Penetrating retro-orbital foreign body – large glass shards: A maxillofacial surgery case report

Objectives: This case report looks at a 53-year-old patient who had suffered a penetrating foreign body injury to the retro-orbital space and the surgical approach taken to remove the large glass fragments found and to correct the damage caused. Having fallen while holding a drinking glass, this pat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kristian K Blackhall, David C Laraway
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2016-02-01
Series:SAGE Open Medical Case Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2050313X15622890
id doaj-2b029ca7be014bc986119c9025e1f44f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2b029ca7be014bc986119c9025e1f44f2020-11-25T03:04:14ZengSAGE PublishingSAGE Open Medical Case Reports2050-313X2016-02-01410.1177/2050313X1562289010.1177_2050313X15622890Penetrating retro-orbital foreign body – large glass shards: A maxillofacial surgery case reportKristian K BlackhallDavid C LarawayObjectives: This case report looks at a 53-year-old patient who had suffered a penetrating foreign body injury to the retro-orbital space and the surgical approach taken to remove the large glass fragments found and to correct the damage caused. Having fallen while holding a drinking glass, this patient suffered multiple laceration injuries to the maxillofacial region upon the glass shattering in contact with the face. However, unbeknownst to the patient, several glass fragments became embedded in the retro-orbital space, and this was only detected on presentation 2 days post-injury with unusual symptoms of sharp, sudden pain elicited on extreme gaze as well as ocular motility restriction. Methods: This embedded foreign body required a creative surgical approach to remove it involving gaining access to the retro-orbital space via a superior approach and cautiously following the path the glass shards took upon entry, all the way to the posterior aspect of superior rectus. Intra-operative radiographic guidance was required due to the restriction of operating within this space and particularly when removing glass fragments distal to superior rectus. Results and Conclusion: The patient recovered well and experienced an immediate improvement in ocular motility with a return to relative normality over the next few months.https://doi.org/10.1177/2050313X15622890
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kristian K Blackhall
David C Laraway
spellingShingle Kristian K Blackhall
David C Laraway
Penetrating retro-orbital foreign body – large glass shards: A maxillofacial surgery case report
SAGE Open Medical Case Reports
author_facet Kristian K Blackhall
David C Laraway
author_sort Kristian K Blackhall
title Penetrating retro-orbital foreign body – large glass shards: A maxillofacial surgery case report
title_short Penetrating retro-orbital foreign body – large glass shards: A maxillofacial surgery case report
title_full Penetrating retro-orbital foreign body – large glass shards: A maxillofacial surgery case report
title_fullStr Penetrating retro-orbital foreign body – large glass shards: A maxillofacial surgery case report
title_full_unstemmed Penetrating retro-orbital foreign body – large glass shards: A maxillofacial surgery case report
title_sort penetrating retro-orbital foreign body – large glass shards: a maxillofacial surgery case report
publisher SAGE Publishing
series SAGE Open Medical Case Reports
issn 2050-313X
publishDate 2016-02-01
description Objectives: This case report looks at a 53-year-old patient who had suffered a penetrating foreign body injury to the retro-orbital space and the surgical approach taken to remove the large glass fragments found and to correct the damage caused. Having fallen while holding a drinking glass, this patient suffered multiple laceration injuries to the maxillofacial region upon the glass shattering in contact with the face. However, unbeknownst to the patient, several glass fragments became embedded in the retro-orbital space, and this was only detected on presentation 2 days post-injury with unusual symptoms of sharp, sudden pain elicited on extreme gaze as well as ocular motility restriction. Methods: This embedded foreign body required a creative surgical approach to remove it involving gaining access to the retro-orbital space via a superior approach and cautiously following the path the glass shards took upon entry, all the way to the posterior aspect of superior rectus. Intra-operative radiographic guidance was required due to the restriction of operating within this space and particularly when removing glass fragments distal to superior rectus. Results and Conclusion: The patient recovered well and experienced an immediate improvement in ocular motility with a return to relative normality over the next few months.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2050313X15622890
work_keys_str_mv AT kristiankblackhall penetratingretroorbitalforeignbodylargeglassshardsamaxillofacialsurgerycasereport
AT davidclaraway penetratingretroorbitalforeignbodylargeglassshardsamaxillofacialsurgerycasereport
_version_ 1724682096788635648