabelgianqualitativestudy AT royremmen whycollaborativecarefordepressedpatientsissodifficultabelgianqualitativestudy AT marcvanmeerbeek whycollaborativecarefordepressedpatientsissodifficultabelgianqualitativestudy AT mariannedestoop whycollaborativecarefordepressedpatientsissodifficultabelgianqualitativestudy AT geertdom whycollaborativecarefordepressedpatientsissodifficultabelgianqualitativestudy |
_version_ |
1725954192960389120 |