The theory and syntactic representation of control structures: An analysis from Amharic
This paper conducts a detailed syntactic analysis of control structures in Amharic and sheds light on the current approaches to their syntactic representation and the operation thereof. Amharic control structures consist of the following components: (i) they are marked by the specific clause marker...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Open Library of Humanities
2017-11-01
|
Series: | Glossa |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.glossa-journal.org/articles/277 |
id |
doaj-2b26b2948ca64948be452cf48f9335aa |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-2b26b2948ca64948be452cf48f9335aa2021-09-02T01:44:16ZengOpen Library of HumanitiesGlossa2397-18352017-11-012110.5334/gjgl.277153The theory and syntactic representation of control structures: An analysis from AmharicTommi Leung0Girma Halefom1United Arab Emirates University, Al-Ain7354 de Gaspe Ap. #4, H2R 1Z8 Montreal, QuebecThis paper conducts a detailed syntactic analysis of control structures in Amharic and sheds light on the current approaches to their syntactic representation and the operation thereof. Amharic control structures consist of the following components: (i) they are marked by the specific clause marker (CM) 'l?-'; (ii) the control clause always contains an imperfective verb; (iii) the control predicate is fully inflected by phi-features which are coindexical to the matrix subject; (iv) the subject of the control clause is a PRO; and (v) only exhaustive subject control is licensed. Amharic control poses a challenge to Landau (2014)’s proposal that the control possibility stems from particular combinations of tense and agreement features of the control predicate. Instead we claim that Amharic data fit better in the analysis of future infinitives (Wurmbrand 2014) and prospective aspect (Kratzer 2011; Matthewson 2012). In addition, the PRO-analysis of Amharic control also entails that the Movement Theory of Control (MTC) is disfavored.https://www.glossa-journal.org/articles/277Amharicaspectclause markercontrolembedded clauseMovement Theory of ControlPRO-analysis |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Tommi Leung Girma Halefom |
spellingShingle |
Tommi Leung Girma Halefom The theory and syntactic representation of control structures: An analysis from Amharic Glossa Amharic aspect clause marker control embedded clause Movement Theory of Control PRO-analysis |
author_facet |
Tommi Leung Girma Halefom |
author_sort |
Tommi Leung |
title |
The theory and syntactic representation of control structures: An analysis from Amharic |
title_short |
The theory and syntactic representation of control structures: An analysis from Amharic |
title_full |
The theory and syntactic representation of control structures: An analysis from Amharic |
title_fullStr |
The theory and syntactic representation of control structures: An analysis from Amharic |
title_full_unstemmed |
The theory and syntactic representation of control structures: An analysis from Amharic |
title_sort |
theory and syntactic representation of control structures: an analysis from amharic |
publisher |
Open Library of Humanities |
series |
Glossa |
issn |
2397-1835 |
publishDate |
2017-11-01 |
description |
This paper conducts a detailed syntactic analysis of control structures in Amharic and sheds light on the current approaches to their syntactic representation and the operation thereof. Amharic control structures consist of the following components: (i) they are marked by the specific clause marker (CM) 'l?-'; (ii) the control clause always contains an imperfective verb; (iii) the control predicate is fully inflected by phi-features which are coindexical to the matrix subject; (iv) the subject of the control clause is a PRO; and (v) only exhaustive subject control is licensed. Amharic control poses a challenge to Landau (2014)’s proposal that the control possibility stems from particular combinations of tense and agreement features of the control predicate. Instead we claim that Amharic data fit better in the analysis of future infinitives (Wurmbrand 2014) and prospective aspect (Kratzer 2011; Matthewson 2012). In addition, the PRO-analysis of Amharic control also entails that the Movement Theory of Control (MTC) is disfavored. |
topic |
Amharic aspect clause marker control embedded clause Movement Theory of Control PRO-analysis |
url |
https://www.glossa-journal.org/articles/277 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT tommileung thetheoryandsyntacticrepresentationofcontrolstructuresananalysisfromamharic AT girmahalefom thetheoryandsyntacticrepresentationofcontrolstructuresananalysisfromamharic AT tommileung theoryandsyntacticrepresentationofcontrolstructuresananalysisfromamharic AT girmahalefom theoryandsyntacticrepresentationofcontrolstructuresananalysisfromamharic |
_version_ |
1721181661808295936 |