Heads or tails: confusion about “proximal” and “distal” terminology for pancreaticobiliary anatomy

Background and study aims The anatomical meaning of the terms “proximal” and “distal” in relation to the pancreaticobiliary anatomy can be confusing. We aimed to investigate practice patterns of use of the terms “proximal” and “distal” for pancreaticobiliary anatomy amongst various medical specialti...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Harshit S. Khara, Truptesh H. Kothari, Amitpal S. Johal, Shivangi T. Kothari, Nina Ahuja, Ashok Bhanushali, Anil Kotru, Andrea Berger, Vivek Kaul, Seth A. Gross, Christopher J. DiMaio, William B. Hale, Rami Abbass, Marvin Ryou, Amrita Sethi, Brian G. Turner, Paul Fockens, David L. Diehl
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2018-07-01
Series:Endoscopy International Open
Online Access:http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/a-0605-3331
id doaj-2b1d0c55443c42b0a041f1620a7f7a86
record_format Article
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Harshit S. Khara
Truptesh H. Kothari
Amitpal S. Johal
Shivangi T. Kothari
Nina Ahuja
Ashok Bhanushali
Anil Kotru
Andrea Berger
Vivek Kaul
Seth A. Gross
Christopher J. DiMaio
William B. Hale
Rami Abbass
Marvin Ryou
Amrita Sethi
Brian G. Turner
Paul Fockens
David L. Diehl
spellingShingle Harshit S. Khara
Truptesh H. Kothari
Amitpal S. Johal
Shivangi T. Kothari
Nina Ahuja
Ashok Bhanushali
Anil Kotru
Andrea Berger
Vivek Kaul
Seth A. Gross
Christopher J. DiMaio
William B. Hale
Rami Abbass
Marvin Ryou
Amrita Sethi
Brian G. Turner
Paul Fockens
David L. Diehl
Heads or tails: confusion about “proximal” and “distal” terminology for pancreaticobiliary anatomy
Endoscopy International Open
author_facet Harshit S. Khara
Truptesh H. Kothari
Amitpal S. Johal
Shivangi T. Kothari
Nina Ahuja
Ashok Bhanushali
Anil Kotru
Andrea Berger
Vivek Kaul
Seth A. Gross
Christopher J. DiMaio
William B. Hale
Rami Abbass
Marvin Ryou
Amrita Sethi
Brian G. Turner
Paul Fockens
David L. Diehl
author_sort Harshit S. Khara
title Heads or tails: confusion about “proximal” and “distal” terminology for pancreaticobiliary anatomy
title_short Heads or tails: confusion about “proximal” and “distal” terminology for pancreaticobiliary anatomy
title_full Heads or tails: confusion about “proximal” and “distal” terminology for pancreaticobiliary anatomy
title_fullStr Heads or tails: confusion about “proximal” and “distal” terminology for pancreaticobiliary anatomy
title_full_unstemmed Heads or tails: confusion about “proximal” and “distal” terminology for pancreaticobiliary anatomy
title_sort heads or tails: confusion about “proximal” and “distal” terminology for pancreaticobiliary anatomy
publisher Georg Thieme Verlag KG
series Endoscopy International Open
issn 2364-3722
2196-9736
publishDate 2018-07-01
description Background and study aims The anatomical meaning of the terms “proximal” and “distal” in relation to the pancreaticobiliary anatomy can be confusing. We aimed to investigate practice patterns of use of the terms “proximal” and “distal” for pancreaticobiliary anatomy amongst various medical specialties. Materials and methods An online survey link to a normal pancreaticobiliary diagram was emailed to a multispecialty physician pool. Respondents were asked to label various parts of the common bile duct (CBD) and pancreatic duct (PD) using the terms “proximal,” “distal,” “not sure,” or “other.” Variability in use of these terms between specialties was assessed. Results We received 370 completed surveys from 182 gastroenterologists (49.2 %), 97 surgeons (26.2 %), 68 radiologists (18.4 %), and 23 other physicians (6.2 %). There was overall consensus in describing the upper/sub-hepatic CBD as “proximal CBD” (73.8 %, P = 0.1499) and the lower/pre-ampullary portion as “distal CBD” (84.6 %, P = 0.1821). However, there was marked variability when describing the PD. The PD in the head of the pancreas was labeled as “proximal PD” by 42.4 % and “distal PD” also by 42.4 % (P < 0.0001); and in the tail as “proximal PD” by 41.4 % and “distal PD” by 43.2 % (P < 0.0001). Only 13.8 % of respondents used descriptive terminology (“PD in the head” or “PD in the tail”) for the PD. Radiologists most often used descriptive terminology for both the CBD and PD. Surgeons most consistently called “proximal PD” in the head, and “distal PD” in the tail of the pancreas. Conclusions Although use of the terms “proximal” and “distal” is still very common to describe pancreaticobiliary anatomy, there is a discordance about its meaning, particularly for the PD. Use of descriptive terminology may be a more accurate alternative to prior ambiguous terminologies such as “proximal” or “distal” and can serve to improve communication and decrease the possibility of medical errors.
