Heads or tails: confusion about “proximal” and “distal” terminology for pancreaticobiliary anatomy
Background and study aims The anatomical meaning of the terms “proximal” and “distal” in relation to the pancreaticobiliary anatomy can be confusing. We aimed to investigate practice patterns of use of the terms “proximal” and “distal” for pancreaticobiliary anatomy amongst various medical specialti...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
2018-07-01
|
Series: | Endoscopy International Open |
Online Access: | http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/a-0605-3331 |
id |
doaj-2b1d0c55443c42b0a041f1620a7f7a86 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Harshit S. Khara Truptesh H. Kothari Amitpal S. Johal Shivangi T. Kothari Nina Ahuja Ashok Bhanushali Anil Kotru Andrea Berger Vivek Kaul Seth A. Gross Christopher J. DiMaio William B. Hale Rami Abbass Marvin Ryou Amrita Sethi Brian G. Turner Paul Fockens David L. Diehl |
spellingShingle |
Harshit S. Khara Truptesh H. Kothari Amitpal S. Johal Shivangi T. Kothari Nina Ahuja Ashok Bhanushali Anil Kotru Andrea Berger Vivek Kaul Seth A. Gross Christopher J. DiMaio William B. Hale Rami Abbass Marvin Ryou Amrita Sethi Brian G. Turner Paul Fockens David L. Diehl Heads or tails: confusion about “proximal” and “distal” terminology for pancreaticobiliary anatomy Endoscopy International Open |
author_facet |
Harshit S. Khara Truptesh H. Kothari Amitpal S. Johal Shivangi T. Kothari Nina Ahuja Ashok Bhanushali Anil Kotru Andrea Berger Vivek Kaul Seth A. Gross Christopher J. DiMaio William B. Hale Rami Abbass Marvin Ryou Amrita Sethi Brian G. Turner Paul Fockens David L. Diehl |
author_sort |
Harshit S. Khara |
title |
Heads or tails: confusion about “proximal” and “distal” terminology for pancreaticobiliary anatomy |
title_short |
Heads or tails: confusion about “proximal” and “distal” terminology for pancreaticobiliary anatomy |
title_full |
Heads or tails: confusion about “proximal” and “distal” terminology for pancreaticobiliary anatomy |
title_fullStr |
Heads or tails: confusion about “proximal” and “distal” terminology for pancreaticobiliary anatomy |
title_full_unstemmed |
Heads or tails: confusion about “proximal” and “distal” terminology for pancreaticobiliary anatomy |
title_sort |
heads or tails: confusion about “proximal” and “distal” terminology for pancreaticobiliary anatomy |
publisher |
Georg Thieme Verlag KG |
series |
Endoscopy International Open |
issn |
2364-3722 2196-9736 |
publishDate |
2018-07-01 |
description |
Background and study aims The anatomical meaning of the terms “proximal” and “distal” in relation to the pancreaticobiliary anatomy can be confusing. We aimed to investigate practice patterns of use of the terms “proximal” and “distal” for pancreaticobiliary anatomy amongst various medical specialties.
Materials and methods An online survey link to a normal pancreaticobiliary diagram was emailed to a multispecialty physician pool. Respondents were asked to label various parts of the common bile duct (CBD) and pancreatic duct (PD) using the terms “proximal,” “distal,” “not sure,” or “other.” Variability in use of these terms between specialties was assessed.
Results We received 370 completed surveys from 182 gastroenterologists (49.2 %), 97 surgeons (26.2 %), 68 radiologists (18.4 %), and 23 other physicians (6.2 %). There was overall consensus in describing the upper/sub-hepatic CBD as “proximal CBD” (73.8 %, P = 0.1499) and the lower/pre-ampullary portion as “distal CBD” (84.6 %, P = 0.1821). However, there was marked variability when describing the PD. The PD in the head of the pancreas was labeled as “proximal PD” by 42.4 % and “distal PD” also by 42.4 % (P < 0.0001); and in the tail as “proximal PD” by 41.4 % and “distal PD” by 43.2 % (P < 0.0001). Only 13.8 % of respondents used descriptive terminology (“PD in the head” or “PD in the tail”) for the PD. Radiologists most often used descriptive terminology for both the CBD and PD. Surgeons most consistently called “proximal PD” in the head, and “distal PD” in the tail of the pancreas.
