Hemi-diaphragmatic paresis following extrafascial versus conventional intrafascial approach for interscalene brachial plexus block: A double-blind randomised, controlled trial

Background and Aims: Hemidiaphragmatic paresis occurs in almost all patients undergoing interscalene block for proximal upper limb surgeries. This study tested hypothesis that ultrasound-guided extrafascial approach of interscalene block under nerve stimulator guidance reduces incidence of hemidiaph...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Basavaraja Ayyanagouda, Vinod Hosalli, Prableen Kaur, Uday Ambi, S Y Hulkund
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2019-01-01
Series:Indian Journal of Anaesthesia
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ijaweb.org/article.asp?issn=0019-5049;year=2019;volume=63;issue=5;spage=375;epage=381;aulast=Ayyanagouda
id doaj-2b07cc5be5c544d7ba51d06d7db4d611
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2b07cc5be5c544d7ba51d06d7db4d6112020-11-24T22:13:21ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Anaesthesia0019-50490976-28172019-01-0163537538110.4103/ija.IJA_69_19Hemi-diaphragmatic paresis following extrafascial versus conventional intrafascial approach for interscalene brachial plexus block: A double-blind randomised, controlled trialBasavaraja AyyanagoudaVinod HosalliPrableen KaurUday AmbiS Y HulkundBackground and Aims: Hemidiaphragmatic paresis occurs in almost all patients undergoing interscalene block for proximal upper limb surgeries. This study tested hypothesis that ultrasound-guided extrafascial approach of interscalene block under nerve stimulator guidance reduces incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paresis in comparison to intrafascial approach by achieving same degree of anaesthesia and analgesia. Methods: Sixty patients undergoing proximal upper limb surgeries were randomised to receive an ultrasound-guided interscalene brachial plexus block (ISB) with the aid of nerve stimulator for surgical anaesthesia and analgesia using 20 mL 0.5% ropivacaine by extrafascial (Group E) or intrafascial (Group I) approach. The incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paresis was measured by M-mode ultrasound before and 30 min after the procedure. Secondary outcomes such as respiratory functions (forced vital capacity, forced expiratory volume in 1 s and peak expiratory flow rate) were measured, and complications were recorded and compared. The statistics was obtained using SPSS Version 19. Levene's test and paired and unpaired t-test were used. P value <0.05 was considered significant. Results: The incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paresis was 17% and 46% in Group E and Group I, respectively (P < 0.0001). All other respiratory outcomes were preserved in Group E compared with Group I. Conclusion: Ultrasound-guided ISB with the aid of nerve stimulator through extrafascial approach reduces the incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paresis and also reduces respiratory function impairment when compared with intrafascial approach.http://www.ijaweb.org/article.asp?issn=0019-5049;year=2019;volume=63;issue=5;spage=375;epage=381;aulast=AyyanagoudaBrachial plexus blockdiaphragminterscalene blockperipheral nerve stimultaorropivacaineultrasound
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Basavaraja Ayyanagouda
Vinod Hosalli
Prableen Kaur
Uday Ambi
S Y Hulkund
spellingShingle Basavaraja Ayyanagouda
Vinod Hosalli
Prableen Kaur
Uday Ambi
S Y Hulkund
Hemi-diaphragmatic paresis following extrafascial versus conventional intrafascial approach for interscalene brachial plexus block: A double-blind randomised, controlled trial
Indian Journal of Anaesthesia
Brachial plexus block
diaphragm
interscalene block
peripheral nerve stimultaor
ropivacaine
ultrasound
author_facet Basavaraja Ayyanagouda
Vinod Hosalli
Prableen Kaur
Uday Ambi
S Y Hulkund
author_sort Basavaraja Ayyanagouda
title Hemi-diaphragmatic paresis following extrafascial versus conventional intrafascial approach for interscalene brachial plexus block: A double-blind randomised, controlled trial
title_short Hemi-diaphragmatic paresis following extrafascial versus conventional intrafascial approach for interscalene brachial plexus block: A double-blind randomised, controlled trial
title_full Hemi-diaphragmatic paresis following extrafascial versus conventional intrafascial approach for interscalene brachial plexus block: A double-blind randomised, controlled trial
title_fullStr Hemi-diaphragmatic paresis following extrafascial versus conventional intrafascial approach for interscalene brachial plexus block: A double-blind randomised, controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Hemi-diaphragmatic paresis following extrafascial versus conventional intrafascial approach for interscalene brachial plexus block: A double-blind randomised, controlled trial
title_sort hemi-diaphragmatic paresis following extrafascial versus conventional intrafascial approach for interscalene brachial plexus block: a double-blind randomised, controlled trial
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Indian Journal of Anaesthesia
issn 0019-5049
0976-2817
publishDate 2019-01-01
description Background and Aims: Hemidiaphragmatic paresis occurs in almost all patients undergoing interscalene block for proximal upper limb surgeries. This study tested hypothesis that ultrasound-guided extrafascial approach of interscalene block under nerve stimulator guidance reduces incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paresis in comparison to intrafascial approach by achieving same degree of anaesthesia and analgesia. Methods: Sixty patients undergoing proximal upper limb surgeries were randomised to receive an ultrasound-guided interscalene brachial plexus block (ISB) with the aid of nerve stimulator for surgical anaesthesia and analgesia using 20 mL 0.5% ropivacaine by extrafascial (Group E) or intrafascial (Group I) approach. The incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paresis was measured by M-mode ultrasound before and 30 min after the procedure. Secondary outcomes such as respiratory functions (forced vital capacity, forced expiratory volume in 1 s and peak expiratory flow rate) were measured, and complications were recorded and compared. The statistics was obtained using SPSS Version 19. Levene's test and paired and unpaired t-test were used. P value <0.05 was considered significant. Results: The incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paresis was 17% and 46% in Group E and Group I, respectively (P < 0.0001). All other respiratory outcomes were preserved in Group E compared with Group I. Conclusion: Ultrasound-guided ISB with the aid of nerve stimulator through extrafascial approach reduces the incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paresis and also reduces respiratory function impairment when compared with intrafascial approach.
topic Brachial plexus block
diaphragm
interscalene block
peripheral nerve stimultaor
ropivacaine
ultrasound
url http://www.ijaweb.org/article.asp?issn=0019-5049;year=2019;volume=63;issue=5;spage=375;epage=381;aulast=Ayyanagouda
work_keys_str_mv AT basavarajaayyanagouda hemidiaphragmaticparesisfollowingextrafascialversusconventionalintrafascialapproachforinterscalenebrachialplexusblockadoubleblindrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT vinodhosalli hemidiaphragmaticparesisfollowingextrafascialversusconventionalintrafascialapproachforinterscalenebrachialplexusblockadoubleblindrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT prableenkaur hemidiaphragmaticparesisfollowingextrafascialversusconventionalintrafascialapproachforinterscalenebrachialplexusblockadoubleblindrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT udayambi hemidiaphragmaticparesisfollowingextrafascialversusconventionalintrafascialapproachforinterscalenebrachialplexusblockadoubleblindrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT syhulkund hemidiaphragmaticparesisfollowingextrafascialversusconventionalintrafascialapproachforinterscalenebrachialplexusblockadoubleblindrandomisedcontrolledtrial
_version_ 1725801645296582656