url http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/a-0605-3331
work_keys_str_mv AT harshitskhara headsortailsconfusionaboutproximalanddistalterminologyforpancreaticobiliaryanatomy
AT trupteshhkothari headsortailsconfusionaboutproximalanddistalterminologyforpancreaticobiliaryanatomy
AT amitpalsjohal headsortailsconfusionaboutproximalanddistalterminologyforpancreaticobiliaryanatomy
AT shivangitkothari headsortailsconfusionaboutproximalanddistalterminologyforpancreaticobiliaryanatomy
AT ninaahuja headsortailsconfusionaboutproximalanddistalterminologyforpancreaticobiliaryanatomy
AT ashokbhanushali headsortailsconfusionaboutproximalanddistalterminologyforpancreaticobiliaryanatomy
AT anilkotru headsortailsconfusionaboutproximalanddistalterminologyforpancreaticobiliaryanatomy
AT andreaberger headsortailsconfusionaboutproximalanddistalterminologyforpancreaticobiliaryanatomy
AT vivekkaul headsortailsconfusionaboutproximalanddistalterminologyforpancreaticobiliaryanatomy
AT sethagross headsortailsconfusionaboutproximalanddistalterminologyforpancreaticobiliaryanatomy
AT christopherjdimaio headsortailsconfusionaboutproximalanddistalterminologyforpancreaticobiliaryanatomy
AT williambhale headsortailsconfusionaboutproximalanddistalterminologyforpancreaticobiliaryanatomy
AT ramiabbass headsortailsconfusionaboutproximalanddistalterminologyforpancreaticobiliaryanatomy
AT marvinryou headsortailsconfusionaboutproximalanddistalterminologyforpancreaticobiliaryanatomy
AT amritasethi headsortailsconfusionaboutproximalanddistalterminologyforpancreaticobiliaryanatomy
AT briangturner headsortailsconfusionaboutproximalanddistalterminologyforpancreaticobiliaryanatomy
AT paulfockens headsortailsconfusionaboutproximalanddistalterminologyforpancreaticobiliaryanatomy
AT davidldiehl headsortailsconfusionaboutproximalanddistalterminologyforpancreaticobiliaryanatomy
_version_ 1724737363605716992
spelling doaj-2b1d0c55443c42b0a041f1620a7f7a862020-11-25T02:50:39ZengGeorg Thieme Verlag KGEndoscopy International Open2364-37222196-97362018-07-010607E801E80510.1055/a-0605-3331Heads or tails: confusion about “proximal” and “distal” terminology for pancreaticobiliary anatomyHarshit S. Khara0Truptesh H. Kothari1Amitpal S. Johal2Shivangi T. Kothari3Nina Ahuja4Ashok Bhanushali5Anil Kotru6Andrea Berger7Vivek Kaul8Seth A. Gross9Christopher J. DiMaio10William B. Hale11Rami Abbass12Marvin Ryou13Amrita Sethi14Brian G. Turner15Paul Fockens16David L. Diehl17Center for Advanced Therapeutic Endoscopy, Department of Gastroenterology, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, United StatesDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, United StatesCenter for Advanced Therapeutic Endoscopy, Department of Gastroenterology, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, United StatesDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, United StatesCenter for Advanced Therapeutic Endoscopy, Department of Gastroenterology, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, United StatesDepartment of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, United StatesDepartment of Surgery, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, United StatesDepartment of Biomedical and Translational Informatics, Geisinger Health System, Danville, Pennsylvania, United StatesDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, United StatesDepartment of Gastroenterology, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, New York, United StatesDivision of Gastroenterology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, United StatesDepartment of Gastroenterology, Norwalk Hospital Gastroenterology Consultants, Norwalk, Connecticut, United StatesDigestive Health Institute, University Hospitals, Cleveland, Ohio, United StatesDivision of Gastroenterology, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts United StatesDivision of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, United StatesDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, New York, New York, United StatesDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.Center for Advanced Therapeutic Endoscopy, Department of Gastroenterology, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, United StatesBackground and study aims The anatomical meaning of the terms “proximal” and “distal” in relation to the pancreaticobiliary anatomy can be confusing. We aimed to investigate practice patterns of use of the terms “proximal” and “distal” for pancreaticobiliary anatomy amongst various medical specialties. Materials and methods An online survey link to a normal pancreaticobiliary diagram was emailed to a multispecialty physician pool. Respondents were asked to label various parts of the common bile duct (CBD) and pancreatic duct (PD) using the terms “proximal,” “distal,” “not sure,” or “other.” Variability in use of these terms between specialties was assessed. Results We received 370 completed surveys from 182 gastroenterologists (49.2 %), 97 surgeons (26.2 %), 68 radiologists (18.4 %), and 23 other physicians (6.2 %). There was overall consensus in describing the upper/sub-hepatic CBD as “proximal CBD” (73.8 %, P = 0.1499) and the lower/pre-ampullary portion as “distal CBD” (84.6 %, P = 0.1821). However, there was marked variability when describing the PD. The PD in the head of the pancreas was labeled as “proximal PD” by 42.4 % and “distal PD” also by 42.4 % (P < 0.0001); and in the tail as “proximal PD” by 41.4 % and “distal PD” by 43.2 % (P < 0.0001). Only 13.8 % of respondents used descriptive terminology (“PD in the head” or “PD in the tail”) for the PD. Radiologists most often used descriptive terminology for both the CBD and PD. Surgeons most consistently called “proximal PD” in the head, and “distal PD” in the tail of the pancreas. Conclusions Although use of the terms “proximal” and “distal” is still very common to describe pancreaticobiliary anatomy, there is a discordance about its meaning, particularly for the PD. Use of descriptive terminology may be a more accurate alternative to prior ambiguous terminologies such as “proximal” or “distal” and can serve to improve communication and decrease the possibility of medical errors.http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/a-0605-3331