Conclusions Although use of the terms “proximal” and “distal” is still very common to describe pancreaticobiliary anatomy, there is a discordance about its meaning, particularly for the PD. Use of descriptive terminology may be a more accurate alternative to prior ambiguous terminologies such as “proximal” or “distal” and can serve to improve communication and decrease the possibility of medical errors. |
url |
http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/a-0605-3331 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT harshitskhara headsortailsconfusionaboutproximalanddistalterminologyforpancreaticobiliaryanatomy AT trupteshhkothari headsortailsconfusionaboutproximalanddistalterminologyforpancreaticobiliaryanatomy AT amitpalsjohal headsortailsconfusionaboutproximalanddistalterminologyforpancreaticobiliaryanatomy AT shivangitkothari headsortailsconfusionaboutproximalanddistalterminologyforpancreaticobiliaryanatomy AT ninaahuja headsortailsconfusionaboutproximalanddistalterminologyforpancreaticobiliaryanatomy AT ashokbhanushali headsortailsconfusionaboutproximalanddistalterminologyforpancreaticobiliaryanatomy AT anilkotru headsortailsconfusionaboutproximalanddistalterminologyforpancreaticobiliaryanatomy AT andreaberger headsortailsconfusionaboutproximalanddistalterminologyforpancreaticobiliaryanatomy AT vivekkaul headsortailsconfusionaboutproximalanddistalterminologyforpancreaticobiliaryanatomy AT sethagross headsortailsconfusionaboutproximalanddistalterminologyforpancreaticobiliaryanatomy AT christopherjdimaio headsortailsconfusionaboutproximalanddistalterminologyforpancreaticobiliaryanatomy AT williambhale headsortailsconfusionaboutproximalanddistalterminologyforpancreaticobiliaryanatomy AT ramiabbass headsortailsconfusionaboutproximalanddistalterminologyforpancreaticobiliaryanatomy AT marvinryou headsortailsconfusionaboutproximalanddistalterminologyforpancreaticobiliaryanatomy AT amritasethi headsortailsconfusionaboutproximalanddistalterminologyforpancreaticobiliaryanatomy AT briangturner headsortailsconfusionaboutproximalanddistalterminologyforpancreaticobiliaryanatomy AT paulfockens headsortailsconfusionaboutproximalanddistalterminologyforpancreaticobiliaryanatomy AT davidldiehl headsortailsconfusionaboutproximalanddistalterminologyforpancreaticobiliaryanatomy |
_version_ |
1724737363605716992 |
spelling |
doaj-2b1d0c55443c42b0a041f1620a7f7a862020-11-25T02:50:39ZengGeorg Thieme Verlag KGEndoscopy International Open2364-37222196-97362018-07-010607E801E80510.1055/a-0605-3331Heads or tails: confusion about “proximal” and “distal” terminology for pancreaticobiliary anatomyHarshit S. Khara0Truptesh H. Kothari1Amitpal S. Johal2Shivangi T. Kothari3Nina Ahuja4Ashok Bhanushali5Anil Kotru6Andrea Berger7Vivek Kaul8Seth A. Gross9Christopher J. DiMaio10William B. Hale11Rami Abbass12Marvin Ryou13Amrita Sethi14Brian G. Turner15Paul Fockens16David L. Diehl17Center for Advanced Therapeutic Endoscopy, Department of Gastroenterology, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, United StatesDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, United StatesCenter for Advanced Therapeutic Endoscopy, Department of Gastroenterology, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, United StatesDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, United StatesCenter for Advanced Therapeutic Endoscopy, Department of Gastroenterology, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, United StatesDepartment of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, United StatesDepartment of Surgery, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, United StatesDepartment of Biomedical and Translational Informatics, Geisinger Health System, Danville, Pennsylvania, United StatesDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, United StatesDepartment of Gastroenterology, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, New York, United StatesDivision of Gastroenterology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, United StatesDepartment of Gastroenterology, Norwalk Hospital Gastroenterology Consultants, Norwalk, Connecticut, United StatesDigestive Health Institute, University Hospitals, Cleveland, Ohio, United StatesDivision of Gastroenterology, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts United StatesDivision of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, United StatesDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, New York, New York, United StatesDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.Center for Advanced Therapeutic Endoscopy, Department of Gastroenterology, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, United StatesBackground and study aims The anatomical meaning of the terms “proximal” and “distal” in relation to the pancreaticobiliary anatomy can be confusing. We aimed to investigate practice patterns of use of the terms “proximal” and “distal” for pancreaticobiliary anatomy amongst various medical specialties. Materials and methods An online survey link to a normal pancreaticobiliary diagram was emailed to a multispecialty physician pool. Respondents were asked to label various parts of the common bile duct (CBD) and pancreatic duct (PD) using the terms “proximal,” “distal,” “not sure,” or “other.” Variability in use of these terms between specialties was assessed. Results We received 370 completed surveys from 182 gastroenterologists (49.2 %), 97 surgeons (26.2 %), 68 radiologists (18.4 %), and 23 other physicians (6.2 %). There was overall consensus in describing the upper/sub-hepatic CBD as “proximal CBD” (73.8 %, P = 0.1499) and the lower/pre-ampullary portion as “distal CBD” (84.6 %, P = 0.1821). However, there was marked variability when describing the PD. The PD in the head of the pancreas was labeled as “proximal PD” by 42.4 % and “distal PD” also by 42.4 % (P < 0.0001); and in the tail as “proximal PD” by 41.4 % and “distal PD” by 43.2 % (P < 0.0001). Only 13.8 % of respondents used descriptive terminology (“PD in the head” or “PD in the tail”) for the PD. Radiologists most often used descriptive terminology for both the CBD and PD. Surgeons most consistently called “proximal PD” in the head, and “distal PD” in the tail of the pancreas. Conclusions Although use of the terms “proximal” and “distal” is still very common to describe pancreaticobiliary anatomy, there is a discordance about its meaning, particularly for the PD. Use of descriptive terminology may be a more accurate alternative to prior ambiguous terminologies such as “proximal” or “distal” and can serve to improve communication and decrease the possibility of medical errors.http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/a-0605-3331 |