Why Collaborative Care for Depressed Patients is so Difficult: A Belgian Qualitative Study

Although current guidelines recommend collaborative care for severely depressed patients, few patients get adequate treatment. In this study we aimed to identify the thresholds for interdisciplinary collaboration amongst practitioners when treating severely depressed patients. In addition, we aimed...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kris Van den Broeck, Frédéric Ketterer, Roy Remmen, Marc Vanmeerbeek, Marianne Destoop, Geert Dom
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Ubiquity Press 2017-06-01
Series:International Journal of Integrated Care
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ijic.org/articles/2491
id doaj-2b3ddc3bfe744df782f66117831d6650
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2b3ddc3bfe744df782f66117831d66502020-11-24T21:33:14ZengUbiquity PressInternational Journal of Integrated Care1568-41562017-06-0117210.5334/ijic.24912638Why Collaborative Care for Depressed Patients is so Difficult: A Belgian Qualitative StudyKris Van den Broeck0Frédéric Ketterer1Roy Remmen2Marc Vanmeerbeek3Marianne Destoop4Geert Dom5University of AntwerpUniversity of LiègeUniversity of AntwerpUniversity of LiègeUniversity of Antwerp; Psychiatric Centre Brothers Alexianen, BoechoutUniversity of Antwerp; Psychiatric Centre Brothers Alexianen, BoechoutAlthough current guidelines recommend collaborative care for severely depressed patients, few patients get adequate treatment. In this study we aimed to identify the thresholds for interdisciplinary collaboration amongst practitioners when treating severely depressed patients. In addition, we aimed to identify specific and feasible steps that may add to improved collaboration amongst first and second level Belgian health care providers when treating depressed patients. In two standard focus groups (n = 8; n = 12), general practitioners and psychiatrists first outlined current practice and its shortcomings. In a next phase, the same participants were gathered in nominal groups to identify and prioritise steps that could give rise to improved collaboration. Thematic analyses were performed. Though some barriers for interdisciplinary collaboration may seem easy to overcome, participants stressed the importance of certain boundary conditions on a macro- (e.g., financing of care, secure communication technology) and meso-level (e.g., support for first level practitioner). Findings are discussed against the background of frameworks on collaboration in healthcare and recent developments in mental health care.http://www.ijic.org/articles/2491collaborative caremajor depressive disorderprimary caregeneral practicemental health servicesqualitative study
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kris Van den Broeck
Frédéric Ketterer
Roy Remmen
Marc Vanmeerbeek
Marianne Destoop
Geert Dom
spellingShingle Kris Van den Broeck
Frédéric Ketterer
Roy Remmen
Marc Vanmeerbeek
Marianne Destoop
Geert Dom
Why Collaborative Care for Depressed Patients is so Difficult: A Belgian Qualitative Study
International Journal of Integrated Care
collaborative care
major depressive disorder
primary care
general practice
mental health services
qualitative study
author_facet Kris Van den Broeck
Frédéric Ketterer
Roy Remmen
Marc Vanmeerbeek
Marianne Destoop
Geert Dom
author_sort Kris Van den Broeck
title Why Collaborative Care for Depressed Patients is so Difficult: A Belgian Qualitative Study
title_short Why Collaborative Care for Depressed Patients is so Difficult: A Belgian Qualitative Study
title_full Why Collaborative Care for Depressed Patients is so Difficult: A Belgian Qualitative Study
title_fullStr Why Collaborative Care for Depressed Patients is so Difficult: A Belgian Qualitative Study
title_full_unstemmed Why Collaborative Care for Depressed Patients is so Difficult: A Belgian Qualitative Study
title_sort why collaborative care for depressed patients is so difficult: a belgian qualitative study
publisher Ubiquity Press
series International Journal of Integrated Care
issn 1568-4156
publishDate 2017-06-01
description Although current guidelines recommend collaborative care for severely depressed patients, few patients get adequate treatment. In this study we aimed to identify the thresholds for interdisciplinary collaboration amongst practitioners when treating severely depressed patients. In addition, we aimed to identify specific and feasible steps that may add to improved collaboration amongst first and second level Belgian health care providers when treating depressed patients. In two standard focus groups (n = 8; n = 12), general practitioners and psychiatrists first outlined current practice and its shortcomings. In a next phase, the same participants were gathered in nominal groups to identify and prioritise steps that could give rise to improved collaboration. Thematic analyses were performed. Though some barriers for interdisciplinary collaboration may seem easy to overcome, participants stressed the importance of certain boundary conditions on a macro- (e.g., financing of care, secure communication technology) and meso-level (e.g., support for first level practitioner). Findings are discussed against the background of frameworks on collaboration in healthcare and recent developments in mental health care.
topic collaborative care
major depressive disorder
primary care
general practice
mental health services
qualitative study
url http://www.ijic.org/articles/2491
work_keys_str_mv AT krisvandenbroeck whycollaborativecarefordepressedpatientsissodifficultabelgianqualitativestudy
AT fredericketterer whycollaborativecarefordepressedpatientsissodifficultabelgianqualitativestudy
AT royremmen whycollaborativecarefordepressedpatientsissodifficultabelgianqualitativestudy
AT marcvanmeerbeek whycollaborativecarefordepressedpatientsissodifficultabelgianqualitativestudy
AT mariannedestoop whycollaborativecarefordepressedpatientsissodifficultabelgianqualitativestudy
AT geertdom whycollaborativecarefordepressedpatientsissodifficultabelgianqualitativestudy
_version_ 1725954192960389120