In-office arthroscopy for the evaluation of chronic knee pain: A case report

This is a case report detailing the use of in-office needle arthroscopy (mi-eye 2™) in a patient with chronic knee pain and inconclusive magnetic resonance imaging findings. The patient is a 40-year-old male who presented to our clinic after an extended history of right knee pain along the medial as...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jacob A West, Nirav H Amin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2017-11-01
Series:SAGE Open Medical Case Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2050313X17740992
id doaj-2b11d2e7389b4369bcbeb42f38df015d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2b11d2e7389b4369bcbeb42f38df015d2020-11-25T02:52:21ZengSAGE PublishingSAGE Open Medical Case Reports2050-313X2017-11-01510.1177/2050313X17740992In-office arthroscopy for the evaluation of chronic knee pain: A case reportJacob A WestNirav H AminThis is a case report detailing the use of in-office needle arthroscopy (mi-eye 2™) in a patient with chronic knee pain and inconclusive magnetic resonance imaging findings. The patient is a 40-year-old male who presented to our clinic after an extended history of right knee pain along the medial aspect with previous failed treatments. Magnetic resonance imaging without contrast had demonstrated full-thickness chondral fissuring of the lateral patellar facet, mild abnormal signals of the proximal patellar tendon and Hoffa’s fat pad, and intact anterior cruciate ligament and posterior cruciate ligament. The patient was previously treated with an ultrasound-guided injection of 2 cm 3 of 1% lidocaine without epinephrine and 1 cm 3 of Kenalog-40 and scheduled for follow-up. At follow-up, clinical examination showed antalgic gait, minimal tenderness along medial joint line, medial pain in deep flexion, and no pain when in varus or valgus. Due to continued discomfort with a negative magnetic resonance imaging, in-office diagnostic arthroscopy was performed using mi-eye 2 revealing a tear of the mid-body of the medial meniscus. The patient subsequently underwent arthroscopic repair and is recovering well with complete resolution of medial joint pain. This report highlights the clinical utility of in-office diagnostic arthroscopy in the management of patients with persistent knee pain and negative or equivocal findings on magnetic resonance imaging.https://doi.org/10.1177/2050313X17740992
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jacob A West
Nirav H Amin
spellingShingle Jacob A West
Nirav H Amin
In-office arthroscopy for the evaluation of chronic knee pain: A case report
SAGE Open Medical Case Reports
author_facet Jacob A West
Nirav H Amin
author_sort Jacob A West
title In-office arthroscopy for the evaluation of chronic knee pain: A case report
title_short In-office arthroscopy for the evaluation of chronic knee pain: A case report
title_full In-office arthroscopy for the evaluation of chronic knee pain: A case report
title_fullStr In-office arthroscopy for the evaluation of chronic knee pain: A case report
title_full_unstemmed In-office arthroscopy for the evaluation of chronic knee pain: A case report
title_sort in-office arthroscopy for the evaluation of chronic knee pain: a case report
publisher SAGE Publishing
series SAGE Open Medical Case Reports
issn 2050-313X
publishDate 2017-11-01
description This is a case report detailing the use of in-office needle arthroscopy (mi-eye 2™) in a patient with chronic knee pain and inconclusive magnetic resonance imaging findings. The patient is a 40-year-old male who presented to our clinic after an extended history of right knee pain along the medial aspect with previous failed treatments. Magnetic resonance imaging without contrast had demonstrated full-thickness chondral fissuring of the lateral patellar facet, mild abnormal signals of the proximal patellar tendon and Hoffa’s fat pad, and intact anterior cruciate ligament and posterior cruciate ligament. The patient was previously treated with an ultrasound-guided injection of 2 cm 3 of 1% lidocaine without epinephrine and 1 cm 3 of Kenalog-40 and scheduled for follow-up. At follow-up, clinical examination showed antalgic gait, minimal tenderness along medial joint line, medial pain in deep flexion, and no pain when in varus or valgus. Due to continued discomfort with a negative magnetic resonance imaging, in-office diagnostic arthroscopy was performed using mi-eye 2 revealing a tear of the mid-body of the medial meniscus. The patient subsequently underwent arthroscopic repair and is recovering well with complete resolution of medial joint pain. This report highlights the clinical utility of in-office diagnostic arthroscopy in the management of patients with persistent knee pain and negative or equivocal findings on magnetic resonance imaging.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2050313X17740992
work_keys_str_mv AT jacobawest inofficearthroscopyfortheevaluationofchronickneepainacasereport
AT niravhamin inofficearthroscopyfortheevaluationofchronickneepainacasereport
_version_ 1724730583047733248