Injectable fillers: imaging features and related complications

Abstract Background Injectable fillers are currently widely used in the clinical practice; there are many indications for injectable fillers including facial and gluteal rejuvenation, management of post-traumatic facial disfiguring, and pathological volumetric loss secondary to certain disease medic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mohsen Ahmed Abdelmohsen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2020-07-01
Series:The Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s43055-020-00249-4
id doaj-2b04c5df89d4469a85aeb3c2394c8282
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2b04c5df89d4469a85aeb3c2394c82822020-11-25T03:09:18ZengSpringerOpenThe Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine2090-47622020-07-015111910.1186/s43055-020-00249-4Injectable fillers: imaging features and related complicationsMohsen Ahmed Abdelmohsen0Department of Radio-diagnosis and Intervention, Faculty of Medicine, University of AlexandriaAbstract Background Injectable fillers are currently widely used in the clinical practice; there are many indications for injectable fillers including facial and gluteal rejuvenation, management of post-traumatic facial disfiguring, and pathological volumetric loss secondary to certain disease medications like human immune deficiency virus (HIV) medications. Radiologists should be familiar with the specific imaging features of the injectable fillers, characteristic anatomical locations, and possible complications to avoid diagnostic pitfalls especially when incidentally discovered while imaging of other pathological process like neoplastic work up or granulomatous lesions follow-up. Results The study included 48 patients (45 females and 3 males): 44 patients with facial injectable fillers and four patients with pelvic injectable fillers. Of the 48 patients, 37 patients showed unremarkable fillers features with normal morphological features and anatomical distribution, and eleven patients showed complications: six patients showed one complication, and five patients showed more than one complications. Dedicated fillers imaging study was done in 22 patients, while in the other 26 patients, imaging was done for other reasons, and fillers were notified and documented. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was done for 46 patients; two patients were subjected to combine ultra-sonographic and CT examinations with no clinical indication for MRI study assessment. Conclusion Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an effective tool for evaluation of facial and gluteal region fillers with delineation of their imaging features and related potential complications. Differentiation between fillers and neoplastic or granulomatous lesions could be accurately done with MRI.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s43055-020-00249-4Injectable fillersNasolabial foldFillers complicationsMigrationAbscessMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mohsen Ahmed Abdelmohsen
spellingShingle Mohsen Ahmed Abdelmohsen
Injectable fillers: imaging features and related complications
The Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine
Injectable fillers
Nasolabial fold
Fillers complications
Migration
Abscess
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
author_facet Mohsen Ahmed Abdelmohsen
author_sort Mohsen Ahmed Abdelmohsen
title Injectable fillers: imaging features and related complications
title_short Injectable fillers: imaging features and related complications
title_full Injectable fillers: imaging features and related complications
title_fullStr Injectable fillers: imaging features and related complications
title_full_unstemmed Injectable fillers: imaging features and related complications
title_sort injectable fillers: imaging features and related complications
publisher SpringerOpen
series The Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine
issn 2090-4762
publishDate 2020-07-01
description Abstract Background Injectable fillers are currently widely used in the clinical practice; there are many indications for injectable fillers including facial and gluteal rejuvenation, management of post-traumatic facial disfiguring, and pathological volumetric loss secondary to certain disease medications like human immune deficiency virus (HIV) medications. Radiologists should be familiar with the specific imaging features of the injectable fillers, characteristic anatomical locations, and possible complications to avoid diagnostic pitfalls especially when incidentally discovered while imaging of other pathological process like neoplastic work up or granulomatous lesions follow-up. Results The study included 48 patients (45 females and 3 males): 44 patients with facial injectable fillers and four patients with pelvic injectable fillers. Of the 48 patients, 37 patients showed unremarkable fillers features with normal morphological features and anatomical distribution, and eleven patients showed complications: six patients showed one complication, and five patients showed more than one complications. Dedicated fillers imaging study was done in 22 patients, while in the other 26 patients, imaging was done for other reasons, and fillers were notified and documented. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was done for 46 patients; two patients were subjected to combine ultra-sonographic and CT examinations with no clinical indication for MRI study assessment. Conclusion Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an effective tool for evaluation of facial and gluteal region fillers with delineation of their imaging features and related potential complications. Differentiation between fillers and neoplastic or granulomatous lesions could be accurately done with MRI.
topic Injectable fillers
Nasolabial fold
Fillers complications
Migration
Abscess
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s43055-020-00249-4
work_keys_str_mv AT mohsenahmedabdelmohsen injectablefillersimagingfeaturesandrelatedcomplications
_version_ 1724663446664904704